Social Accountability
Paper No. 76 December 2004
31042
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
An Introduction to the Concept and Emerging
Practice
Carmen Malena, with
Reiner Forster
Janmejay Singh
Abstract
This paper highlights the World Bank’s growing interest and involvement in social accountability initiatives, which derive from its core goals of promoting poverty reduction and effective and sustainable development. It addresses five fundamental questions: (i) what is social accountability; (ii) why is it important; (iii) what are its core features; (iv) what are the key applications; and (v) what are the factors that underpin its success. The paper also explores the linkages between the concept and other key issues such as governance, gender, participation, empowerment and rights.
Social accountability is defined as an approach toward building accountability that relies on civic engagement, i.e., in which it is ordinary citizens and/or civil society organizations that participate directly or indirectly in exacting accountability. In a public sector context, social accountability refers to a broad range of actions and mechanisms that citizens, communities, independent media and civil society organizations can use to hold public officials and public servants accountable. These include, among others, participatory budgeting, public expenditure tracking, monitoring of public service delivery, investigative journalism, public commissions and citizen advisory boards. These citizen-driven accountability measures complement and reinforce conventional mechanisms of accountability such as political checks and balances, accounting and auditing systems, administrative rules and legal procedures.
Evidence suggests that social accountability mechanisms can contribute to improved governance, increased development effectiveness through better service delivery, and empowerment. While the range of social accountability mechanisms is wide and diverse, key common building blocks
31042
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
An Introduction to the Concept and Emerging
Practice
Carmen Malena, with
Reiner Forster
Janmejay Singh
Abstract
This paper highlights the World Bank’s growing interest and involvement in social accountability initiatives, which derive from its core goals of promoting poverty reduction and effective and sustainable development. It addresses five fundamental questions: (i) what is social accountability; (ii) why is it important; (iii) what are its core features; (iv) what are the key applications; and (v) what are the factors that underpin its success. The paper also explores the linkages between the concept and other key issues such as governance, gender, participation, empowerment and rights.
Social accountability is defined as an approach toward building accountability that relies on civic engagement, i.e., in which it is ordinary citizens and/or civil society organizations that participate directly or indirectly in exacting accountability. In a public sector context, social accountability refers to a broad range of actions and mechanisms that citizens, communities, independent media and civil society organizations can use to hold public officials and public servants accountable. These include, among others, participatory budgeting, public expenditure tracking, monitoring of public service delivery, investigative journalism, public commissions and citizen advisory boards. These citizen-driven accountability measures complement and reinforce conventional mechanisms of accountability such as political checks and balances, accounting and auditing systems, administrative rules and legal procedures.
Evidence suggests that social accountability mechanisms can contribute to improved governance, increased development effectiveness through better service delivery, and empowerment. While the range of social accountability mechanisms is wide and diverse, key common building blocks
Bibliography: Ackerman, John (2004). Social Accountability for the Public Sector: A Conceptual Discussion . Draft paper prepared for the World Bank. Behn, Robert (2001). Rethinking Democratic Ac countability . Washington: Brookings Institute. Commonwealth Foundation and CIVICUS (1999) Citizens and Governance. London: Commonwealth Foundation. Felicio, M., and I. John-Abraham (2004). Peru: Towards a System of Social Accountability, En Breve, No.39, Civil Society Team, Latin America and Caribbean Region. Fox, Jonathon (2000). “Civil Society and Political Accountability: Propositions for Discussion,” presented at the conference Institutions, Accountability and Democratic Governance in Latin America, The Helen Kellog Institute for International Studies, Notre Dame University, May 8, 2000. Gaventa, John (2002). “Introduction: Exploring Citizenship, Participation and Accountability”, IDS Bulletin , Vol Goetz, Anne Marie and John Gaventa (2001). Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery Goetz, Anne Marie and Rob Jenkins (2001). “Hybrid Forms of Accountability: Citizen Engagement in Institutions of Public Sector Oversight in India,” Public Management Review, Vol Jenkins, Rob and Anne Marie Goetz (1999). “Accounts And Accountabilit: Theoretical Implication of Right to Information Movement in India.” Third World Quarterly, vol Mulgan, Richard (2000). ‘Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept?, Discussion Paper No. 72., Graduate Program in Public Policy, Australian National University. Mulgan, Richard and John Uhr (2000). Accountability and Governance. Technical Report Discussion Paper no.71, Graduate Program in Public Policy, Australian National University. Narayan, Deepa, Raj Patel, Kai Schafft, Anne Rademacher and Sarah Koch-Schulte (2000). Voices of the Poor: Crying Out for Change Norton, Andy and Diane Elson (2002). What’s Behind the Budget? Politics, Rights and Accountability in the Budget Process Paul, Samuel (2002). Holding the State to Account: Citizen Monitoring in Action. Bangalore: Public Affairs Center. Ravindra, Adikeshavalu (2004). An Assessment of the Impact of Bangalore Citizen Report Cards on the Performance of Public Agencies 17 Reuben, William (2002) Reuben, William (2003). The Role of Civic Engagement an Social Accountability in the Governance Equation Schedler, A., L. Diamond and M. Plattner (eds.) (1999). The Self -Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies Shah, Parmesh and Deborah Youssef (eds.) (2002). Voices and Choices at a Macro Level: Participation in Country-Owned Poverty Reduction Strategies – A Workshop Report Singh, Janmejay and Parmesh Shah (2003). Making Services Work for the Poor: The Role of Participatory Public Expenditure Management Songco, Dan (2001). Accountability to the Poor: Experiences in Civic Engagement in Public Expenditure Management – A Synthesis Paper Wagle, Swarnim and Parmesh Shah (2001). Participation in Public Expenditure Systems: An Issue Paper. Wagle, Swarnim and Parmesh Shah (2003). Case Study 1 – Bangalore, India: Participatory Approaches in Budgeting and Public Expenditure Management Wagle, Swarnim and Parmesh Shah (2003). Case Study 5 – Uganda: Participatory Approaches in Budgeting and Public Expenditure Management Wagle, Swarnim and Parmesh Shah (2003). Case Study 2 – Porto Alegre, Brazil: Participatory Approaches in Budgeting and Public Expenditure Wagle, Swarnim and Parmesh Shah (2003). Case Study 3 – Gujarat, India: Participatory Approaches in Budgeting and Public Expenditure Management World Bank (2001). Filipino Report Card on Pro-Poor Services: Summary. Environment and Social Development Unit, East Asia and Pacific Region World Bank (2001). World Development Report 2001, “Attacking Poverty.” Washington: World Bank. World Bank (2002). Empowerment and Poverty Reduction, A Sourcebook. Washington: World Bank. World Bank (2002). Project Appraisal Document: Kapitbisig Laban Sa Kahirapan-Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of Social Services (KALAE-CIDSS) Project World Bank (2004). World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. 18 World Bank (2004a) World Bank (2004b). Transforming Institutions to Empower People – Social Development in World Bank Operations