Preview

Social Stratification

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1173 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Stratification
Q1A. The question of the inevitability of social stratification is one of the fundamental bases of the theories of Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore. Davis and Moore (1945) argue that as long as there is division of labor in the society, and that there are variability in the roles with varying degrees of importance, stratification will occur. There is a significant difference in the wages of CEO’s and a minimum wage earner because according to the theory, there is a functional necessity of providing different rewards for different positions in the society in accordance to an individual’s abilities. Because not everyone is qualified for specific positions or roles set by the society, there is a need to fill them by making sure that the right people are motivated enough to find ways by which they can fill these certain positions.
The theory established by Davis and Moore shows that social stratification, aside from being inevitable, is highly functional in nature. Stratification is an instrument that the society utilizes to attract the right people for the right roles set by the society. The situation regarding the increasing wage gap between the CEO and the minimum wage earners can be explained by the functional needs to get the right people motivated to do to right job through stratification.

Q1B. There is empirical evidence showing that women earn significantly less than men. Davis and Moore would probably look at this situation emphasizing that gender is a central aspect in the social stratification. It is functional in a sense that men are physically more competent than women, and therefore giving them more incentives to perform these positions would result to the improvement of productivity. Society has set different roles for different genders and usually, the roles that are assigned to women are those that would allow them in work inside the house taking care of children for instance. Though this may also be considered as a full time job, there is no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today in society as many people know there are many ways to categorize people into different “social classes.” There has been many people who have tried and had labels for people in each “social class.” However, Karl Marx and Max Weber are well known in sociology classes for having certain criteria to classify people into their classes. We see that Both Marx and Weber has offered theoretical descriptions of how people are stratified into “social classes.”…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nickel and Dimed

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two very different ideas are presented in the hierarchy of humanity, known as the theories of stratification. The first is the functionalist theory of stratification. This theory holds that, according to Emile Durkheim, "inequalities are good for society..." Certain people are designed and trained to perform certain jobs, and only those people can perform them to their full capacity. The workplace must reward the employee for good jobs and advances in specialization and training. This will induce the employee to work at his or her full potential. The second idea, which juxtaposes the first, is the conflict theory of stratification. This theory poses the idea that any form of social stratification creates a small, powerful group of individuals, and a large group of low wage, working class citizens. This theory also makes the points that, those who are in power, try to keep it, and proceed to create further disadvantages for the working class. The conflict theory in effect states that social inequalities are not good for society as they limit the ability for talented workers to realize their potential and utilize in the workforce.…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout history competition has created bitter tension between social classes. Competition has occurred in every social structure that has existed to this day. Social structure has been the determining factor of competition: in essence the poorer classes have always tried to compete with the wealthier classes to seize their wealth and power; the greater the economical gap between the two opposing classes the fiercer the competition between them. Two highly esteemed and different people, Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie, developed their own ideologies to resolve and ease class tension, that is, whether changes should be imposed on the structure and role of social classes. Another writer, Sam Keen illustrates the effect of competition in the extreme. Within their opposing and controversial views, there lies the more efficient social-economic resolution: a modified version of Carnegie's argument, despite the fact that it has some imperfections. The answer is determined by the acknowledgment by the powerful and the wealthy of certain responsibilities to the poorer classes. Each author feels that the competition within a capitalist society has definite effects on social structure but disagree as to what this effect is.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are a number of different sociological perspectives that attempt to explain class stratification. One theory of which is Marxism. Karl Marx believed that there was a definite conflict between the classes, and that the system of stratification derives from different social groups and their relations to the means of production. From Marx's perspective, a class group is when all it's members share the same relations to the means of production. Marxism also believes that there are only 2 classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, showing social closure. The bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat who have to sell their labour to the ruling class. Marx believed that the…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Occupational gender segregation contributes to stratification in society. Job segregation is structural; it does not occur simply because individual workers have different abilities, motivations, and material needs. According to Kendall, Linden, Murray, (2001) as a result of gender and racial segregation, employers are able to pay many visible minority males and female less money, promote them less and provide fewer benefits. If they demand better working conditions or wages, workers often are reminded of the number of individuals who would like to have their…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social stratification refers to a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. Hypothetically, we can analyze social stratification from three major perspectives. Structural functionalists argue that social stratification is beneficial for a society, while a conflict theorist would argue that, rather than benefiting society as a whole, stratification provides some people with advantages over others. Finally, a symbolic interactionist would analyze how social stratification helps us see patterns of social inequality in our everyday…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘Stratification as Functional’ - Pages 266-267 - Sociology: A Global Introduction John J Macionis & Ken Plummer - Pearson Education Ltd. 2012…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Davis and Moore also look at the stratifications system and argue that it occurs in every known society and that in order for the stratification system to work we must have effective role allocation. Role allocation ensures that the roles in society are filled by those who are best suited to them and will do the best job possible. This benefits society because it means we will have good lawyers to fight our cases in courts, good doctors to treat us when we are sick, good politicians to run the country and so on. All societies need a mechanism for this to happen and ours is social stratification.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social inequality is prominent within our American society today. It affects and usually deteriorates the potential success of different classes of people living in America. With major issues like this present within in our society, there are many people who think that they have solutions. These groups of people can be classified into certain categories that Americans would label as Conservatives, Liberalists and Radicals. Each group has specific ideals and beliefs that they hold on to. They apply their values and beliefs into proposing probable solutions to society’s issues. When is comes to social inequality, each of these groups have many probable solutions to racial, gender and wealth inequality. Racial inequality has to deal with the affected success of different races due to societies influence, policies, and rules. Gender…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As one of the major systems of stratification, class is based on ownership of resources and on the type of work that people do. Marx and Webber acknowledged social class as a determinant of social inequality and social change. For Marx, people’s wealth determines their class position. The stratification of society into different social groups results in disparity in income and wealth and uneven access to available goods and services. People with high income or wealth have more opportunity to control their own lives. People with less income have fewer life chances and must spend their restricted resources to obtain basic living requirements.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In view of this thought, individuals with a higher social class positioning have great advantages over those in lower class rankings. Class stratification…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Inequality happens when an individual or a group within a society has unequal rights to social commodities such as power, wealth, education and opportunity. The book defines Inequality as "the degree to which culturally valued material and social rewards are given disproportionately to individuals, families and other kinds of groups". Each culture has a different expression of inequality. Morton Fried, a Professor of Anthropology in the 1960's, proposed that there exists three kinds main kinds of inequalities across most cultures: Egalitarian, Ranked and Stratified.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social stratification implies the divisions of people into different societal classes leading to either an advantaged or disadvantaged group. Numerous factors contribute to social stratification. According to Feder (2014), social stratification refers to a pattern of social integration in which people are placed in a hierarchy of various social levels. This hierarchy places individuals in different statuses of wealth within a civilization.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some Principles of Stratification, American Sociological Review Vol. 10, No. 2, 1944 Annual Meeting Papers (Apr., 1945)…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Joan Ferranti (1982), there are four fundamental principles of stratification: firstly, Social stratification is a characteristic of society and not just due to individual differences. Secondly, Social stratification persists over generations yet most societies…

    • 2691 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics