Preview

Social Darwinism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1088 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Darwinism
Social Darwinism is the theory developed in England and the United States that includes the ideas of Natural Selection and Survival of the Fittest. It generally states that the strong will survive, gain power, be wealthy and prosper in society while the weak will die off, lose power, be poor and not prosper in society. The stronger you are the generally better your life will be in society. It is not something that you choose, but something that fate has chosen for you. You can be the hardest working person in the world and only achieve half of what someone else has, when it was just handed directly to them. That is how the world works, it is not a pretty place where everyone is happy and taken care of. The world is a battleground where you have to fight for what you want and what you want to achieve. The idea of everything being "fair" in society is a long lost dream. There is no way around it, people will be starving on the streets of Detroit while a movie producer in Los Angeles eats a three course meal and throws half of it in the garbage. There are a couple different views on Social Darwinism and in the paragraphs that follow I will try to help you understand them and then give you my own personal opinion on this idea that has so many people thinking deeply today. One of the obvious views is pro-Social Darwinism. These are the people who do fully believe in this idea and think it should be spread everywhere. Most of these people who believe that are not necessarily at the bottom of the food chain. Why would someone want to be put in a lower category and written off as weak and not given an opportunity to survive? The main supporters of this group would be the stronger, wealthier and more accomplished people in the world. It just wouldn't make sense for a bottom feeder to feel this way about Social Darwinism. One of the main arguments that this group gives is that they made their way to the top and even thought they were helped by "fate" or "luck" it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If the world came about by natural selection, then natural selection should continue to rule. If the world is survival of the fittest, one’s whole life should be devoted to building up their own castle, not their neighbor’s. Also to an evolutionist, moral obligations are useless and can be completely ignored, perhaps they don’t even exist. If everything is material, then why would anyone listen to a feeling that tells them to give up their belongings? It does not make any sense to donate to charities. Many Neo-Darwinists also do not believe in right versus wrong. This means that one should keep all of their earnings because it is not any better for them to give them up.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism fueled imperialism by making imperialistic nations believe that their imperialistic ventures were a natural turn of events and not a cruel, opressionistic system of government. These imperialistic nations exploited other nations and cultures and their troops' motivation was the glory of the nation and the eradication of the weaker races on earth. These soldiers believed in Social Darwinism. Also, nations were able to become imperialistic because of the support of their people. They "marketed" imperialism through Social Darwinism. Finally, when these weaker countries were taken over, they were brainwashed to believe that the invasion and oppression of their people were just a result of nature. These oppressed people believed this because, according to Social Darwinism, only the fittest survive. And so, the imperialistic nations would survive and multiply while the oppressed civilizations were invaded and changed.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a Social Darwinist, Carnegie applied Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory of “survival of the fittest” to the economy of the society.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems to me that we are all on the same page when it comes to the idea of pacifism and it’s importance. Even though my theories are based on how organisms fight for survival, seeing present-day problems it’s clear to me that pacifism is the key for solving those issues. One thing I did say in the past seems to have become true though, “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world.” (In text citation). This is not Social Darwinism nor was I a supporter of it, where human superiority over others is justified by race or class, but merely natural selection of civilized and barbaric people. This is relevant because…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The novel McTeague written by Frank Norris is considered a parallel to the concept of social darwinism. Social darwinism is “the social concept based on Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection which suggested that human social organization was based on the survival of the fittest and the idea that certain classes and races dominated because they are biologically superior.” The novel Mcteague has numerous characters that parallel the concept of social darwinism. In the novel Mcteague, Norris portrays social darwinism through the characters maria and zerkow by the way they steadily remain in their class respectfully throughout the novel and the characters Mcteague and Trina who attempt to act as though they were in another class and made rapid attempts to move up in the social classes.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism

    • 813 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1864, the theory of evolution became very well-known when Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species. Here he explained about his belief in what he called natural selection. Years later, after reading all about natural selection and becoming quite intrigued by it, a man by the name of Herbert Spencer, a polymath philosopher, came up with a synonym phrase for natural selection: “survival of the fittest.” This term, although referring to the capabilities of species to adapt to their environments, soon became a term used to describe real life. This became known as Social Darwinism.…

