Preview

South China Sea Dispute

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
10784 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
South China Sea Dispute
ABSTRACT

Nowadays, the conflict of territory solving in the world causes many complicated problems among countries, as well as tensions in foreign policies. One of these conflicts is the dispute in South China Sea between China and six neighbor ASEAN countries. With the intervention of the United States, the issue turns to be more serious as it attracts a lot of concerns from international community. This research tries to find a clear way of understanding the South China Sea conflict, specifically about the effort of China and Vietnam to gain the control over the two groups of islands: Paracel and Spratly. The hypothesis intends to express the possibility about Vietnam’s victory in this conflict with the help of the United States. Hence, the authors want to discuss about causes and effects under the lens of international relations. In reality, the dispute is still up for debates and it still needs more and more talks and balancing policies from all sides.

South China Sea Dispute: An International or American Affair?

Introduction

In the Southeast Asian region lays a body of water and islands which have been disputed about for the possession of them. This area by international term is known as the “South China Sea.” (Keep in mind that they do not have any correlations with China but it is rather just an international name.) This body of water runs along territories belonging to China, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, Philippines, and many other countries. Within this body of water, there are well over 200 islands which are un-inhabited by people and contain useful resources. Considering that the sea does not surround just one country which can claim authority over it, it is difficult to determine who has the right to these islands. There are no laws on who these islands belong to. This dispute brings into many questions about sovereignty, law of the sea, and resource ownership rights on an international level if more than one country surrounds the sea and



References: 3. China, I. O. (2009, January). China 's National Defense in 2008. Retrieved September 23, 2010, from fas.org: http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/nukes/2008DefenseWhitePaper_Jan2009.pdf 4 7. Gates, R. M. (2008, May 31). International Institute for Strategic Studies (Singapore). Retrieved September 23, 2010, from Defense.gov: http://www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1253 8 9. Gomez, J. (2010, Aug 18). US opposes use of force in South China Sea dispute. Retrieved Sep 2010, 12, from AP Associated Press: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ig7Ju23z9fBrSvPUrZK77jINOL2QD9HLTU981 10 14. Kaufman, S. (2010, July 23). Clinton Urges Legal Resolution of South China Sea Dispute. Retrieved September 12, 2010, from America.gov: Sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands 15 16. Lam, T. (2010, Sep 8). Could Vietnam Be America’s New Counterweight to China? Retrieved Sep 13, 2010, from New America Media: http://newamericamedia.org/2010/09/could-viet-nam-be-americas-new-counterweight-to-china.php 17 23. Singh, R. (2010, September 22). ASEAN invites India, US to keep China in check. Retrieved September 24, 2010, from Hindustantimes.com: http://www.hindustantimes.com/ASEAN-invites-India-US-to-keep-China-in-check/Article1-603510.aspx 24 25. Vietnam-US relations grow fast, says diplomat. (2010, July 12). Retrieved September 24, 2010, from vietnamembassy-usa.org: http://www.vietnamembassy-usa.org/news/story.php?d=20100715113526 26 27. Wong, E. (2010, September 22). U.S influence in Asia Revives Amid China 's Disputes. Retrieved September 24, 2010, from nytimes.com: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/world/asia/23china.html?_r=1&ref=global-home 28 [7] See more at www.apeaweb.org/confer/sea06/papers/feng-wu.pdf, p15-19, 2006 [8] People’s Republic of China, China’s National Defense (2008). [9] Fumiaki Kubo University of Tokyo as cited in “China’s Disputes in Asia Buttress Influence of U.S” New York Time”( Sep, 2010) [10]  Joint Statement Between the United States of America and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, ( June, 2008)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    3. Carter, James M. "Inventing Vietnam: The United States and Statemaking in Southeast Asia." Order No. 3153740, University of Houston, 2004. http://ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/305195878?accountid=13631.…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the moment the Geneva Conference ended in 1954, America was South Vietnams backbone. This can be proven in a letter sent from President Eisenhower of the USA to Ngo Dinh Diem which states that the United States wanted to help with the welfare, stability and strength of the government of South Vietnam. America’s contribution to South Vietnam took form in many different ways, such as;…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Due to this the spread of communism and the preservation of America’s international ‘power’, a focus on the spread of communism to Vietnam was created- an area of Asia that America had not previously been involved nor concerned with. It was American belief that appeasement, that had such been seen before WWII and throughout the Truman administration, was not one that would secure America’s place in the world nor ensure prestige and international reputation. Thus the U.S vowed to stop the aggression of Communism before it happened, and consequently became involved in Vietnam in an attempt to preserve World stance and order through the containment of Communism. Conclusively, the events, establishments and decisions made by the American leaders in response to the conflict within Vietnam divulge a plethoric insight into the ideals, values and views of American politics during the 1960’s. From the very beginning of 1950, when American involvement in Vietnam first became notable, a wide range of sentiments in regard to international relations was demonstrated and revealed by the American decisions made in regard to Vietnam. Through the decisions made in regard to their involvement America namely displayed their attitude toward the Asian nations, their principles in regard to the existence and expansion of Communism and their position in reference to their ‘place in the world’- their prestige, power and influence. America became involved in Vietnam in the 1960’s for a variety of inter-connected and reflective reasons. Essentially, the philosophy of Communism was in direct opposition to the capitalist and democratic system of Government of the United States. In fear of the spread of such an ideology America decided that becoming involved in South Vietnam was the best way to assure the expansion of communism was not achieved. This decision was not simply made based upon the fear of the spread of Communism, or the “Domino Theory”. Rather…

    • 2788 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a believer of the 'Domino Theory', JFK continued supporting the South Vietnamese government in ‘containing’ Communism and marked the inevitable American involvement in the Vietnam…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reischauer, E., China and Japan: Rivals or Allies? In Wilcox, F (ed), China and the Great Powers: Relations With the United States, the Soviet Union, and Japan. Praeger Publishers: New York. 1974.…

    • 13480 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ross, Robert S. "China 's Foreign Relations After Tiananmen: Challenges for the U.S." The National Bureau of Asian Research, 2014.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brophy, B (2011, March 25) “US foreign aid faces cuts while China’s reach grows” Retrieve…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Diaoyu Islands

    • 3678 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Last development of this conflict dated from the beginning of this month, when Japan spotted Chinese warships near to these islands. They called it “dangerous” and “ regrettable”. But why undertook China this action? What precedes to this and why can’t both parties come out this conflict? These are some examples we wanted to know and researched.…

    • 3678 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Is China Failing?

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hertsgaard, Mark . 1997. "Our Real China Problem." The Atlantic Online. http://www.theatlantic. com/issues/97nov/china.htm (November, 1997).…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reviewing Hofstede’s measures, it helped me understand more that just because two countries may have similar cultural similarities, their relationships with each other may not be on the best terms. The primary issues that separate China and Japan go way back in history. I know Japan has always felt that they are superior to China. According to ibiblio.org, “the series of wars and conflicts between China and Japan are known as the Sino-Japanese Wars. These wars weakened China, while helping Japan gain more power; that is, until the final war, in which China finally gained allies, most notably the United States and Great Britain. The Second Sino-Japanese War is also considered a part of World War Two. (ibiblio.org, 2012) This began a long and drawn out conflict between these two Asian nations, causing a lot of distrust and animosity. I believe a big part of the tension between these two nations come from the Japanese Occupation of China, but also as a result of the recent dispute over the Diaoyu-Senkaku Islands. According to the New York Times, “in recent years, China has become embroiled in a series of disputes over rights to islands and seabeds in the South China and East China seas. The areas are rich in oil, gas, fishing and mineral resources. But the conflicts are also driven by hard feelings over the past, particularly Japan’s decades of imperial conquest, and by fears over the future, as the region adjusts to China’s rise to superpower status. (N.Y. Times, 2012)…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richelman, J (1999) China and the United States: From Hostility to Engagement. Retrieved June 7, 2008 from website: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB19/…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Jacques. (2010, February 16). US vs. China: a dangerous phase has begun :China is a…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both China and the U.S. share high levels of interdependence with each other. They have made a very complex economic arrangement. America accepts Chinese imports and pays in dollars, and China holds American dollars and bonds (Nye 56). While everyone might believe war between the U.S. and China is inevitable, it is far from the reality. It is the liberal perspective that good trade can foster peace between two states (Copeland 6). Both states realized that conflict between them will be detrimental to both sides. What makes both of these sides from engaging in violence together is rationality. Richard Cobden argued that today that it is impossible to “enrich oneself through force”, because by destroying bonds is terrible for the economy (Copeland…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frost, F. 1993. Vietnam 's foreign relations. Singapore: Regional Strategic Studies Programme, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: Realizing that decreased conflict would lead to overall regional peace and stability, SEA states have largely been able to address conflicts that state countries have interests in resolving. However, if the issue appears to largely jeopardize national interests at the expense of conflict resolution, then SEA states would be ineffective in dealing with such sources of tensions.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays