Preview

Sociology- Criminology Essay Jan 2011

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1608 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sociology- Criminology Essay Jan 2011
Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of subcultural theories in explaining ‘subcultural crime and deviance’ in society today. (21 marks) – Jan 2011
Subcultural crime and deviance refers to criminal acts, rule breaking and behaviour that is being committed by groups in society that does not conform to the norms and expectations of a particular society or social group. Subcultural theories attempt to explain why certain groups within society commit crime and deviance within society and has achieved in constructing useful theories, however each have their own weaknesses.
Early Functionalist ideas, as seen in Item A, are interested in explaining why some people in society break the rules and overall see crime as a group activity. The following approaches see the deviant as simply reacting to external forces largely beyond their control and see crime and deviance as social facts that can be measured in society.
One of these approaches is Merton’s Strain theory whose key idea is that deviance is the product of a delinquent subculture with different norms and values from the rest of society that provides an alternative opportunity structure for those denied a legitimate chance to succeed. According to Merton, deviance within society is a result of the culture and structure of society itself because he believes all members of society share common values and goals but do not always occupy the same economic and social positions. Therefore, they do not have equal opportunities to realise those goals. One example Merton uses is the ‘American Dream’ to illustrate his theory. The philosophy behind this believes anyone can achieve their goals of the American Dream regardless of their social background through normal means including hard work, determination etc. However, Merton argues that the pressure from society to achieve financial success actively pushes individuals to commit crimes because they want to achieve

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using the material from item A and elsewhere asses the usefulness of subcultural theories in explaining subcultural crime and deviance in society.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalist such as Merton explain crime through “strain theory” stating that individuals commit deviant behaviour when they are unable to achieve socially approved goals through legitimate means, arguing that an individuals position in society affects how they respond to the strain to anomie. There are 5 types of adaption such as; Conformity is where individuals accept culturally approved goals & achieves them legitimately, this is usually found within the middle class. Innovation refers to Individuals who accept the goals of money & success however uses illegitimate means to achieve this success through activities such as Fraud & theft. Ritualism is usually associated to individuals who give up on trying to achieve goals however still how still follow rules for their own sake; on the other hand Retreatism describes individuals who reject both goals & legitimate means leading them to becoming dropouts which can result to individuals resulting becoming drug addicts. The final type is Rebellion individuals reject society’s goals & replace them with new ones in desire to bring about revolutionary change. This theory is useful as it explains how crime arises from mainstream goals as both conformist & innovators are pursing the same goal but one is legitimate & the other is illegitimate, however it all seems to take notice of utilitarian crime &…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some sociologists believe that the initial cause of crime and deviance is attaching a definition or meaning to an individual or group of individuals, due to their ethnicity, social background, or gender. Many sociologists argue that no act is criminal in itself, however it only becomes criminal when others label it so. The labelling theory tends to look more at societies reaction to the act rather than the nature of the act. Lemert says that it is ‘pointless to seek the causes of primary deviance’- this suggesting that deviance is unlikely to have a single cause.…

    • 810 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime occurs when society does not provide its members with equal opportunities in society. The individuals are not given equal opportunity in society will not have the same investment in their community as members of society that are afforded job and educational opportunities. When social functions are not equal the members of society are not recognized by society, he or she will develop their own unique subculture is more accepting of crime (Rock, 2012). This type of subculture appears in lower income and poverty…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, deviance may occur as an act of rebellion and defiance against a social order that is perceived to be unjust. In combination with poor normative-social development, economic factors will conduce to crime more readily than either one or the other set of factors alone. Blended with personality and other hereditary factors, a given individual exposed to the same or similar environmental circumstances will exhibit a greater or less significant tendency to commit property crimes. While every crime theory has contributed to the crime issue study, each theory has looked at the issue in a different…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merton suggests that people are socialised into wanting particular things, such as nice houses or cars, etc. However, the majority of people lack the means to achieve these goals. According to Merton, it is this that causes a strain in the structure of society - there is a conflict between what people have been socialised to expect and what they can realistically achieve through legal means. Merton argues that this is what leads people to crime and deviance, when trying to find an alternative route to gaining what they want, not through cultural transmission.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This theory meshes some aspects from both the social disorganization theory and the strain theory. The main premise of the cultural deviance theory is that conformity to the prevailing cultural norms of lower class society causes crime. The lower class subculture has its own set of values, rules, and beliefs that clash with the mainstream values of the middle-class and wealthy. Criminality is a manifestation of conformity to lower class subculture values. Members of the working and lower class commit crimes of different variations as they respond to the cultural norms of their own class in an effort to deal with adjustments of the socioeconomic classes.…

    • 2400 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, Merton’s strain theory can be criticised because it focuses on individual responses to limited access to opportunity structures or access to illegitimate opportunity structures and doesn’t recognise that there is a social pattern of crime and deviance affecting whole groups of people, linked to social class, age, gender, ethnicity and locality, and not all of these people are subjected to the same opportunity structures.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Merton’s (1998) ‘Strain theory and anomie’ argues that deviance arises from the structure of society and that unequal access to legitimate opportunity structures is the cause of deviant behaviour. The main point that Merton’s theory outlines is the fact that people engage in deviant behaviour because they are unable to achieve socially approved goals by legitimate means, and when most people share similar goals for example financial success in an unequal society not all individuals have the opportunity to achieve those goals through approved means, therefore they feel different, as the dominant rules on how to achieve success don’t meet their needs, and as a result deviance occurs. People may become frustrated and resort to criminal means of getting what they want, or lash out in anger, or find comfort for their failures in drug use. Merton’s explanation of crime and deviance combines two elements: Structural factors – society’s unequal opportunity structure and cultural factors – the strong emphasis on success goals and the weaker emphasis of using legitimate means to get them. For Merton, deviance is the result of a strain between two things: the goals that a culture encourages individuals to achieve and what the institutional structure of society allows them to achieve. Merton argues that there are different ‘modes of adaptation’, or responses to situations and access to opportunities that range from conformity – individuals accept the culturally approved goals and strive to achieve them individually, to one of four forms that could be seen as deviance;…

    • 1579 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Merton another functionalist argued that many types of crime exist because society as a whole shares the same ‘American dream’ (i.e. to become rich and successful), but not everyone can achieve these things lawfully, so a strain exists between the goals and ambitions of people and their ability to achieve them. The problem with Merton’s strain theory is that there are many people in society who have not achieved the so called ‘American dream’ but haven’t turned to crime, so it can be argued that crime is committed collectively and maybe because of a lack of socialisation and upbringing.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other perspectives tend to focus on a smaller demographic or that it relies on specific scenarios to push people towards criminal behavior. Merton’s theory fails to address the class dilemmas as people from lower class households may not be able to achieve their cultural goals though institutionalized means. Cohen’s theory is not strong enough on its own to explain the numerous homicides in inner-city areas as he claims about lower class delinquency is only relevant to young males who join gangs. Cloward and Ohlin’s theory is pertains only to cases of people becoming criminals in response to numerous of illegitimate opportunities. Messner and Rosenfeld’s theory is only relevant to crime in regards to people following the American dream and other similar goals. Agnew’s theory can cover different races, genders, and ethnic groups which it also explains why crimes like homicide is concentrated in specific areas as the source of the problem is due to people being unable to adapt to those…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology Chapter 9

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Critical Review: The most serious crimes are committed by those whose 
psychological profiles are normal 
Social Foundations of Deviance…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Merton’s strain theory can be criticised because it focuses on individual responses to limited access to opportunity structures or access to illegitimate opportunity structures and doesn’t recognise that there is a social pattern of crime and deviance affecting whole groups of people, linked to social class, age, gender, ethnicity and locality, and not all of these people are subjected to the same opportunity structures.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the usefulness of subcultural theories in explaining ‘subcultural crime and deviance’ in society today.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays