Preview

Sources, Characteristics and Effects of Mass Media Communication on Science: a Review of the Literature, Current Trends and Areas for Future Research

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8973 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sources, Characteristics and Effects of Mass Media Communication on Science: a Review of the Literature, Current Trends and Areas for Future Research
Sociology Compass 5/6 (2011): 399–412, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x

Sources, Characteristics and Effects of Mass Media Communication on Science: A Review of the Literature, Current Trends and Areas for Future Research
¨ Mike S. Schafer*
University of Hamburg

Abstract

A significant amount of science coverage can be found nowadays in the mass media and is the main source of information about science for many. Accordingly, the relation between science and the media has been intensively analyzed within the social scientific community. It is difficult to keep track of this research, however, as a flurry of studies has been published on the issue. This article provides such an overview. First, it lays out the main theoretical models of science communication, that is, the ‘public understanding of science’ and the ‘mediatization’ model. Second, it describes existing empirical research. In this section, it demonstrates how science’s agenda-building has improved, how science journalists working routines are described, how different scientific disciplines are presented in the mass media and what effects these media representations (might) have on the audience. Third, the article points out future fields of research.

‘Scientists Bypass Need for Embryo to get Stem Cells’, ‘New Signs of Water Mean Mars May Once Have Supported Life’, ‘Proton Beams are Back on Track At Collider’ are all recent headlines extracted from the front pages of The New York Times. They illustrate that a significant amount of science coverage is found nowadays in the mass media ‘in front page articles[,] stories about discoveries, news about health, and reviews of economic trends and business affairs’ (Nelkin 1995, 1f.) – and that the chances for the broader public to inform themselves about science may have never been better (Felt et al. 1995, 244). This development is mirrored within the social sciences, where the relationship between science and the media has been increasingly examined since



References: ª 2011 The Author Sociology Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 5/6 (2011): 399–412, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x Mass Media Communication on Science ª 2011 The Author Sociology Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 5/6 (2011): 399–412, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x ª 2011 The Author Sociology Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 5/6 (2011): 399–412, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x ª 2011 The Author Sociology Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 5/6 (2011): 399–412, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x ª 2011 The Author Sociology Compass ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 5/6 (2011): 399–412, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article “Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts” Jeanne Fahnestock (1998) examines what happens to scientific research when it is translated to appeal to a wider audience. In order to assess what happens to this research, Fahnestock compares “paired communications” (332) – the original research paper and a version that has been interpreted for a wider audience. The evidence these comparisons reveal suggests that facts tend to change in three different ways when translated for a wider audience – through “genre shift”, “statement types” and “stasis theory” (Fahnestock 332).…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Michael Specter “TED” talk “The Danger of Science Denial” I am not sure it is correct to say society has a problem with Science and progress. The problem is our society’s lack of trust in what is said by our government and news media? Or could it be our lack of trust in big money having ability to manipulate scientific findings for their financial benefit. With large amounts of news reports on social media, for example Facebook and twitter. Many of these news items appear so real. Who do you believe?…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    D2: Analyse whether the media makes a positive contribution to the public’s perception of Science.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The public’s attitude towards science is something that is least talked about in our society. Even in schools, teaching students about how scientists communicate with the public is given the least importance. As a result, I think most people who are involved in science disciplines are not sure how to respond when they come across this question.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stories sometimes are true and sometimes they are false but it is up to the public to believe in what is right and what is wrong. In this day and age, where information is available at the touch of a mouse, it’s not surprising that the media is a particularly dominant and powerful force in our civilization. Research has shown that the newspapers are the public’s primary source of information on scientific issues.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Believe it or not, it was once illegal to teach the theory of evolution to children in school. A teacher in Tennessee named John Scopes had violated this law in the 1900s, which resulted in the John Scopes trial. This trial marked the shift of the beliefs of Americans from religion to science. Scientific research has been going on for decades and it has, for the most part, helped improve our lives, but it is a very tough field. In The Great Influenza, author John M. Barry used juxtaposition, listing, and structure to characterize scientific research as a challenging and uncertain field that requires a lot of courage to accept defeat, but also have the determination…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oj Simpson Case

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Society.”Journal of Social Issues, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9 Apr. 2010, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02130.x/full. Accessed 2 Mar. 2017.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthropology or Sociology

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Sociology," Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2009. Retrieved May 25, 2009 fromhttp://encarta.msn.com © 1997-2009 Microsoft Corporation.…

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. I agree with Dr. Greene about we, as the general public should become more engaged with science. The reason is so we can help make more informative decisions about the problems we face as a society.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although language that produces fear can be effective, it is also something that cannot be done in good conscience. In examining this, I think that it is important to again think about politics’ place in science. Politics should not bring about fear when…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Put a Little Science in Your Life” the author, Brian Greene, expresses how science is such a magnificent study, but yet is not catching the attention of youth today. In today’s education system students aren’t looking at science in the big picture, but are merely looking at it as another course they are required to pass. Greene expresses to his reader’s that science is everywhere, and that everything created is somewhat made up of science. In the school room, teachers are given an agenda to follow and told to stick to that agenda. This agenda does not catch the interest of all, or any of the student’s in which they leave the class with a cold and/or dull feeling towards science. Greene expresses to his readers that Science is…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Animal Dissection

    • 2332 Words
    • 10 Pages

    6. "Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media." Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Web. 19 Apr. 2012. <http://www.people-press.org/2009/07/09/public-praises-science-scientists-fault-public-media/>.…

    • 2332 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the interview with journalist Chris Mooney, conducted by Jeff Young, the main subject is the issue of scientific illiteracy in the United States. This discussion is brought about by a Pew Research Center poll that found a majority of Americans do not believe in evolution, do not think climate change is being caused by humans, and do not know that an electron is smaller than an atom.1 Jeff Young and Chris Mooney discuss Mooney’s book entitled Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future and Mooney’s opinion on why the relationship between scientists and the general public is growing apart. They begin the conversation attempting to explain the reasoning behind the growing gap between scientists and the general public. Mooney points out that one of the main causes is the bad coverage of scientific advancements by the media and how a person’s political party may have an influence on their opinion about climate change. He mentions how a majority of Republicans, no matter how educated they may be, have a higher chance of believing climate change is not human-induced and a majority of Democrats, no matter how little education they may have, have a higher chance of believing that climate change is being caused by humans. Mooney and Young also discuss how the media and general public may not be the only ones at fault for the misunderstanding and growing gap away from scientists. They partly put the blame on scientists for not being able to explain everything in terms that lay people will understand and since people cannot understand what science is saying, they do not believe it. A solution that is discussed is the rap song that was written about the Hadron Collider. They talk about how the general public gained a bit more understanding about what is going on with the collider because they listened to the rap and were able to understand it. Mooney…

    • 1057 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their huge frustration of the public’s misunderstanding of science makes them feel distant from the general public, so these frustrated scientists may not have a motive to learn how to communicate to the public effectively. However, Skorton points out that the public’s lack of understanding the scientific field directly affects their work and their ability to generate knowledge and solve problems. Scientists may fail to “garner the financial and political support [they] need to carry [their work] out” if the public does not understand or appreciate their work (Skorton). By relating scientists’ own benefits, Skorton emphasizes the importance of effective communication. Therefore, scientists understand it is necessary for them to embrace the liberal arts in order to convey their work to the public efficaciously, which enables them to do their work and solve problems more…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics