Preview

Socrates Vs Plato

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1432 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Vs Plato
The Republic, by Plato discusses human morality and the difference between justice and injustice. Socrates is challenged by his peers to explain his views on the topic, which he claims that being just is the function of the soul. He is then confronted by more students who suggest that unjust humans have a better life than those who are just. To respond to this Socrates decides to create a city called Kallipollis in order to demonstrate why being just is beneficial to everyone in a society instead of just the weak. The Kallipolis is to be divided into three parts, the masses, the auxiliaries, and the rulers. These three separate sects will allow the city to run efficiently and to its highest potential. Each class will represent a different part …show more content…
The philosopher proposes that in order to ensure that the guardians of the city have no self-interest, they will be educated and brainwashed to believe that their purpose in life is to serve the city. He plans to convince the guardians that, “It is impious for them to defile their divine possession by possessing an admixture of mortal gold, because many impious deeds have been done for the sake of the currency of the masses.” Socrates believes that humans are not naturally greedy, so by telling the guardians that they possess a divine spirit from the gods it will prevent them from taking actions to enhance their own social standings. A society in which the higher classes, such as the auxiliaries and rulers, look to improve the city and serve the masses is one that is undeniably ideal, as often individuals with power use it for selfish means. To establish who will be the rulers Socrates suggests that he wants the “best of the guardians” to be rulers and believes that, “A person would care most for what [they] loved…and [they] would love something most if [they] thought the same thing were advantageous…we would choose the men who seem… to be most inclined to do what they believe is advantageous for the city.” In deciding who will actually get to ascend to the ruler class, Socrates will choose those who demonstrate the most love for the city, and a propensity for doing what is right for the masses. These individuals would be trained in the ways of politics and brainwashed into completely believing that what is best for the city is best for themselves. The rulers of the Kallipolis would hold no ideologies except a belief that their purpose in life was to serve the city and this is extremely ideal for the masses and overall health of the society. A city where the guardians and rulers put their own egos aside to correctly represent the inhabitants is an ideal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates proposes a “myth of the metals” the ideal city’s citizens must acknowledge. These citizens accept their respective positions so as to maintain the social and political order, or, as Socrates articulates, to prevent revolution (422a). The “myth of the metals”, or the “noble lie”, emphasizes the importance of each individual fulfilling a specific function, which allows them to practice what Socrates and his peers have defined as justice (346d). Socrates propositions this “necessary falsehood” and “single, grand lie which will be believed by everybody” (414b-c) to promote a sense of unity among the ideal city’s citizens. This unity serves to advance Socrates’s other aims. The primary purposes of the “myth of the metals” are to preserve…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theme of justice is prevalent throughout the dialogue of "the Republic", as Socrates seems to be on a mission to discover "what exactly is the good life?", and if it encompasses being just or unjust. His journey is sparked when the oracle of Delphi prophesizes his future to be the wisest man…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Socrates is asked to defend justice on its own, but not for the reputation that it brings, he suggests that justice should be found in the city before starting to use the analogy of finding it in an individual. He then uses an example of a just city that aims at satisfying the basic human wants. Some citizens enter into political welfare as no one is independent. Nevertheless,…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his philosophy, Plato places a large emphasis on the importance of the idea of justice. This emphasis can be seen especially in his work ‘The Republic’ where, through his main character Socrates, he attempts to define the nature of justice and to justify this definition. One of the methods used by Socrates to strengthen or rather explain his argument on justice is through his famous city-soul analogy, where a comparison between a just city and a just soul/individual is made. Through this analogy, Socrates attempts to explain the nature of justice, how it is the virtue of the soul and is therefore intrinsically valuable to the individual, but it becomes apparent in the analysis and evaluation of the analogy that there may have been several purposes behind it. Inconsistencies within the analogy itself also raise questions to the validity in Plato’s definition and justification of justice.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato Vs Aphrodite

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As I was reading through the chapters of my art book, there were two pieces of art that caught my eye: the statue of "Nefertiti" and the statue "Aphrodite of Melos." After researching both artworks, I realized that these statues…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Socrates

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thrasymachus argues for the view that justice is the advantage of the powerful – that it is “simply the interest of the stronger” (Plato’s The Republic, translated by Richard W. Sterling and William C. Scott, page 35). Laws, he says, are specifically “designed to serve the interests of the ruling class” (36). Of course, the ruling class is the strongest class, so it follows that the laws serve the advantage of the strong. The citizens under the ruling class serve “interests [of their strong unjust ruler] and his happiness at the expense of their own” (41). Thrasymachus concludes that “the dynamics of justice, then, consistently operate to advantage the ruler but never the subjects” (41).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The most intriguing people you will encounter in this life are the people who had insights about you, that you didn't know about yourself” (Alder). This quote can be used to show why the great Greek philosopher, Socrates is deemed as being so intriguing. During his time, Socrates was seen as a great threat because he tended to break free from the normal way of thinking and inevitably, people became afraid of him. Socrates was eventually put to death on account of “corrupting the youth” and being an “atheist,” which were false claims against him to cover up the fact that his accusers simply didn’t like him or his ways. When reading Plato’s Republic, Socrates is shown as being very intriguing because of: his humble ways, his Socratic method,…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato vs Isocrates

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Plato encouraged in his writings that the view that sophists were concerned with was “the manipulative aspects of how humans acquire knowledge.” (Lecture) Sophists believed that only provisional or probable knowledge was available to humans but both Plato and Isocrates did not agree with a lot of what the Sophists had to say. They both believed in wisdom and having a connection with rhetoric but vary in defining wisdom in itself. Wisdom for Socrates and Plato is having an understanding of speech, knowledge of truth and being able to question the speaker in order to seek and reveal truth. Isocrates defined wisdom as having a sense of integrity and character along with the ambition and ability to speak well with others.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Vs King

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    King references philosophical literature and political theory to explain his push for Civil Rights within the south. During the speech Dr. King references Socrates, utilizing Plato’s work in which Socrates is found challenging the thoughts of individuals through a series of questions and answers. The Socratic Method would be used so that citizens can challenge their own preconceived thoughts in a non-threating way. Non-violence protests were a tool that King used forcing individuals in the South to think about where they stood on the issue of Civil Rights. King follows this by referencing political history explaining that no political ruler ever gave up power willingly. This can be deduced from the Monarchs of Europe to the Military leaders…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Plato

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What does it mean to be moral? This is the question that Plato has tried to answer in the passages from his famous work the Republic. He has attempted to explain how humans can define and live morally, a task that is truly complicated and uncertain. It is important to identify morality because it plays a crucial role in formulating ethical theories. As Socrates states, "we are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live."…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What will they think if Socrates is not in charge of his kids? Socrates contends that the conclusion of a specialist is more essential than the sentiment of the dominant part. He gives the sample of somebody in preparing. Such a man does not pay consideration on the counsel of the overall population, however to his coach. In the event that he listened to popular assessment (take steroids, eat whatever you need, train 20 hours a day), he could hurt his body. Socrates extends the relationship to settling on what the right route is to act. On the off chance that we listen to the larger part instead of specialists we could hurt our souls, the some portion of us that is mangled by wrong activities and profited by right ones(Crito, 47a-48a). Socrates concedes that as a greater part, the overall population has the ability to kill individuals, yet he expresses that the most essential thing is not living, but rather carrying on with a decent life, so it is not worth after the assessment of the dominant part in the event that it means relinquishing something that is critical for living a decent life.(48b) . The above is one of Socrates' most key standards - that the truly critical thing is not to live but rather to live well. Thusly he considers whether it is ethically right to pay off the watchmen and escape. Socrates starts considering so as to tend to this issue the results for the city of Athens. He says that the laws and the city could be crushed on the off chance that he got away. Lawful judgments could lose their power in the event that they were invalidated by private nationals, and a city without laws would not stay in place for…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that Oedipus was great leader and king compared to modern politician. Oedipus has proven to be a good leader. He had ruled the country for 15 years and solved many problem that people in the Thebes had. He cared about his people and their problems. Once Oedipus realized that his kingdom is facing a big problem, he quickly took action and started trying to fix the problems. Oedipus sent his brother in law, Creon to find out what causes the problem and sent Tiresias along for help. This is a one of the value of being a good leader; getting the things done as soon as possible and another quality is that he is open to his people. That shows when Creon and Tiresias came back and asked him if they can speak to him privately and he refused…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone vs. Socrates

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the plays Antigone and the Crito the two lead characters, Antigone and Socrates, showed completely different ideas regarding their responsibilities to the State. Antigone believes in divine law and does what she thinks that the Gods would want her to do. Socrates, on the other hand, believes that he owes it to the State to follow their laws whether he thinks they are right or not.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato vs. Nietzsche

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The central ideas that two great philosophers, Plato and Friedrich Nietzsche, talked about were the reality and appearance; and what they mainly focused on is where we as humans stand between these two. Of course, regarding the fact that Plato and Nietzsche lived in different time periods, they had their differences that conflict with each other’s theories. But they do have something to agree upon; they both argue that humans live in an illusory world of our own that we think is reality when we actually are not. One important idea they disagree on is their concepts on what is reality and what is truth. Plato’s theory is mostly based on his cave allegory where he explains human’s conditions. I will explain the similarities and differences between Plato and Nietzsche through the cave allegory.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jesus vs Socrates

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates, known as the famous Greek philosopher and one of the wisest people around, was looked at as being a very strong willed and “stand-by-his-opinion” kind of man. Jesus, on the other hand, was a man who went through his life not by blatantly expressing and sharing his wisdom, but by making his “students” think things through for themselves in order to gain understanding and wisdom in certain topics. Based on what is known about Jesus and Socrates, two major moral figures in the world, it is hard to comprehend the major similarities that they obtain with one another because of their radical differences on how they lived their lives focusing on the way in which they were raised, what exactly they were standing up for and the way in which their lives ended because of it.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays