Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Social Structure in Early Complex Societies Primary Sources

Good Essays
663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Structure in Early Complex Societies Primary Sources
In early civilizations, there was already a distinct hierarchy of social classes. However, although there were similarities between the hierarchies of these civilizations, the manner in which they manifested themselves and the factors which led to an individual being in a particular class differed throughout the regions and time periods.

As shown in document one, social classes were very dependent on occupation at times. In document one, an Egyptian father is shown instructing his son be academically successful, during the First Intermediate Period when invasions were common and the country was divided, for the sole reason that if he fails to do so, he will spend his days performing difficult manual labor instead of commanding those who do so. Additional documents that could support this analysis may include the diaries of a peasant worker and a priest.

Document two illustrates that a king, in this case - Hammurabi (who created the Code of Hammurabi, the official law of Babylon), at the top of the hierarchy, has all power and is capable of creating and recording all laws for his citizens. This excerpt also shows that slaves were considered far less important than the common person. This is shown in Law 199 which discusses the punishment for hurting a man's slave, which is far less severe than the punishment for hurting a man; the slave is at the lowest end of the hierarchy. Additional documents that could support this analysis might include the diaries of Hammurabi's people.

The previous analysis is also supported in document three in which a priest tells his people a story about how their world was created, during a time period when the Aryans had recently arrived in India. Within the story, it is shown that the world was created from the body Purusha. When the body was divided, Purusha's mouth, the most important part of the body,

becomes the priest, who happens to be at the highest end of the hierarchy. The arms become the warrior (or strength--possibly the class just below the priest), the thighs become the merchants, farmers, and artisans, again one step lower in class, and lastly the feet of Purusha become landless peasants and servants. In India, Purusha is a physical representation of social class. Additional documents that may help with this analysis might include the diary of a landless peasant who can only listen to the priests.

Document four is an excerpt from the Book of Songs illustrating a peasant's protest towards the current ruler: how he or she is unable to prevent rodents from eating his or her millet. At this time period in China, this would have been a sign that the current ruler had lost the Mandate of Heaven, which was the concept that the correct ruler was chosen by a supreme deity and would remain in power if they ruled with wisdom, principle, and served as an energetic guardian towards his/her people. The fact that the peasants had even the slightest say in the choice of ruling was unique when compared to the other ancient civilizations. Some additional documents that could support this analysis might include the journal log of the ruler who was in power.

Finally, document five is about an Egyptian man standing over a woman, during the end of the ruling of Tutmoses III (possibly during the time period of the Exodus according to the Bible), perhaps suggesting that men were of a higher class than women in the Egyptian culture. The man is also shown to be physically bigger than women, possibly alluding to the fact that men were of greater importance. Some historical documents that may support this conclusion might have included the translation of the hieroglyphs surrounding this scene.

As has been shown previously in the analyses of these five documents, while all of these societies contained social classes and/or hierarchies, the factors which controlled the level of which social class you fell in and your power differed from society to society.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Hammurabi took Babylon from a small town near the Tigris river to being “one of the most powerful and influential in all of Mesopotamia” (Mark). The name Babylon means “confusion” in Hebrew, and it is where the tower of Babel was located. He did many things to the city in order to keep it peaceful. He was so good at war he had all the surrounding cities united under Babylon which made it the largest city in Mesopotamia. He also created a code of laws called Hammurabi’s code. The code had so much as 200 plus laws in it that were very specific. An example of a law in Hammurabi’s code was “If anyone is committing a robbery and is caught, then he shall be put to death” (“Hammurabi’s Code”). There were a lot of harsh laws but that was only to maintain peace between the different social…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Do you know who was the king of Babylon and what he did? About 4,000 years ago, Hammurabi, a king in Babylon, created a code of 282 laws to protect the weak. I think that his laws were fair.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Which of the following pairs correctly identifies the subjects illustrated on the Royal Standard of Ur?…

    • 494 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the civilizations that we studied thus far have some type of social class and inequality between the citizens. In both the Chinese and Roman societies, they both maintained social classes. In the Han and Qin dynasties, the social classes were divided by philosophy. For example, Confucianism. Confucianism is the idea that people should have respect for one another and it is better to be a gentleman than just a normal person. If you were a scholar-gentry were considered to be upper classman. You would be the people governing society. Changes in social class were completely out of the question. In the Roman Empire, they didn’t stress hierarchy. You were either upper or a lower class citizen. You could change your rank in social…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zhou: had alliance system with regional princes and nobles (feudalism) - eventually princes disregarded the central government. Extended territory of China to Middle Kingdom (between Huang He and Yangtze). Mandate of Heaven- justification for Chinese Imperial rule. Banned human sacrifice and standard language was Mandarin.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meso-America and South America, when compared to Egypt, have tons of differences and similarities of which both play a very important role in the making of these cultures and societies. These differences and similarities create a form of community that makes everything about the Meso-American, South American, and Egyptian cultures very special.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Babylonian empire brought the first code of laws that applied to all citizens. It also gave rights to women and slaves. Individuals felt a sense of fairness and hope under this rule. They pursued interests that went beyond survival and took pride in their achievements. Their craftwork flourished and made Babylonia an important center of trade. The Babylonian empire’s…

    • 346 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China vs Egypt Whap

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In ancient China and Egypt, two civilizations came to be. Egypt grew to be a vast empire while the Zhou dynasty was one of the longest lasting Chinese dynasties. They both had many similarities and differences in their social and political structure. The political structure in Egypt was based on a theocracy with a centralized control of administration, while the Zhou had a decentralized administration and left much power in local hands. They both had in common the fact that the leaders of these civilizations were blood related and had a close relationship with the gods. On the social structural end of the civilizations Egypt and the Zhou both had hierarchy’s and class differentiations. Where these two civilizations contrast is the fact that the Zhou was based on a patriarchal society and gave little rights to women while Egypt had slaves and gave their women more rights than the Zhou.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One law that shows how the society was in Babylonian at that time is law 202, that says if you hurt somebody in a higher rank, you will receive sixty blows with an ox-whip in public. This gives us the information that there existed different ranks in the Babylonian society. The people in a higher rank were worth more and seemed more important than the people in the ranks beneath them. This could also have to do with money, because people in higher ranks were probably rich and had more power because of their money. The people who had slaves were often rich, and this because they could afford it and they needed the help.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Part of the second class are the professional educated, soldiers, and skilled workers. The passage Ancient Egypt Egyptian social Structure states, “Lower…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many social classes of the Egyptian class structure. There are many social classes listed from the top, to the middle, and to the bottom.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On top of the "Social Pyramid," which is about all the classes rated high to low, is the Pharoh. Which was the ruler of Egypt. (Pharaoh already did in government.) Nobles and priests were under the Pharaohs. Nobles were to make sure taxes were collected and to watch and supervise the king's tomb in Vally of the Kings. Priests performed ceremonies at all temples through Egypt. Priests usually pass down their job to their son. Soldiers were under the Nobles and Priests. They were in the Egyptian army. It was well organized. It included infantry and chariot troops. When they're in peace time, soldiers work on government projects. Under the soldiers were scribes. People who were scribes are lucky. There were the only people who knew how to write.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elias describes the advancement of new functions and behavior patterns in the civilizing process of different groups. One of the consequences of these changes is the blurring of class differences. For example labor was usually considered the duty of the lower…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ancient Egyptian people were grouped in a hierarchical system with the Pharaoh at the top and farmers and slaves at the bottom. The groups of people nearest the top of society were the richest and most powerful.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In early societies, people shared a common social standing. As societies evolved and became more complex, they began to elevate some members. Today, stratification, a system by which society ranks its members in a hierarchy, is the norm throughout the world. All societies stratify their members. A stratified society is one in which there is an unequal distribution of society’s rewards and in which people are arranged hierarchically into layers according to how much of society’s rewards they possess. To understand stratification, we must first understand its origins.…

    • 5553 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays