Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Social Psychology

Better Essays
1268 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Psychology
Social Psychology “Social Psychology’s great lesson is the enormous power of social influence. This influence can be seen in our conformity, our compliance, and our group behavior (Myers 680)”. Social influence relates to conformity and obedience, group influence, and ultimately, the power of individuals. “Social Psychologists explore these connections by scientifically studying how we think about, influence, and relate to one another (Myers 673)”. There are two kinds of social influence: Normative and Informational. These two influences are the reason why people adjust their behavior to coincide with a group standard. Solomon Asch devised a simple test in order to study conformity. He put six people in a room with one thinking they were being studied on their visual perception. Each person took their turn answering the experimenter’s question: Which of the three comparison lines is identical to the standard line? After everyone answered, another set of lines was shown. The pattern continued until the first five people purposely give the wrong answer. The findings showed that more than one-third of the time, the sixth person conformed by going along with the group’s wrong answer. They were “willing to call white black”. Sometimes people succumb to their situations. When we become aware that our attitudes and actions don’t match, we experience cognitive dissonance. In order to assess people’s attitudes before and after they adopt a new role, Philip Zimbardo designed an experiment. He took college students, randomly designated them as guards or prisoners, and

put them in a simulated prison. The prisoners were locked up in barren cells and forced to wear humiliating uniforms. The guards were given uniforms, billy clubs, and whistles and instructed to enforce certain rules. The findings showed that a toxic situation can trigger degrading behaviors due to the fact that, “After a day or two in which the volunteers self-consciously “played” their roles, the simulation became real—too real. Most of the guards developed disparaging attitudes, and some devised cruel and degrading routines. One-by-one the prisoners broke down, rebelled, or became passively resigned, causing Zimbardo to call off the study after only six days (Myers 677)”. The fundamental attribution error, foot-in-the-door phenomenon, prejudice, and deindividuation are also social influence topics that are going to be explained and discussed in an analysis of 12 Angry Men:
The fundamental attribution error occurs when people overestimate the influence of personality in certain situations while underestimating the influence of the situation at hand. In 12 Angry Men, the juror’s interpretation of the boy on trial’s aggression reflects this fundamental attribution theory. For example, the fact that the boy bought a knife leads juror number two to assume he must be a violent kid, or how juror number three saw the boy’s fight with his father to be indicative of the boy’s constant defiance. The fact is, the boy on trial could very well have bought the knife as a self-defense tactic and had no history of violence.

Furthermore, the fight that the boy was heard having with his father could have been a rare occurrence in the household. Normative social influence occurs when one thinks that the price paid for being different may be severe. It is when people try to avoid rejection and gain approval. Juror number eight never let his self become a victim of this type of social influence because of the obvious fact that he went against the crowd the whole time and never wavered. After casting the first vote, realizing the vote is eleven to one, juror number one announces, “There’s always one.” Everyone then had to argue why they voted the way they did. Juror number two answered by saying he just thinks the boy is guilty and it’s obvious. Others argue that there’s no way to depute the facts: He is a wild, angry kid, the neighbor lady saw him do it, his own lawyer even knew he was guilty, he couldn’t remember what show he saw at the theatre, he’s had a miserable eighteen years of life, he was doomed once he was born, the slums breed criminals, under-privileged kids murder, etc. These arguments are examples of informational social influence because they are opinions of reality which each juror can choose to accept or decline. All of these things influence the twelve juror’s emotions and logic. For example, Juror number three’s emotions are influenced because his son left home at sixteen after they got into a fight, so he can relate to the case. The foot-in-the-door phenomenon begins when juror number eight votes not guilty and tries to prove beyond reasonable doubt. He starts by questioning if the switch-blade knife could

really be one-of-kind because he owns one as well now. Then he questions if the eye witness could have really seen the killing through the passing train, as well as, if the man who heard the boy and father fighting could actually hear them over the noise of the train. The rest of the juror’s think he is crazy, but they eventually, one-by-one start to be influenced by Henry Fonda’s statements and start to prove reasonable doubt themselves. Once they start down the path of questioning the facts and focusing on the process rather than the outcome, there was no turning back, and they ultimately proved the boy was not guilty. All of the jurors except one were prejudice against the boy on trial. The reason why juror number eight was not prejudice in any way is because he questioned if the boy’s actions were directly due to his situation, didn’t use the boy as an outlet for his anger, and never blamed the boy. The other eleven jurors didn’t give the boy a chance by putting their own beliefs, emotions, and predisposition to act in front of logic. They stereotyped the boy as well, saying that the slums are breeding grounds for criminals and trash. Juror number ten is a perfect example of overt prejudice because he reveals that he thinks “these people” are born violent and liars. The more subtle prejudice is shown when the old man (juror number nine) is shown “special treatment” simply because of his age and the preconceived notions about old people. Deindividuation can occur only in groups when the presence of others arose and diminish people’s sense of responsibility. Group participation can make people feel anonymous

which can be dangerous. On June 15th, 2011, a riot broke out in Vancouver after the Boston Bruins’ win over Vancouver in the seventh game of the Stanley Cup Finals. “At least 140 people were reported as injured during the incident, one critically; at least four people were stabbed, nine police officers were injured, and 101 people were arrested that night, with 16 further arrests following the event (Wikipedia)”. This is an extreme example of deindividuation and what kind of damage it can cause. When people are put into a group setting together, as shown in 12 Angry Men, all aspects of social psychology are presented, and there is absolutely no way around the presence of social influences. It is, however, in our own control whether or not we succumb to our situations or follow the crowd when we know the actions are wrong. Every situation and person is different but if we stand by what we believe it can only be of benefit to our society.

References
Myers, David G. Psychology: Ninth Edition. Ed. Kevin Feyen. New York, NY: Worth Publishers, 2010. Print
"2011 Vancouver Stanley Cup Riot." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 19 Sept. 2011.

References: Myers, David G. Psychology: Ninth Edition. Ed. Kevin Feyen. New York, NY: Worth Publishers, 2010. Print "2011 Vancouver Stanley Cup Riot." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 19 Sept. 2011.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo, was performed to see the process that takes place where guards and prisoners "learn" to become authoritarian guards and compliant prisoners. (Zimbardo, 732).…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram and Zimbrado

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Difference #1. A major difference between Zimbardo’s and Milgram’s studies is that, in the prison study, only one experimental manipulation was performed — being assigned to the role of prisoner or guard. This is a major limitation because we cannot know, as we did in the Milgram study, which factors in the situation were most important for the behaviors observed. There is no doubt that each participant’s self-definition as prisoner or guard was important, but it might have helped us to develop a deeper understanding of how such a self-definition can be maintained if Zimbardo and his colleagues had varied other factors in the situation. For example, would wearing normal clothes, which might have caused increased feelings of individuality, have resulted in decreased role-playing? Would a decrease in the reality of the simulation (perhaps by removing the bars on the doors, or having campus security “arrest” the prisoners) have done the same? It would have been very interesting, for example, if we had found that none of these factors were important — that, instead, it was simply the assigning of an arbitrary social role by an authority figure and the…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo’s mock prison experiment yielded the conclusion that individual behavior is largely under the control of social forces and environmental contingencies rather than personality traits, character, and will power. His findings were shown through the change in the pretend prison guards’ behavior over a matter of days. Their total demeanor was transformed and they became the role they were playing, with tyrannical and abusive actions towards the prisoners. The prison guards’ power went to their heads and corrupted them, much like what happened in the case of ordinary soldiers torturing prisoners. Like the prison guards, the soldiers were ordinary until they were put into a role of power. The environment of the prison with no structure or set rules changed the soldiers’ demeanors and caused them to throw their morals aside for limitless power over other human…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (“On the Ethics of Intervention…” narration 1-3). More than seventy people signed up, but only a total of twenty four people were ‘clean’ from crimes or psychological problems (“On the Ethics of Intervention…” 1). “Virtually all had indicated a preference for being a prisoner because they could not imagine going to college and ending up as a prison guard. On the other hand, they could imagine being imprisoned for a driving violation or some act of civil disobedience” (“Reflection on the Stanford…” 5). Prisoners were arrested for either burglary or armed robbery (Lestik 1). The guards and convicts were destined to their roles by a flip of a coin to be fair (Lestik 1). College students who were selected to represent the role of prisoners were arrested by the Palo Alto police as if they actually committed action against the law (Lestik 1). Rights were read, fingerprints were stamped, and they were handcuffed into a police car (Lestik 1). The prisoners did not know what was going on even though they signed up for the experiment (Lestik 1). “We were studying both guard and prisoner behavior, so neither group was given any instruction on how to behave. The guards were merely told to maintain law and order, to use their billy clubs as only symbolic weapons and not actual ones, and to realize that if the prisoners escaped the study would be terminated”…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this experiment a simulated prison was created where college students were recruited for a two week study and paid $15 a day to either be a prison guard or an inmate. “After a day or two in which the volunteers self-consciously “played” their roles, the simulation became real-too real.” (Social Psychology) The guards took their roles too seriously and “devised cruel and degrading routines.” (Social Psychology) After only six days, the experiment got out of hand and was forced to be shut down. The experiment showed that situational factors powerfully affected human behaviors. This was shown by the many inmates that broke down and had emotional breakdowns and left the experiment because the prison guards took it too far when given a position of authority. The individuals in the experiment were deindividualized and no longer had any self-awareness of what they were doing within the group. Zimbardo’s Experiment clearly showed that “people will readily conform to the social roles they are expected to play, especially if the roles are so strongly stereotyped as those of the prison guards.” (McLeod, Zimabardo - Stanford Prison Experiment,…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Conformity

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, the benefits outweigh the costs of deceit for the purpose of this experiment. Also, Asch’s paradigm was an effective method of research to show the root effect of models and non-ambiguous conformity. The confederates also acted as a valuable variable which allowed the implications of certain responses on the the genuine participant’s conformity or lack of conformity. However, since there were confederates in the experiment, it cannot easily be generalized and the ecological validity is also decreased. The numbers of trials and repetition of the study increases the…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everybodys doing it

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain the difference between the two main motives for conformity: informational social influence and normative social influence.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zimbardo Research Paper

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The value of the study in relation to social psychology was the demonstration on how social roles can have a negative effect on a person’s behavior. It showed that putting an individual in a bad situation can potentially change their behavior or basic personal characteristic. I opened the path to further examining how situations individuals are placed in can drastically their behavior. The experiment showed that with random assignment, the social class of individuals before the experiment did not matter. It also showed that when told to do what is necessary to maintain order in the makeshift prison, the guards took actions that they probably would never have done in their life. It showed how easily people can change in order to maintain control and authority.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this experiment, Professor Zimbardo and his subordinates chose the twenty-four of the most psychologically stable and healthy candidates from over seventy-five undergraduates. The randomly assigned prisoners were then arrested at their homes and processed with the help of local police, getting their mug shots taken, fingerprinted, and issued prison uniforms before being confined to a cell in a Stanford University basement. Those who were assigned prison guard duty were issued guard uniforms and instructed in how to treat the “prisoners”. The “guards” were also issued the wooden police batons as authority symbols and visible threats of physical injury to prisoners, and also wore mirrored sunglasses to prevent prisoner eye contact and add to the depersonalization of the mock prison. The second day of the experiment, the “prisoners” rioted, prompting the prison “guards” to break up the riot by attacking the prisoners with fire extinguishers without the supervision of the research staff. After thirty-six hours, “Prisoner 8612” went into a hysterical rage, and was only released after his suffering was apparent to the researchers. His release started a false rumor of a “prison break”, and the guards dismantled the prison to build in a more “secure” location. People would believe the experiment would be ended at that point, especially since the subjects involved were Stanford undergraduates under the supervision of a respectable university professor. They do not understand that when human beings become too involved in their roles or their society, they become what they and everyone else are acting as, creating a new identity to fit in, rather than fight the system to make it…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Do People Conform?

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The causes of conformity among individuals have long been debated and researched in recent decades. It is for this reason that conformity is an intriguing psychological concept. It causes sound-minded individuals to go against their best judgement, to engage in behaviour which they usually would not engage in, even accept and welcome an idea they internally disagree with, all in order to not be a deviant from the group. It is thus interesting to look at the factors which cause people to conform, to do what they see others doing, to rely on the judgements of the group, and to ignore their own senses and perceptions. It is the reasons for the individual's desire to conform that I will be discussing in this paper.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanford Prison Study (SPE), Zimbardo carried out, an experiment. This experiment had 24 final participants. The guards’ task was to humiliate the prisoners and make the prisoners feel powerless. The result of this experiment was that the guards identified themselves as the in-group and the prisoners as the out-group.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our roles in social institutions and our various environments have a huge influence on our behaviours, attitudes and beliefs. When placed in an extreme environment, individuals usually begin to stress and feel unsafe. When assigned to authoritative roles, indivuals in toxic environments tend to act aggressive and arbitrarily in order to maintain control and avoid any form of harm directed at them. When placed in an extreme environment, one tends to assume that their values and morals can overcome the harsh situations in that environment. Unfortunately the sad reality is that these extreme environments usually take control over one’s behaviour and beliefs. This was proved in various experiments conducted such as Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience and Conformity and Zimbardo’s Experiment on the “Pathology of Prisoners”.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Lucifer Effect

    • 10294 Words
    • 42 Pages

    aroused, amplified, or manipulated by situational forces that we fail to recognize as potent. This is why evil is so pervasive. Its temptation is just a small turn away, a slight detour on the path of life, a blur in our sideview mirror, leading to disaster. In trying to understand the character transformations of the good young men in the Stanford Prison Experiment, I previously outlined a number of psychological processes that were pivotal in perverting their thoughts, feelings, perceptions, and actions. We saw how the basic need to belong, to associate with and be accepted by others, so central to community building and family bonding, was diverted in the SPE into conformity with newly emergent norms that enabled the guards to abuse the prisoners. We saw further that the basic motive for consistency between our private attitudes and public behavior allowed for dissonant commitments to be resolved and rationalized in violence against one's fellows.…

    • 10294 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics