Preview

Socrates

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
456 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates
I. It is highly debatable how far an individual can truly separate the laws of a state

from the people who apply them. Socrates poses the question: should the individual

obey the state every time the state asks something of him or her? Socrates’ believes

that an individual of the state has an obligation to that state and its laws. However, in

return, the state cannot ask its citizens to do anything unjust. Socrates is willing to

disobey the laws of state because he is afraid to do anything unjust.

When Socrates is sentenced to the death penalty he replies by telling the jury

that there children are going to turn against them because they have put to death an

innocent person. He is confident he has done the right thing because, he says, he hears

a voice when he is about to do something wrong saying “don’t do it.” In his ending

speech he says that death may not be a punishment, maybe death is a never ending

sleep. Socrates states that a just person has nothing to fear and sooner or later the jury

will pay for being unjust.

When trying to convince Socrates to escape from jail, Crito tries to persuade

Socrates to believe that being in jail is unjust because his children will be orphaned.

Socrates deals with this issue by explaining that escaping would be unjust. He says,

one must accept the consequences as a person who breaks the law. He tells Crito that

his children will not in fact be orphaned because he has Crito to take care of them. If

Socrates were to escape, he says, that other people will perceive him as a breaker of

the law and not accept him with open arms as Crito tries to suggest.

Socrates also deals with this issue by stating that it is wrong to harm anyone and

when you harm someone you are also harming yourself. From this we are given the

pillars: no one does evil willingly, all evil is done in ignorance. In other words, no one

can ever knowingly do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and, Socrates hold altogether different assessments with regards to matters of obeying just laws and how unjust laws ought to be taken care of. I concur with Martin Luther King Jr's. way to deal with common defiance and I additionally agree that steps should be taken towards changing unjust laws. A nation's headway starts from the changing of laws – that is the delayed consequence of people going to stand up for what is right…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq- Han China and Greece

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document 9, a Greek philosopher names Socrates explains to one of his friends that citizens must obey and enforce the laws created by their government; if one does not…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article's of "Crito," by Plato, and "Letter from Birmingham Jail," by Martin Luther King, Jr., two writers make a case over whether it is moral or not to disobey laws. The question to be answered in our final paper asks whether we agree with what the Laws say about if Socrates was to escape and why we feel that way. It also asks how we think Martin Luther King would have responded to the judgment of the Laws of Athens. In this paper, I will address these questions as well as do a quick overview of each article.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates decided to face his execution throughout a long and thoughtful process to determine whether it would end up being just or unjust for him to escape. Crito tried all that he could to persuade…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A good citizen fights for justice. A good citizen resists unfair laws. And a good citizen also rebels to change the rules that they feel needs to be adjusted. Socrates in Plato’s Crito makes it a point that a good citizen follows the government of the place that raised them. His claim on why he fought for his right to go unpunished in Plato’s Apology is that he was hoping to create a change in the government, and this is a thoughtful favor for him to do because it is important that the members of a state are involved in politics and the government. Socrates was happy living where he was for about seventy years, so why would he be mad at the rules now? “You have had seventy years to think about [the laws], and during that time you were free…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that these laws has given him birth, have educated him, raised him and have shared the wealth of Athens with him. Socrates thinks that the people of Athens are free to leave if they find the laws unjust, but if they want to stay then they must abide by the laws of Athens. The only thing that he points out are the people in power. He thinks that the people who are in power have changed the original laws for their own benefit. “been wronged, not by the Laws, but by men” (p 54). Socrates accepts death penalty because he wants the laws should be remain in place. Given opportunities such as exile or apology, he argues that if he escape from the prison, it will destroy the laws of the city and, eventually, the city because according to Socrates no city can survive without its laws being enforced. Therefore, Socrates steadfast by his believes of not violating any…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    • 1. In the Apology, Socrates recounts how he disobeyed the unjust order of the Thirty Tyrants to arrest a fellow citizen; he also claims that he will never stop philosophizing, regardless of what the legally constituted political authority commands. Yet, in the Crito, Socrates provides numerous arguments for obeying the decision of the legally constituted political authority, even though the decision (to put Socrates to death) was unjust. Critically assess whether Socrates’s view about political obligation in the two texts is consistent.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King believes that certain preparations should occur before one participates in direct civil disobedience, including attempting to first negotiate; “In ANY non-violent campaign there ARE four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine if whether injustice exist, negotiation, self-purification and direct action”. These steps serve as a framework for correctly practicing civil disobedience, failing to abide by this framework neglects the alternatives to creating civil unrest. Mindful of the importance of negotiation in constructively breaking the law, Socrates forms his MAIN argument off of the inability to control the ensuing chaos if he WE re to break the law after failing to negotiate. While personifying the law, Socrates speaks for…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He must do this regardless of the opinion of the majority or possible consequences for himself; he must act only in accordance to the opinion of the few wise, knowledgeable men who understand what is justice, and the laws of the State. Unfortunately, in all of the dialogues the author of this essay has read5, Socrates never clearly explains what ‘the laws’ really are — they remain a sort of abstraction, a divine essence of justice. However, this does not invalidate our definition of a champion of…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Individuals won't realize that Socrates stayed in prison. They'll feel that it was workable for Crito to get Socrates out however that he didn't do it in light of the fact that he wasn't…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This establishes that whether or not Socrates originally believes his punishment is right, by staying in Athens his entire life, he made a commitment to follow the law-being just-therefore, if he is accused of breaking the law and is convicted by the courts of Athens, which represent the law, then he must complete his sentence, or else he is only becoming more unjust. Socrates later decides that although he could escape, it is better to try and do the right thing, despite having done unjust things in the past, and ultimately decides to carry out his punishment. This passage also further examines the gray area within the idea of just and unjust by saying that following the laws is just; however, the people of the court who determine which acts are within the bounds the laws and which acts are not, are also biased according to their own personal perceptions, meaning no human truly knows the intransigent definitions of what is just and what is unjust.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sutta Nipata 705 quote refers to the equality of all people as it states “Just as I am so are they, just as they are so am I,” This equality therefore assess the harming of other people and self-harming as it states “he should neither kill”. Buddhists must treat other people the same as how they would treat themselves. Therefore, they must not harm others or themselves. Buddhist ethical teachings have a strong and positive impact on the expression of Buddhism as a living religious tradition. This is because it provides solutions to different types of ethical…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Human Condition

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some people do think what their actions will do to others or those who have hurt…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Socrates

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The social contract allows human beings to leave the state of nature, based on fear and violence, but this will only be possible if there is a power to enforce it. For that reason, as part of that contract, are transferred unconditionally to a person or body collective, the sovereign authority, the powers that will enable it to exercise power to ensure peace and justice that are the objective of this contract social and defend the weakest from the domination of the strongest. From this mode justifies the birth of government the great Leviathan. On the contrary, Socrates provides different values such as virtue and introspective analysis as the main philosophical guide to run a government.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The law of evolution is that the strongest survives! ' 'Yes, and the strongest, in the existence of any social species, are those who are most social. In human terms, most ethical...There is no strength to be gained from hurting one another. Only weakness” (Quotes About Ethics, 2012).…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays