Gladwell discusses the high risk activism going on during the Civil Right movement (Gladwell). Supporters went out and risked their lives for a cause they believed in through boycotts and sit-ins. Social media cannot provide the same high risk activism seen from back then. I agree that social media cannot provide the same high risk activism; my experience in activism through social media confirms it. During the summer of 2014, the “Ice-Bucket Challenge” was a massive phenomenon online. It was done to raise money for the ALS Association. So many trying to escape the summer heat dumped a bucket of ice water on their head and posted it on social media in support of the cause. Some did donate money to the foundation, but most people simply just did it to pour cold water on their friends head. There was no actual risk, but people felt as though they were making a difference. Social media makes people feel better about themselves thanks to the support a certain cause, but in reality users of social media are not real …show more content…
He contributes a compelling argument that social media is a limiting platform and real activism involves actual risk holds true today. Clicking a button does not make one an activist. Despite these claims, I think Gladwell is mistaken regarding the weak and strong ties social media can create. Social media is a way for people to connect and become closer. Social media has grown to be a controversial topic and it continues to be debated. Hopefully, we can find a way to make social media a more effective platform for change in the