Preview

Socrates Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
462 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Essay
Socrates Essay
Brian Isaac
PHI/105
May 21, 2012

Most people know the word “knowledge” to mean something that individuals acquire through experience or education, but is there a deeper meaning to this word. Is knowledge something that most of us already have installed deep down within?

Socrates believed that a person cannot come to know something they have no knowledge of what to look for. Socrates do not think that learning comes from discovering. He believes that knowledge comes from the soul, which took place before birth. Also, Socrates further believes that our recollection of knowledge is buried within, but forgotten until something in our lives happen and brings the buried knowledge back to surface.

To further make sense of Socrates’s idea, he used an example to prove his point. Socrates used one of Meno’s slaves and drew a square. Each side of the square was two feet. Socrates asked the slave to calculate how long the square would be if it had twice the area of the first one drawn. The slave’s first response was four feet, then three, but he was incorrect each time. So, Socrates helped the slave distinguish that a square that consist of twice the area would have sides with a length that is equal to the diagonal of the square of questioning. However, he helped the slave understand this point without really explaining how to get the correct answer. Socrates helped the slave by pushing him to concentrate and think the problem through by himself. So, his exampled proved that the boy could reach a conclusion on his own without Socrates directing him. This was Socrates’s way of proving that knowledge could be recollected from something a person already knows.

Socrates believed that the slave used his recollection of math, and that the slave already knew how to solve the problem, because it was something that his soul learned in the past life. I think that Socrates ideas was interesting, but I do not agree with them, because I



References: Moore, B.N., & Bruder, K. (2011). Philosophy:The power of ideas (8th ed.). Retrieved from University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moore, B., & Bruder, K. (2008). Philosophy: the power of ideas (7th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved May 26,…

    • 289 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno's Geometric Argument

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the Meno, Socrates tries to walk Meno through the discovery of if virtue can be taught. Along the way they come across the theory that if virtue can be taught then it is knowledge. If knowledge then it can be taught but the Geometric argument was brought up where a person can have the capacity to learn based on their previous life and their soul conjuring up prior knowledge to understand the topic. Socrates called upon a slave, a person who has no formal education and walked him through a geometry problem. This problem was meant to illustrate that a person’s knowledge is not based on what this person has learned in their lifetime but their capacity and ability to understand is based on what their soul has learned in previous lifetimes. Socrates uses this example show his thesis is true but what about different scenarios that aren’t math based and through different problems you can see that Socrates theory is half correct and that there are several implications that prove that souls don’t know it all.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Socrates did not always think that he was wise, many people labeled him as a teacher. Socrates did not really care for this label. He did not really think that he knew much. Socrates had a friend named Chaerephon who went to the oracle the God of Delphi. Cheaerephon asked the oracle is there any one wiser then Socrates, the oracle answered no (21a). Socrates did not understand this and set out to prove the oracle wrong. While out to prove the oracle wrong Socrates realized he is wise but not because he knew everything, but because he realized he knew nothing and didn’t act as if he did.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates introduces the concept of the divided line, which has four segments that refers to different levels of cognitive activities. It seems like that the divided levels works as a method of accessing one's intellect. According to Socrates, imagination is located at the very bottom of the line and belief is located right above imagination; these two segments represent the accessibility to the visible realm. Moreover, understanding is placed at the top of the line and thought is located right below understanding; and these two levels represent the accessibility to the intelligible. Socrates indicates that people in the imagination level barely has any knowledge.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After observing the unchangeable nature of Meno, Socrates uses his last attempt to differentiate between true knowledge and right opinion, which can lead to similar action and outcomes. His vital note is that right opinion is easy to lose, but true knowledge can be recollected at any time. A person can listen to another's teaching without pondering and assume that he knows the knowledge behind it, while he only possesses transient right opinion, like Meno's receipt of Gorgias's ideas. However, he will never grasp the real knowledge, which will encompass all specific situations and stay within an industrious, pensive, and open…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthyphro is a story of a self-righteous man who’s taking his own father to court, and Socrates basically asks him how does he know if what he’s doing is the right thing. To which Euthyphro mindlessly replied, “I’m doing what is loved by the gods.” During their mid-conversation, Socrates posts a critical question: Is God then the source of what is right and what is wrong? Socrates basis for asking that question goes something like: is something is good because god commands it or does god commands something because it’s good.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonard Nelson in a critical essay defines the Socratic method as “the art of teaching not philosophy but philosophizing, the art not of teaching about philosophers but of making philosophers of the students” (Nelson). Socrates way of teaching was not simply telling his students something directly and having them accept an answer without doubt like most straightforward teachers of the time did, but rather to propose a question or series of questions and see what his students had to say about it. Socrates would listen to his student’s arguments and either gun down their answers or show an example, which obviously contradicts and proves their ideas wrong. As an example, in The Republic, Polemarchus is arguing with Socrates that it is the right thing to do harm to those who do evil to you. Socrates rejects his answer by telling a horse analogy which he says that harming a bad horse will only make the horse worse, therefore it is not right to do return evil for evil. With his questions, he helped his listeners realize that they lacked a full understanding of the topic they were discussing. Socrates did not teach his own ideas and beliefs. Through his method, he acted as a type of catalyst for others to search and find the truth for themselves. Socrates peculiar teaching method was radically different than those methods of his time and proves another reason why Socrates was a very intriguing…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Essay

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Moore, B. N., & Bruder, K. (2011) Philosophy: The Power Of Ideas. (8th ed.). New York, NY:…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    helloham

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Socrates is considered one of the greatest thinkers of all time. This was not because he was the most intelligent, but as he states in the Apology, it was because he knew he didn’t know everything. He enjoyed questioning people and getting them to think deeper and he would consider other’s opinions. He refers to himself as a gadfly that pesters the horse into action. This is the case in Plato’s Meno. Socrates is having a discussion with Meno on whether virtues are teachable. This conversation leads to what does it take for a man to be a success. Socrates states that there are two ways in which men succeed. They are though true knowledge and right opinion. Although there are differences between them, they both will lead to success.…

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates' demonstration with the slave boy, is an effort to use mathematical reasoning to illustrate the process and the importance of keeping an active mind. Simultaneously he is using mathematical reasoning to illustrate how a similar process of reasoning is used in virtually every decision that we make. When Socrates asks the slave boy to find the length of a side of the square with the area of 8, he finds that the answer can neither be 2, nor 3. The manner in which Socrates poses this question, is an attempt to demonstrate the human reasoning process. This process can be characterized by finding a low extreme, finding a high extreme, and coming to understand that the answer to your problem lies somewhere in the middle. The difficulty, which Socrates is clarifying in this situation, is that the extremes are easy to recognize and understand (just as whole numbers such as 2 and 3 are), and humans are prone to being satisfied with that which is easily recognizable. The concise answer is unreachable, the value lies in the process of seeking it, and eliminating that which is untrue, the way perhaps that a sculptor would gradually knock off pieces of a block. This is where the "torpedo's shock" comes into play. Lines are drawn dividing those that choose to stop seeking due to their desire for a concise answer that will never come, and those that dwell in their ignorance, attached to an answer with evidence disproving it. When talking about the impossibility of enquiry, Socrates says, "it will make us idle, and is sweet only to the sluggard." Here Socrates is stating that anyone or anything that contends it knows the truth in such a manner as to hinder this process of enquiry and reasoning, is neither morally or ethically responsible. Also, any answer that leaves us feeling satisfied entirely is a divergence from the truth.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-knowledge is the personal discovery of one’s world and oneself in relation to all things. Socrates examined the meaning and origin of self-knowledge in his speech in Phaedo by Plato. He explains to his fellows while he is in jail awaiting his execution that, “since I had had it with this looking into beings, it seemed to me I had to be on my guard so as not to suffer the very thing those people do who behold and look at the sun during an eclipse. For surely some of them have their eyes destroyed if they don’t look at the sun’s likeness in water or in some other such thing. I thought this sort of thing over and feared I might be totally soul-blinded if I looked at things with my eyes and attempted to grasp them by each of the senses. So it seemed to me that I should take refuge in accounts and look in them for the truth of beings” (Plato 99e). In this excerpt, Socrates is saying that we can understand ourselves not through observing the world around us, but by comparing accounts of truths to form hypotheses. He uses the simile of looking directly at the sun to explain what could happen to a soul if looking directly at the world. He says direct observation causes soul-blindness and the only way to gain self-knowledge is through comparing accounts. Socrates’ view of self-knowledge is that it is a compilation of accounts into hypotheses about the world.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To begin with, Socrates first questions whether true belief is something no less useful than knowledge. Socrates notes that true belief and knowledge guide to the true action. He illustrates the idea by an example. To clarify Socrates’s example, I will apply his example on our campus. Suppose I need to guide a friend to Chong Yuet Ming Physics Building. I have no idea where it locate and I haven’t been to there. Now, I can visit the building if someone with the knowledge of the path guides me there or I have the knowledge of the path. But a true belief, which may be the intuition, perception, will also be equally effective in reaching the destination. If my belief is that the destination is northwest of the main building, and I convince my friend to the destination. From an outside observer, he cannot distinguish whether I have the knowledge of the path or I just luckily arrive there according to my true belief. Socrates states that “correct opinion (true belief) is no less useful than knowledge” because no matter which proposition, either true belief or knowledge, someone’s action still can be guided correctly. Although I do not agree this statement, I will discuss it in later paragraph.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As noted by Warnek (2005), Socrates considered self-knowledge as necessity of life and also, an important ingredient to success. Socrates stated that every individual needs to attain self-knowledge which is acquired by studying every fact necessary for existence. Socrates believed that by possessing knowledge about what is right, individuals are most likely to perform good deeds and that the bad deeds in the society come from those who are ignorant of what is right and wrong. Socrates proposed that, by being aware of the spiritual and mental consequences of wrong actions, no individual would even consider engaging in such actions. According to Socrates, any individual who is aware of a truly right action will automatically choose it over the wrong one.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays