Preview

Sioux Nation Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
760 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sioux Nation Case Study
The United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians was a case that was decided in the Supreme Court in 1980, but really goes back to the events surrounding the Fort Laramine Treaty of 1868. The events that led up to the Sioux Nation pursuing legal action can pretty much be summarized as the United States government using their military power and governmental law as a means to wrongfully and/or immorally take away land that was promised to the Sioux Nation in the Fort Laramine Treaty of 1868. The treaty stated that the Great Sioux reservation, including the Black hills, would be “set apart for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation" of the Sioux Nation (Sioux), and that no treaty for the cession of any part of the reservation would be valid …show more content…
Custer made its way into the Black Hills as an investigation of rumors of gold in the area. The investigation proved that the area was rich in natural resources such as its suitability for grazing, cultivation, mineral, and timber resources. The investigations findings gained widespread circulation, and there was soon pressure from the public on the United States government to open up the Black Hills area for settlement. For a while, the government used military force to prevent settlers from entering the Black Hills area. However, this only lasted a short period of time. Eventually, the government decided that the military should no longer provide resistance to miners attempting to occupy the Black Hills. These orders were to be carried out without any notice to the Sioux Nation. As more settlers began to flood the area of the Black Hills, the U.S. government felt that the only course of action that was sensible was to attempt to purchase the land from the Sioux. When the negotiations failed, the U.S. resorted to military …show more content…
Claims Court. This specific case ran until 1942, when the case was dismissed because it held the court could not second guess whether or not the compensation that the Sioux received as a result of the Manypenny treaty was adequate. The Sioux appealed in 1958, but the case ran all the way until 1972, where the Sioux were finally awarded damages for the deprivation of the land, but not interest from the number of years that it took for the Sioux to finally win the case. The court claimed “res judicata” or a thing that is already decided for the dismissal of the case in 1942. This denied the Sioux pursuit of over 100 years of paid interest. Finally in 1978, Congress passed an Act stating that the Court of Claims would be able to take new evidence in the case, without regard to res judicata. The Sioux were eventually awarded interest for the taking of the Black Hills, which was $17.1 million for the value of the land as of 1877, $450,000 for the value of the gold that was taken by miners from the Black Hills, and 100 years’ worth of interest at 5% per year which added up to $88 million. However, the Sioux have never officially accepted the money, because it would legally close any chance that they would have of re-claiming the Black

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soboba Tribe Case Study

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1888, the California Supreme Court adjudicated the Soboba tribe’s aboriginal occupancy rights over certain Mexican grant lands. This case, known as Byrne v. Alas, 74 Cal. 628, 16 Pac. 523 (1888) , resolved a dispute between plaintiff Byrne and the defendant Alas (and several other Soboba Indians), who both claimed title to the lands under the Estadillo grant. This land grant was confirmed under the 1851 Act of Congress that required the filing of lands with the federal Land Claims Board. Alas and the Indians, like Rogerio Rocha, were living on the lands within the Estadillo grant. The plaintiff, however, succeeding in filing the land grant within the two year period and therefore…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Sioux have staunchly maintained that the treaty ratified by the 1877 Act is void for several reasons, among which are the insufficient number of signatures, the coercive nature of the negotiations, and, most importantly, because the Black Hills were never for sale. Despite creating a Court of Claims to allow non-Indians to sue the federal government, claims by Indians were expressly barred until 1920. The Lakota’s appeal for monetary compensation, filed in 1923 and asserting that the seizure of the Black Hills constituted an illegal taking under the Fifth Amendment, represented the only legal avenue for any redress for the loss of their land, and for decades the Lakota pursued the claim despite the inadequacy of any monetary award (Lenane,…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the evidence that Zinn cites about the Indians, were federal treaties and federal laws that gave Congress, not the states, authority over the tribes. Jackson ignored this, and supported state action. Thousands of whites invaded and destroyed Indian property. Jackson ordered federal troops to remove them, but also ordered Indians as well as whites to stop mining. The white invaders seized land and stock that forced the Indians to sign leases, there soon after the Indians protested, sold alcohol to weaken resistance and even killed frame which Indians…

    • 565 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1874, George Armstrong Custer discovered gold in the Black Hills of Dakota where is Sioux’s reservation. Before the gold rich, in 1875, the U.S. Government made a negotiation with the Sioux for buying the Black Hills; however, the offer was refused because the Sioux considered this land as the sacred region. Ignoring the treaty agreements between the Sioux people and the Americans, the U.S. Army decided to invade this lands led to the battle of the Little Bighorn in June 1876. To the Sioux tribe, they decided to fight for their rights and preserve their reservation from white man; therefore, under the command of Sitting Bull, they were ready for combating so they left their reservation and gathered in encampments along the Little Bighorn…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boldt Decision Analysis

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ultimately the Boldt Decision created peace between the non-tribals and the tribals, this kept the individual rights that the Indians were in a gray area of having. Before the decision Indians didn’t have their rights as a U.S. citizen but when the ruling was passed it gave all the rights back to them and some more. Somethings are reported back to the state so there are number but not everything. Non-tribal people would say that Indians were only sharing fisheries for the money of the tribe. No matter what anyone says it was a huge part of the Native Americans to get their rights back from state. The early 1970’s is when “fish-ins” which was the tribes way of protesting eventually got the notice of the governments and made everything turn around for…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Charles Eastman was a young Dokota physician who went to Dartmouth College and Boston University. In 1890 he moved his practice as a physician to the Pine Ridge reservation in western South Dakota. His was part of Wahpenton and Mdewakanton Dakota tribe rather than Oglala Lakota and took pride in being Native. Upon his arrival, he experienced a disastourous dust storm and later would come across the aftermath of a massacre. The massacre was due to altercations of warfare on the northern Plains. The tribes consisted of the following: the Lokotas who were known as the Sioux from the western portion and the Dakotas who were known as the mdewakantons, Sisseton, Wahpekute, and Wahpeton from the east. The western tribes, the Lakotas, had claimed most of the northern Plains country which consisted of an area known as the Black Hills. Later, conflicts began to arise from neighboring regions, such as the United States. The United States insisted that they be allowed to access all the the regions resources. That's is when the Treaty of Fort Laramine was negotiated. This guarenteed the Lakotas ownership of the Black Hills along with hunting rights in South Dakota, Wyoming, and Montana. This promise lasted up until the discovery of gold was found in the Black Hills and therefore the United States broke all promises. They invaded the land of the Lakotas and reduced the portion of the land that was once theirs. None the less, the Lakotas felt cheated and were mortified by what the Americans had done to their homes, feed, and their families. Restricted in where they could set camp and where they could reside, many Lakotas, Yanktons, Yanktonais, and Santees began teaching the Native prophet in Nevada. Later, some of the Lakotas representitives met with Wovoka and brought back their own version of the Ghost Dance. " They believed that the shirts they wore in observing the ritual would make them invulnerable to bullets." In 1890 Daniel Royer, a federal agent, arrived at…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Land disputes and law jurisdiction cases had begun to appear quite frequently in the United States Supreme Court during the time the Indian Policy was put into effect after the war. Congress had to address the situation so they came up with the Indian Policy. It was concluded that, “discovery also gave the discoverer the exclusive right to extinguish Indian title either by purchase or by conquest. Natives were recognized only as temporary occupants of the land, and not as owners (Learn NC). The decision to move the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River, decided by the Jackson administration, was more of a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790’s.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States government took over the Native American’s land and forced them to go to an unethical place. It states in the article, “Why Native Americans don’t want Reparations” by Daniel R. Wildcat that, “The greatest harm done to us was the…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Saga Of The Sioux Analysis

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over 33 percent of the homes have no electricity or basic water and sewage systems forcing many to carry (often contaminated) water from local rivers daily for their personal needs. This is an ongoing struggle with the sioux nation and has been. This is because of poor insurance and no government help. In the nonfiction novel Saga of the Sioux the author Dwight Jon Zimmerman expresses how bad the sioux tribes have it in the conflicts that arise, the theme and it's all through the author's point of view.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crazy Horse is one on the most ambiguous yet legendary leaders in the American Indian history. The book Crazy Horse: A Lakota Life attempts to tell the story of one of the most feared by foes, and honored by allies American Indian leaders. Kingsley M. Bray draws from primary sources and other biographies to construct the tragic sequence of childhood conflict, deception, and misjudgments that shaped the leader’s adulthood affairs and eventually led to his demise. The book reveals a new biography not only in the warrior’s battles, but also the often time overlooked political and religious struggles he faced. It gives a new outlook on the man inside the legend.…

    • 666 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1, 16 (1831), Chief John Marshall made a decision that established a precedent. He stated that “the condition of the Indians in relation to the United States is perhaps unlike that of any other two people in existence… marked by peculiar and cardinal distinctions which exist nowhere else.”…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Indian Massacre

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1864 on the day of November 29th, 500 Cheyenne and Arapaho indians and around 1,000 english soldiers went to battle. The battle took place in Colorado along Sand creek, where 400 indians were killed. Black Kettle, the indian chief wanted protection for his people and asked the United States army. There was a treaty in 1851 that promised the Cheyenne the land. The next day on November 29th, they went to war. It was an unfair and bloody battle. The army was told to kill and scalp them all. The casualties were mostly women and children. After news spread of this horrible incident to the other tribes, they wanted revenge. The Sioux troops ambushed the troops of William J. Fetterman, there was not a single survivor. In 1866 the U.S. and Sioux…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As settlers pushed west, and the population grew, Native Americans were forced from their homelands and into the frontier. This was legal because of the "Indian Removal Act" of 1830, signed by President Jackson. In attempt to save themselves and their homes, the Native Americans formed an independent Cherokee nation and tried to fight the Supreme Court. America shut this down quickly, arguing that they were not a sovereign nation and refused to hear their case in court. Indians were relocated into the brutal west.…

    • 725 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I think back of the stories that I have heard about how the Native American Indians were driven from their land and forced to live on the reservations one particular event comes to my mind. That event is the Battle of the Little Big Horn. It is one of the few times that the Oglala Sioux made history with them being the ones who left the battlefield as winners. When stories are told, or when the media dares to tamper with history, it is usually the American Indians who are looked upon as the bad guys. They are portrayed as savages who spent their time raiding wagon trains and scalping the white settlers just for fun. The media has lead us to believe that the American government was forced to take the land from these savage Indians. We should put the blame where it belongs, on the U.S. Government who lied, cheated, and stole from the Oglala forcing Crazy Horse, the great war chief, and many other leaders to surrender their nation in order to save the lives of their people.<br><br>In the nineteenth century the most dominant nation in the western plains was the Sioux Nation. This nation was divided into seven tribes: Oglala's, Brule', Minneconjou, Hunkpapa, No Bow, Two Kettle, and the Blackfoot. Of these tribes they had different band. The Hunkpatila was one band of the Oglala's (Guttmacher 12). One of the greatest war chiefs of all times came from this band. His name was Crazy Horse.<br><br>Crazy Horse was not given this name, on his birth date in the fall of 1841. He was born of his father, Crazy Horse an Oglala holy man, and his mother a sister of a Brule' warrior, Spotted Tail. As the boy grew older his hair was wavy so his people gave him the nickname of Curly (Guttmacher 23). He was to go by Curly until the summer of 1858, after a battle with the Arapaho's. Curly's brave charged against the Arapaho's led his father to give Curly the name Crazy Horse. This was the name of his father and of many fathers before him (Guttmacher 47).<br><br>In the 1850's, the…

    • 2851 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Cruelty

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the trail of tears, innocent Cherokee Indians were forced off their land. Between 1790 and 1830 the population of Georgia increased greatly. The western push of the settlers created a problem. Georgians continued to take Native American lands and force them into the frontier. In 1830, the Congress of the United States passed the "Indian Removal Act." President Jackson quickly signed the bill into law. The Cherokees attempted to fight removal legally by challenging the removal laws in the Supreme Court and by establishing an independent Cherokee Nation. The court refused to hear any of the cases. Men, women, and children were taken from their land, herded into makeshift forts with minimal facilities and food, and then forced to march a thousand miles. The conditions of this trip were horrible. On this journey, many Indians died and were hurt. Over 4,000 Cherokee died as a result of the removal. These people clearly did not care about the Indians. They just wanted the land that was the best for them even if it meant kicking people off land that had no claim. They thought they were better than these Cherokees and figured it was okay to run them off the land. They did not care that thousands would die and get hurt because they hated them. The reason for this hatred was the fact that they were very selfish people and did not care. They thought it would benefit them…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays