Preview

Socratic Method

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
962 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socratic Method
The Socratic Method is a method that not many people know about, yet they practice it. To learn about the Socratic Method, we should first learn about Socrates, the one who invented this method. Socrates was one of the most important philosophers, and by that, one of the most difficult to understand. Most of his life and teachings were adapted into the later ages and cultures. However, Socrates didn’t write anything. We know most of his philosophies from his disciple, Plato. Socrates was born in 469 BCE. His father was a sculptor and his mother was a midwife. He later followed his mother’s profession in being a “midwife to ideas”. Enough about Socrates, let’s talk about his method.
One may ask, what is the Socratic Method? According to dictionary.com, the Socratic Method is “the use of questions, as employed by Socrates, to develop a latent idea, as in the mind of a pupil, or to elicit admissions, as from an opponent, tending to establish a proposition”. It’s basically, a technique where one asks questions in order for the person to think deeply and elaborate their answers. It’s a discussion about a different point of view of a certain topic to open their mind in to thinking “outside the box”, and broaden the horizon of the persons listening. But Socrates did not question his disciples over and over again till they understood. He believed in self-improvement, this way they continue to search for knowledge. As I researched about this method ignorance was a common word I came across. For example, ignorance is bliss and ignorance sprouts desire. Most people today are ignorant to many things in life. Socrates admitted that he was ignorant but had a beautiful way of thinking. This means that he knew he was ignorant to many things; therefore he had the drive to search constantly for knowledge. Though he was a world renowned philosopher he considered himself to have the same knowledge as everyone around him. He especially learned from the students he taught and from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Apology by Plato

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    For the majority of his life, Socrates spent a good deal of his time asking questions of the people of Athens. His goal was to arrive at a set of political and ethical truths. Contrary to many people at the time, Socrates did not lecture about the things he knew; he actually claimed to be rather ignorant. He claimed he was wise only because he recognized his ignorance and did not claim to know what he did not know (Grube 26). The questions Socrates asked forced his audiences to think through a problem and arrive at a logical conclusion. At times, the answers seemed so obvious his opponents often looked foolish. His “Socratic Method” of questioning as it came to be called later, was adored by Socrates’ followers but despised by others throughout Athens (“Socrates Biography.”).…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanism In Greek Art

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pre-Socratics used rational thought to explain their world; if nature causes it, nature can cure it. They tried to explain natural occurrences without the use of religion. The Sophists suspected that Absolute Truths and Ideals are relative to the individual; they are not set by a higher power, but we decide them ourselves with our own human ideas and experiences. This idea seems to put a lot of power in our hands. Socrates, the father of philosophy, used the Socratic Method to teach; he asked questions, allowing students to use their own prior knowledge to form answers, looking within to find truth. His student Plato’s story, “The Cave,” emphasizes that humans may independently take the intellectual journey to enlightenment, reach the Realm of Perfect Forms, and discover truth for themselves. Both teacher and student insisted that Man himself had to reach truth, as it is not received from a higher…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates does not in fact tell his associates anything, but rather helps them understand ideas that were already in them through his series of questions that test whether what his associate says is of truth or not, and so he is not actually giving any knowledge. In the Meno, he shows an example of what he does when he attempts to “bring forth” geometry knowledge from a Greek slave boy. The boy answers some questions incorrectly at first before stating that he does not know. Socrates then continues to ask the boy more questions, and as the boy answers them, he comes to understand it without Socrates ever actually telling the boy anything at all. Socrates then states that “Then he will have knowledge without being taught by anyone but only questioned, since he will have recovered the knowledge from inside himself” (Meno, 85c-85d). He is saying that the boy is able to gain knowledge from Socrates asking him multiple questions about it constantly, and it will come forth within his associates, without him actually telling them anything at all. He also elaborates on this type of wisdom that he has in the Apology, saying “I thought this man seemed wise to many people, and especially to himself, but wasn’t. Then I tried to show him that he thought himself wise, but wasn’t.” (Apology, 21c-21e). Here, Socrates is stating that he has no knowledge, but rather questions the ideas of his associates to help them become more wise. This also showcases the type of wisdom that he does possess, which is knowing that he does not know…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonard Nelson in a critical essay defines the Socratic method as “the art of teaching not philosophy but philosophizing, the art not of teaching about philosophers but of making philosophers of the students” (Nelson). Socrates way of teaching was not simply telling his students something directly and having them accept an answer without doubt like most straightforward teachers of the time did, but rather to propose a question or series of questions and see what his students had to say about it. Socrates would listen to his student’s arguments and either gun down their answers or show an example, which obviously contradicts and proves their ideas wrong. As an example, in The Republic, Polemarchus is arguing with Socrates that it is the right thing to do harm to those who do evil to you. Socrates rejects his answer by telling a horse analogy which he says that harming a bad horse will only make the horse worse, therefore it is not right to do return evil for evil. With his questions, he helped his listeners realize that they lacked a full understanding of the topic they were discussing. Socrates did not teach his own ideas and beliefs. Through his method, he acted as a type of catalyst for others to search and find the truth for themselves. Socrates peculiar teaching method was radically different than those methods of his time and proves another reason why Socrates was a very intriguing…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates lived a life of inquiry in order to achieve a fulfilled life of eudaimonia and success. I argue that the Socratic examined life is a process, which should be valued because it teaches one to be critical thinkers, and aids us in the understanding our true actions.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ancient Greek philosophers Socrates was a radical thinker of his time. Socrates (470-399 B.C.) was an Athenian philosopher who believed in questioning life (Doc. 1). He did not want people to except things as they were and thought that things were meant to be pondered upon. The Socratic seminar is a teaching method that was developed based on Socrates’ quote “The unexamined life is not worth living” (Doc.1). A Socratic seminar is made up of a group of people who are presented with an open-ended question that they may add to or…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the information that we learn about Socrates comes from the work and writings of one of his students, Plato. It has been alleged that the great Philosopher wrote nothing down for others to read, and as such, the knowledge and the teachings from Socrates that is relied upon to convey his philosophy and the epic story of his life comes not from himself, but his students who attempt to provide and accurate picture of the methods and philosophical beliefs held by their mentor and teacher.…

    • 2097 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Laches

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Through a method of elenchus, Socrates aimed to prove to his interlocutor that the ideas they held about certain topics were in fact false. When a person would come to him with a question, as Laches and Nicias do in Laches, Socrates would first direct the conversation in such a way that the question lying before the men is a foundational one, and not necessarily the original question. In his explanation of this Socrates states, “So, in a word, whenever a man considers a thing for the sake of another thing, he is taking counsel about that thing for the sake of which he was considering, and not about what he was investigating for the sake of something else” (Plato 185D) and redirects the question of whether or not young boys should learn the art of fighting in armor to how to care for the souls of young men. By doing this Socrates is able to expose the very source of his interlocutors’ belief system and demonstrate that if the basis of the system isn’t true nothing built on it can be true. Socrates goes on to…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Socratic Method is what Socrates used to prove the oracle wrong. Socrates simply set out to ask people a series of questions. These men were people…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Socratic Method is a form of teaching or arguing that is executed by asking leading questions to someone rather than just stating a conclusion or opinion outright. The broad goal of the Socratic Method is to ultimately have the person who is being asked the questions personally figure out, disagree with, or agree with whatever it is that is being debated by themselves. Such a method, which is adopted by Socrates in The Republic, is essential in philosophy because it is the only way to acquire wisdom or insight-virtues that cannot be physically or verbally transferred to another-is from within. Socrates believes that people have the raw materials within to figure out philosophical questions; they just need to channel them. That idea is the basis behind his belief that a teacher should not merely insert knowledge into an empty mind, but rather help individuals harness the raw materials they already posses to find "truths" in life. According to Socrates the human mind, much like the varying definitions of justice, is overwhelmed with confusion and jumble.…

    • 979 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The paradox of inquiry refers to an argument that arises in Plato’s Meno and is called Meno's paradox. Meno asks Socrates if inquiry is possible. On one hand, if an individual already knows what he or she is looking for, then there is no need for inquiry. However, if an individual does not know what he or she is looking for, then inquiry cannot begin. Therefore, this paradox seems to show that inquiry is either impossible or unnecessary. To answer this problem, Socrates introduces his Theory of Recollection. Socrates’ Theory of Recollection, saves learning from Meno’s paradox. Socrates’ method also ensures that virtue can be taught which makes people better.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Socrates: read a biography of him here: http://www.philosophypages.com/ph/socr.htm. Socrates is the teacher and speaks first. His role is to help his students reach enlightenment. He believed the best way to do this was through the dialectic method, also called the Socratic method (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method). Basically, Socrates asks probing questions, setting up situations that the student can respond to, usually with a yes or no response in Plato 's dialogues.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, in Plato’s Euthyphro, we see the Socratic Method of questioning being applied in a discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro. Plato writes, “Socrates: … Is the pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods? Euthyphro: I do not know what you mean, Socrates.” (Plato 11). This method of questioning and critical thinking is what Socrates applies to all the issues that he is faced with, which is why it’s referred to as the Socratic Method. This method does not only apply to words or ideas, it can be applied to anything to find the deeper reasoning behind every belief. The Socratic Method is one of the most important aspects of Socrates’ lifestyle that causes him to act as a gadfly to society. Second, Socrates’ strength in evaluating information was admitting his ignorance when it came to what he didn’t know, while others attempted to act as though they already knew the answer to the problem. In The Apology, Socrates writes, “… It is likely that neither of us knows anything worthwhile, but he thinks he knows something when he does not, whereas when I do not know , neither do I think I know” (Plato 25). The acceptance of his ignorance allows for him to seek the truth and find it for himself rather than accepting what others tell him. He…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socratic, is an opinion always worthy of attention. The difficulty with the Socratic definition is that it leaves undetermined how ignorance itself is to be more precisely understood, the question of its origin, ect.<br><br>That is to say. even if sin be ignorance(or what Christianity would perhaps prefer to call stupidity), which in one sense cannot be denied we have to ask, is this an original ignorance, it is always the case that one has not known and hitherto could not know anything about the truth, or is it a superinduced, a subsequent ignorance? If it is the last question implies, then sin must have its grond in the activity with which a man has labored…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    humanities terms

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ostracism- a method of temporary banishment by popular vote without trial or special accusation practiced in ancient Greece…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays