Preview

Socrates Vs Meno

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1399 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Vs Meno
I will argue that acquiring virtue is seen at both the cognitive level and the level of the heart. In this paper I will be showing that virtue can be found on both levels by examining the characteristics of two different characters in the philosophical works of Plato. These two characters are Meno and Socrates, from the dialogues Meno and Apology. Meno is Thessalian general that had the main goal in life to get rich and have power. He did not care about anyone else besides himself, and could not take anyone seriously (Xenophon). Socrates on the other hand was a Greek philosopher that was put on trial for corrupting the youth of Athens, was accused of being a Sophists, and genuinely wanted to know truth and knowledge because it leads to a happy …show more content…
In the process of learning about virtue at both levels, Socrates also teaches about virtue. Although in the Apology, Socrates claims he is not a teacher, “And if you have heard from anyone that I undertake to teach people and charge a fee for it, that is not true either” (Apology, 19d), he is actually teaching people just by his questioning. Socrates is searching for what virtue is on the cognitive level because he has an actual love for wisdom, and believes knowledge and wisdom will better your soul. “For I go around doing nothing but persuading both young and old among you not to care for your body or your wealth in preference to or as strongly as for the best possible state of your soul…(Apology, 30b). This shows us that Socrates in genuine for wanting to know what virtue is on a cognitive level because knowing what virtue is will better his soul. In the Meno, Socrates questions almost everything Meno says about virtue, and demands a proper definition of it. He even gets frustrated at Meno over it, “Because I begged you just now not to break up or fragment virtue, and I gave examples of how you should answer. You paid no attention…” (Meno, 79b). Socrates is getting frustrating at this point in the dialogue because Meno will not tell him what virtue actually means, or if he truly does not know what it means. During the back and forth arguments between Meno and Socrates while trying to determine the meaning of virtue, Socrates is unintentionally teaching Meno. Every time Socrates questioned Meno or his definitions, it made Meno take a step back and have to think about what he was saying. This lead Meno to have to further explain himself, or completely change his train of thought. This type of teaching that Socrates is demonstrating focuses more on questioning then giving answers. It makes the student do some of their own critical thinking and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ unique wisdom can be likened to that of a midwife, as stated in Theaetetus. In Meno, Socrates discusses the definition of virtue with the titular character. Socrates challenges Meno to define virtue, and Meno states that each demographic has a different virtue, for example, “a man’s virtue: to take part in the city’s affairs capably…”(Meno, 71e-72a) or “there is a different…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Secondly, Meno formulates a broad and imperfect definition. He regards virtue as the acquisition of beautiful things in the context of a type of virtue - justice. Thirdly, Meno failed to look, which uncovers his dangerous hold of self-esteem. He is only concerned with a specific and corollary question: "can virtue be taught?” rather than searching for the answer to the original and ultimate question: "what is virtue?”…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno Paradox

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If Meno were a Know-It-All on the subject of virtue, according to Meno’s paradox, Socrates’ questions should not have impacted him at all, and yet he seems impacted. The possibility that Meno superficially, not totally, understands the concept of virtue, is not a possibility for which Meno’s paradox allows. Socrates’ questions, then, move Meno from confident knowledge to a recognition of his own limitations, a movement which should not have been possible were Meno’s paradox valid. Additionally, Meno’s continued participation in the dialogue suggests an intellectual surrender of his paradox since his participation implies an investment in adding to his own…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    C. in Athens, Greece, it focuses primarily on personal character and the development of certain virtuous character traits. To act well in various circumstances by doing the right thing is the center focus of a person’s character traits as in their self-control, courage, wisdom, honesty and respect that makes the person what they are over time. This life of a virtuously ethical person emphasizes achieving human excellence by always doing the right thing, the mere meaning of virtue from both the Latin and Greek culture means “excellence”, to be a model citizen and is founded on the assumption that the purpose of life was to achieve happiness and fulfillment. Aristotle though, has the most prolific virtue ethics theory, he held that understanding the meaning of a virtue was necessary but not sufficient to make one virtuous and that there are many specific virtues: intellectual, and moral, whereas moral virtues are those we would need in order to conduct affairs in daily life such as self-control, courage, gentleness and wittiness. Intellectual virtue reflects what is unique and important about human nature, human reasoning and rationality, calmness, wisdom and knowledge to name a few. Virtue ethics is the embodiment of being all you can be by making the most of our talents and…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Meno is the literary work done by Socrates the main theme in this dialogue/story is what is virtue. The dialogue between Meno and Socrates gives insight and question on what it is. It begins with Meno telling Socrates that he has been under the spell of Socrates and that he did not know what virtue was. This is what started the whole conversation between the boy, Meno, and Socrates. First off Socrates asks Meno what virtue is Meno listed examples about virtue but he did not the exact definition. Instead Socrates uses an analogy with the priestess and priests of who believe that people have an immortal soul. He also then uses the torpedo fish, which is a metaphor for when people are “paralyzed” by for being confused and having inconsistent.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrates has “numbed” Meno’s mind and essentially made him feel stupid. “In response to Meno, Socrates says he is willing to accept the torpedo-fish simile so long as it is true that the torpedo fish numbs not only other fish but also itself. “I myself do not have the answer when I perplex others,” he…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What exacty is virtue and how does one describe it? In the dialog Meno, two men, Meno and Socrates, attempt to define virtue. The dialog begins with Meno asking Socrates if virtue can be taught. Personally, I do not imagine that virtue can be taught. Meno does not exactly know what virtue is but guesses that it is to possess power and to retain good things. Socrates argues that learning is impossible because a soul has already learned everything from passed lives and that learning is simply recollection from those past lives. The purpose of this paper is to discuss Meno’s paradox and to determine how Socrates resolves it.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Socrates

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thrasymachus argues for the view that justice is the advantage of the powerful – that it is “simply the interest of the stronger” (Plato’s The Republic, translated by Richard W. Sterling and William C. Scott, page 35). Laws, he says, are specifically “designed to serve the interests of the ruling class” (36). Of course, the ruling class is the strongest class, so it follows that the laws serve the advantage of the strong. The citizens under the ruling class serve “interests [of their strong unjust ruler] and his happiness at the expense of their own” (41). Thrasymachus concludes that “the dynamics of justice, then, consistently operate to advantage the ruler but never the subjects” (41).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonard Nelson in a critical essay defines the Socratic method as “the art of teaching not philosophy but philosophizing, the art not of teaching about philosophers but of making philosophers of the students” (Nelson). Socrates way of teaching was not simply telling his students something directly and having them accept an answer without doubt like most straightforward teachers of the time did, but rather to propose a question or series of questions and see what his students had to say about it. Socrates would listen to his student’s arguments and either gun down their answers or show an example, which obviously contradicts and proves their ideas wrong. As an example, in The Republic, Polemarchus is arguing with Socrates that it is the right thing to do harm to those who do evil to you. Socrates rejects his answer by telling a horse analogy which he says that harming a bad horse will only make the horse worse, therefore it is not right to do return evil for evil. With his questions, he helped his listeners realize that they lacked a full understanding of the topic they were discussing. Socrates did not teach his own ideas and beliefs. Through his method, he acted as a type of catalyst for others to search and find the truth for themselves. Socrates peculiar teaching method was radically different than those methods of his time and proves another reason why Socrates was a very intriguing…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Vs King

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    King references philosophical literature and political theory to explain his push for Civil Rights within the south. During the speech Dr. King references Socrates, utilizing Plato’s work in which Socrates is found challenging the thoughts of individuals through a series of questions and answers. The Socratic Method would be used so that citizens can challenge their own preconceived thoughts in a non-threating way. Non-violence protests were a tool that King used forcing individuals in the South to think about where they stood on the issue of Civil Rights. King follows this by referencing political history explaining that no political ruler ever gave up power willingly. This can be deduced from the Monarchs of Europe to the Military leaders…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As Meno begins his questionnaire, Socrates asks Meno to reiterate Gorgias’ definition of virtue. He proudly defines virtue as the ability for a man and a women to complete their rightful duties and continues on my saying that virtues is different for all. Socrates immediately rejects this idea by explaining to Meno that he is describing the different kinds…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the reading CRITO the verdict of execution has already been given and now Socrates and colleagues must make the decision to flee the city of Athens or stay and face his fate. In this conversation you have Critos point of view and Socrates. Based on Critos reasoning he states three reasons why Socrates should stay, the first two being selfish but the third hitting home.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, our customary thinking rightly expects more from such individuals than insignificant great expectations, since for example reckless individuals can be good natured yet may be blameworthy of carelessness of the most noticeably bad sort. If excellence is to acquire good things justly, and if justice is a kind of excellence, Meno has simply repeated his previous mistake of using kinds of excellence to define excellence itself. Socrates' clarification sets up that when he and Meno talk about people seeking bad things, they mean individuals who desire to get bad things. In this manner Socrates can ask Meno once more, in this more exact way, whether individuals can desire to get bad things in instances of both obliviousness and learning. To this more exact inquiry, Meno emphasizes that both cases are conceivable “There are some who desire to get bad things thinking that bad things are beneficial, and others as well, who desire to get bad things knowing that bad things cause harm.”(77d)…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meno's Dialogue

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I have always been fascinated at the idea of the saying: “if at first you don’t succeed, try try again.” Learning to me has always been upon the idea of problem solving, that we must attempt to figure out the truth while stumbling upon questions and false answers. In Meno’s dialogue with Socrates, Meno attempts to ask Socrates if virtue can be acquired. Expecting a bold and grand statement as heard upon by his sophist peers from Thessaly, Meno was amazed to hear that Socrates had no clue to his question, even going further by stating that Socrates hasn’t met anyone who knows what virtue is. While in their quest to find out if virtue can be acquired by teaching, they struggle through the logic behind it. Meno points out by defining virtue as a list: “there will be no difficulty, Socrates, in answering your question. Let us take first the virtue of a man-he should know how to administer the state, and in the administration of it to benefit his friends and harm his enemies. A woman’s virtue, if you wish to know about that, may also be easily described her duty is to order her house, and keep what is indoors, and obey her husband. Every age, every condition of life, young or old, male or female, bond or free, has a different virtue: there are virtues numberless, and no lack of definitions of them; for virtue is relative to the actions and ages of each of us in all that we do”. But Socrates manages to debunk this error with his example of Meno’s list of virtues being like a swarm of bees. A second attempt by Meno makes the same mistake as the first, as Meno manages to say that health is a virtue: “I should say that health is the same, both in man and woman.” A third attempt at defining what virtue also comes up empty handed. After coming up with no luck, Meno states that he feels numb and confused, and this is known in the story as paradox of inquiry. The paradox states that learning isn’t possible, because you either…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics