Soda Ban Pros And Cons
As Sarah Conly states, “It’s hard to give up the idea of ourselves as completely rational. We feel as if we lose some dignity. But that’s the way it is, and there’s no dignity in clinging to an illusion,” (“Three Cheers for the Nanny State”). In other words, people think that they are logical and know right from wrong. This is the top reason for this controversy. The soda ban is an idea that was stated in New York when Major Bloomberg decided to restrict extra large soda sizes. This created a split between the people who are for this regulation and the people who are opposing it. The soda ban is a good idea because it benefits public health and it helps people make unbiased decisions. For example, the soda ban benefits public health. As stated
…show more content…
According to the opinion piece, “Three Cheers for the Nanny State,” by Sarah Conly, “This has been the object of an enormous amount of study over the past few decades, and what has been discovered is that we are all prone to identifiable and predictable miscalculations.” Conly proves that people can make mistakes because we are all human. The soda ban helps people make better decisions because they are informed of their opinions. In the article, “Pop Science: The Case for and Against the Soda Ban,” by Liz Neporent, it states that “studies show people tend to underestimate the amount of calories they’ve eaten and eat more when served heftier portions.” Neporent shows that along with the consumption of soda, people tend to eat more when their portions are larger causing them to consume more calories. People miscalculate how much calories they are consuming and believe that they are not eating much. To summarize, people make better decisions when they are informed so enforcing the soda ban gives them the information they …show more content…
These people do not know that their choices are not being taken away; the soda ban regulates the amount of soda a person can have or buy. People still get the choice to drink soda and pick what size they want, since the ban does not forbid soda. As stated by Liz Neporent in her article, “Pop Science: The Case for and Against the Soda Ban,” she explains how, “In shrinking soda servings down from the current default container size of 20 ounces to a more “human-sized” 16 ounces…” This shows that the ban would only restrain 20 ounce soda bottles, but it would allow a person to drink 16 ounces. For this, people can still drink soda, but end up drinking less, which would better their health. In summary, people feel that if the soda ban is put into place, their rights will be taken away, but in reality, only some soda sizes are
According to the opinion piece, “Three Cheers for the Nanny State,” by Sarah Conly, “This has been the object of an enormous amount of study over the past few decades, and what has been discovered is that we are all prone to identifiable and predictable miscalculations.” Conly proves that people can make mistakes because we are all human. The soda ban helps people make better decisions because they are informed of their opinions. In the article, “Pop Science: The Case for and Against the Soda Ban,” by Liz Neporent, it states that “studies show people tend to underestimate the amount of calories they’ve eaten and eat more when served heftier portions.” Neporent shows that along with the consumption of soda, people tend to eat more when their portions are larger causing them to consume more calories. People miscalculate how much calories they are consuming and believe that they are not eating much. To summarize, people make better decisions when they are informed so enforcing the soda ban gives them the information they …show more content…
These people do not know that their choices are not being taken away; the soda ban regulates the amount of soda a person can have or buy. People still get the choice to drink soda and pick what size they want, since the ban does not forbid soda. As stated by Liz Neporent in her article, “Pop Science: The Case for and Against the Soda Ban,” she explains how, “In shrinking soda servings down from the current default container size of 20 ounces to a more “human-sized” 16 ounces…” This shows that the ban would only restrain 20 ounce soda bottles, but it would allow a person to drink 16 ounces. For this, people can still drink soda, but end up drinking less, which would better their health. In summary, people feel that if the soda ban is put into place, their rights will be taken away, but in reality, only some soda sizes are