    • 813 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frank Norris, through the work of his novel McTeague, changed America in several ways. Norris was born in Chicago in 1870, during a naturalistic time period (The Literature Network). This novel was written with many themes that define naturalism, such as greed and lust. Social Darwinism, which can be defined as “survival of the fittest” also played a huge role in Norris’ making of this novel (schoolworkhelper). Using the themes of lust, sexual tragedy, and Social Darwinism, Frank Norris wrote one of the most controversial novels that our world has come about to this day in McTeague.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to Social Darwinism, there are a lot of pros and cons. First, we must understand that this idea was Herbert Spencer, but the person who was most recognized for this concept was, Charles Darwin. When it comes to, “survival of the fittest,” it was mainly talking about, you had to get in where you fit in. A lot of people did not agree with this theory, so this is where the cons comes in. Darwinism can be subjective.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "Origin of the Species," Charles Darwin argued that different environments encouraged the reproduction of those species whose varying traits best suited them to survive; their offspring, in turn, would be better adapted for the new environment, as would their offspring, and so on. Social Darwinism, developed by British philosopher Herbert Spencer, frequently misapplied this concept of "natural selection" to justify 19th-century social stratification between the rich and poor. The catch-phrase "survival of the fittest" (actually coined by Spencer, not Darwin; Spencer also popularized the term "evolution") does not mean the surviving members of an environment are the "best," but merely the best fit for their specific environment (for instance, Spencer's pale British skin would not survive long in sun-baked Africa). Therefore, evolution does not lead to the "perfectibility" of any species, as is generally perceived, but to the increasing adaptability and complexity of a species. Social Darwinism ignored this idea and contended that the social environment was much like the cutthroat natural environment, and that those who succeeded were biologically destined to do so and to continue in their march to human perfection. Conversely, those who failed were naturally inferior specimens of…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Call of the Wild

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jack London writing technique influence his readers to consider Social Darwinist has an outlook on life. Merriam Webster's explain Social Darwinist "to study of the human society, specifically a theory I human sociology that individuals or groups achieve advantages over others as the result of genetic or biological superiority. In class my classmates interpret it as "the survival of the fittest." I agree with them, but I feel that you have to learn and gain from…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the last third of the nineteenth century, steel became a more widely used material after…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Gilded Age (approximately 1870-1900) was a time when the gap between the very wealthy and the exceedingly poor was amplified. In addition to major concerns over political corruption and the expansion of cities, the labor movement, and the changing role of women—there was always the pervasive belief in the inferiority of races and civilizations—that people and nations were not equal. In our understanding of Social Darwinism, Charles Darwin’s (On The Origin of Species) natural selection theory of biological evolution, derived from the plant and animal kingdoms, was applied to society as a whole by Herbert Spencer (Sociology). In nature, plants, animals, and organisms adapt, change or die. When applied to individuals and business, there are “losers” because those best equipped to be successful in the competition emerges as the “winner.” By the late 1800s Social Darwinism had become an important philosophy within the large discussions of industrialization, business competition, economic development, reform, mass immigration, class (especially great wealth), and social progress. In a very broad sense, the theory of Social Darwinism suggested that the members of society were in a constant and aggressive struggle for existence. The Gilded Age virtues of hard work, self-denial, and rags-to-riches (i.e. the “myth of the self-made man” in the Horatio Alger novels) fueled ideas supporting the expression “survival of the fittest.” In terms of the public impact, Social Darwinism proposed that social progress comes as a result of this human contest. The theory also posited the ultimate demise of the “unfit” members of society who have “lost” the competition; or, in the worst case scenario, that “unfit” members would cause a strain on society—initiating the demise of the whole social…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    apush studyguide

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Social Darwinism-philosophy that used Darwin’s survival of the fittest to justify war and conquering of stronger nations against weaker nations…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud paper

    • 383 Words
    • 1 Page

    similar of that of Darwin's theory of Social Darwinism; survival of the fittest. In a…

    • 383 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Darwinism relates that human being respond instinctively to urges and drives in his domain his primary motive been one of survival. His view of the world in a natural sense is that only the fittest will survive.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays