Preview

Solar Power technology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Solar Power technology
BOOK I

Q1. Briefly explain a) What Aristotle means by “Good,” b) How he understands goods as following in hierarchy.

A1. According to Aristotle, Good is something on which all things aim like every art, every inquiry, every action and pursuit. Although every action aims at good, their ends are different.
B) Goods according to him fall in hierarchy as if medical science is aiming at good then the ending has to be related to health. Similarly, a house is good in term of providing a means of activity of living. Therefore, it doesn’t matter whether the activities are themselves the end of the action, as everything aim’s at good and in the above cases, in hierarchy as the ending is related to the action.

Q2. What is the science that deals with the human good? Explain why Aristotle sees it this way.

A2. Political science s the science, which deals with human good. Political science refers to the branch of knowledge that deals with systems of government. He thinks that this must be good for man. Although, it is worthwhile to attain the end merely for the men, it is finer and more godlike to attain it for a nation or for a city.

Q3. What difference does Aristotle see between the science of the good and mathematics? Why does he claim that the science of the good is difficult for the young? And, what does he take to be a condition for understanding this science?

A3. In political science, people admit of much variety and fluctuation of opinion. In this case, just the way it’s foolish to ask a mathematician to give a rhetorician scientific proofs after solving a problem, similarly it is the mark of an educated man to look for precision just so far as the nature of the subject admits. He thinks that the science of the good is difficult for the young because a person can only judge a thing if the person is a good judge of that subject. Therefore a young man is inappropriate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Matrix 2

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle made significantly valiant contributions to the fields of science, philosophy, and ethics, inspiring others to use his finding for future discoveries. With the dedication to resolve previously unsolvable problems, Aristotle questioned ancient discoveries and was well known for his powerful lectures and debates. Being the first to develop a formalized system of reason,…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groundhog Day

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. There are many virtues in life that one may have. Virtues are characteristics we have that according to Aristotle help us lead the good life. Among these many virtues is generosity. Being generous can help us lead a virtuous life, thus a good one. However what is generosity? Generosity is a virtue but what makes somebody generous? First, we need to understand the most basic part of being generous, and that is the act of giving. In order to be virtuous, one must act, and in this case by giving. Giving to those in need may be seen as virtuous. By helping those in need and giving to them we may accomplish a better life. However, further thinking leads us to understand that giving in itself is not enough. We need to be able to know how to give just the right amount. By giving either too much or not enough we cannot be virtuous. When a person gives too much, one cannot help the other person. The person in need may become dependent on the person who is giving and receiver will not learn to benefit from the generosity. On the other hand, not giving enough is stinginess. It shows the lack of character and can be seen as selfish. Obviously by not giving enough or giving too much, one cannot accomplish the true goal of giving, which is to help others. In conclusion, generosity is one of life’s many virtues and it is seen as the act of giving. We know that the act of giving has to be done in just the right amount in order to be virtuous and have a fulfilling life.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Title

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s argument in virtue ethics is based on an appeal to the notion of an objective account of “the good” for human beings and happiness. “The good” is so important that every good soul takes it as the end. On the other hand, it is also so hard to grasp what are “the good”, so that people seem to be able to intuitively feel it exists but cannot establish a solid belief in it. If one does not know what are “good”, then naturally they will not be able to identify other things that have goodness.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, for Aristotle, humans are intended to be rational. Similarly for Epictetus “what it is to be a human being, is to be a rational mortal creature” (Graver, 2015). The term “rational” means to think things through over and over before deciding to do an action. Aristotle uses this term to explain that “the good is one whose actions as a rule are solidly based on excellent reasoning and who spends a great amount of time thinking” (SOMETHING).…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle's Virtue Ethics

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this essay, with all the information I have gathered from the readings and lectures, I will be discussing an essential concept of Aristotle’s virtue ethics; his “doctrine of the mean”. I will provide a detailed explanation of Aristotle’s mean, how it is meant to be applied when making decisions, provide arguments from various sources that agree with the main concept of the “doctrine of the mean” and with all of the information gathered, I will prove that this doctrine is extremely useful to people when it comes to making moral decisions in life.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics book one, he starts of describing “good”. He believes that every activity humans do is to achieve a good. The satisfactory goals we have are to achieve a greater good. And our highest good is classified as the supreme good. Politics is a form of this good. But it cannot be classified as the supreme good because what is good for one may not be good for another.…

    • 2394 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Responsibility

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Aristotle’s theory of morality, Nicomachean Ethics, he surmises that all human activities aim at some end or good. There are three types of good, sensual (pleasure), political (noble virtues for citizens), of life of thought (contemplation) (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 51). He states “every scientific inquiry, and similarly every action and purpose may be said to aim at some good”. What he is saying is that everything has an end point which is something good. Everything we want to accomplish is for some good. The ends are many, and he goes on to say the end of the medical art I health, the end of the shipbuilding is a vessel, the end of strategy is victory, and the end of economics is wealth. One piece, to point out is Aristotle states there is a final end. For example some may think of money as an end, however, without something to purchase, money is meaningless. Working for example is an action not a goal, work is not the good, so what is the supreme end, what are you working to attain? “Perhaps happiness is the supreme good” (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 52).…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Discussion question 1 it discusses how Aristotle seems to have a low opinion of the pursuits of most people. In Book 1, Chapter 5 he mentions that “the many” who seek pleasure or gratification as the highest good are slaves to their passion and thus live a life like grazing animals. Aristotle suggests that such a life is not self-sufficient and unworthy of human beings. Do we agree with Aristotle’s statement? Why or why not? Do you understand why he would make such claims? I agree with Aristotle statement that he made about people who seek the pleasure and the gratification as the highest goods are living in a life like grazing animals. It seems to be that Aristotle has a very low assumption on people because of what they need to be happy.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    After introducing the principle causes (efficient, formal, material, final), Aristotle talks about chance and spontaneity in Book II, (Physics) for the purpose of investigating their place among the said causes. Aristotle bases his enquiry on the observation that in history, these terms are conflictive in their interpretation. Some people say that everything that we consider luck or spontaneity really has some underlying definite cause. Yet there are other people, such as Empedocles, who invoke chance when describing the physics of air; or some, who “ascribe this heavenly sphere and all the worlds to spontaneity” (196a 25). In setting out to elucidate the nature of these terms and their place among the causes, Aristotle contends that chance and spontaneity are not explanatory causes of their own, but concurrent causes. By drawing from Aristotle’s view on nature and deliberate intention, this essay sets out to develop a clear understanding of the term concurrent in relation to chance and spontaneity.…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle – Virtue EthicsMill – UtilitarianismKant – DeontologyConsequentialismNodding – Care Ethicswhat would you say is our principal or highest objective by nature?…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Incontinence is doing the wrong thing and knowing that you are doing it. That is why reasoning is a cause that correlates with incontinence. Appetite can also be a cause for incontinence since that the appetite for something can make you do the unthinkable without even second guessing what you are doing.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays