Preview

Similarities Between Machiavelli And Martin Luther King

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
276 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Machiavelli And Martin Luther King
Comparison Paper: Machiavelli and King Dr. Martin Luther King and Machiavelli, great philosophical minds of their respective times, differed in their opinions of many issues. Their opinions on these issues can be gathered from their literary works. Yet, despite being near-diametrically opposed to each other, King and Machiavelli did agree on certain things. King and Machiavelli felt differently about what role a conscience should play in a leader's decision making process. King believed that a leader must use his conscience so that he may be just, while Machiavelli saw a conscience as a second-guessing pest that needs to be ignored. Machiavelli did not deny the presence of a conscience, but that a Kingly philosophy would make a leader weak.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu
    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Jonathan Edward
    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page

    Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Jonathan Edward

    Compare and contrast the common ideas that Martin Luther King Jr and Jonathan Edward shared within their sermon. For example, Martin Luther King Jr and Jonathan Edward show little similarity where they both deliver their sermon in a church of a congregation represent different beliefs on what to express to the people. Then Edward and King favor a differences of a time period of their sermon. Regarding the time period of Civil Rights Movement King demanded that America defend for all its citizens what is promised in the United States Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and stated that he would never give up until these natural rights were protected. King stated that “The issue is injustice. The issue is the refusal…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. And Henry David Thoreau
    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. And Henry David Thoreau

    Two different writers, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, argue that society is not at its finest and that every man has the responsibility to impact change and every many has the power to do so, only if man is an extremist for the greater good. King was a reverend but more importantly he was a dominant voice for thousands of persecuted people during the civil rights movement. From King expressing his knowledge and acting on them, he was obliged and jailed (he was obliged to jail?) within King's cell he composed a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. (transition?) Thoreau was a philosopher who contained all the qualities of a transcendentalist. Much time before King’s letter, Thoreau fabricated a response to when…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli
    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And The Transcendentalist Movement
    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And The Transcendentalist Movement

    Martin Luther King Jr. Vs. Transcendentalist Movement MLK Jr. was a inspirational man, who fought hard and strategically for what he believed in and cared for. MLK stood out and took a stand against his government, the social standard, and what others considered normal. Transcendentalist believe in individualism and that a person's thought process is what best for them.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Benjamin Franklin
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Benjamin Franklin

    Martin Luther King and Benjamin Franklin are two well known significant figures throughout American history. King and Franklin are both similar and different in many aspects of their lives when it comes to their personal lives, such as, spouse, life, and education, their political movements, and their awards. They are good influential leaders to their followers. They both are dedicated and hard workers in what they do.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Trump And Martin Luther King
    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Trump And Martin Luther King

    Martin Luther King had one statement that people connected with the African American people, the punch line stated, “I have a dream.” Not relating the two people because they are very different and all Americans unlike Trump hold King to the highest integrity. That being said, they are and were both prominent figures in society. Both prominent speakers had a message that they used to define their makeup. Trump has used his own rhetoric to the same effect and connects himself with the voters. Trump has used distinct message, which is “Make America Great Again.” During his campaign so far Trump has used, the language of the people. Malansky states, “Trump has a clear narrative, a master story that he sticks to”. He also goes on to say “He speaks…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Influence On The Prince
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's Influence On The Prince

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus And Martin Luther King Similarities
    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Oedipus And Martin Luther King Similarities

    The difference between Oedipus and Martin Luther is that Oedipus is a fictional character while Martin Luther King was an important figure in history. Oedipus was born in a wealthy royal family, however, right after he was born he was abandoned by his own parents for their fear that the prophecy that was prophesied will come true. With the kindness of a shepherd, Oedipus was saved and was raised by another royal family from a far away kingdom from his homeland. When Oedipus was old enough, he was told that the parents who raised him were not his real parents. On the other hand, Martin Luther King was an African-American. He was the middle child of Michael King Sr. and Alberta Williams King. The family of Martin Luther King Jr. were from rural…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Similarities Between Martin Luther King's Life And Accomplishments
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Are The Similarities Between Martin Luther King's Life And Accomplishments

    Martin Luther King Jr. was born on January 15, 1929 in Atlanta Georgia. King was the middle child of three and lived with both parents as well as often being with his grandfather A.D. Williams, a minister who originally moved to Atlanta. Williams took over the Ebenezer Church in Atlanta. Ebenezer consisted of less than twenty members, but Williams eventually turned into a tight knit congregation. Martin’s father, Michael King Sr. took over the congregation when Williams passed away and he would become a successful minister. Martin was a part of the public school system, where he earned good grades and was recognized as an intelligent student, but never took to religion despite his family’s close ties.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione
    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and Contrast Machiavelli and Max Weber
    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Machiavelli and Max Weber

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Petrarch and Machiavelli
    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Petrarch and Machiavelli

    In the fourteenth century, the humanist philosopher Francesco Petrarch wrote a letter entitled How a Ruler Ought to Govern His Sate. Nearly a century later, another philosopher by the name of Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a book about governing, The Prince. The two documents show many similarities in content and theme. While the two wrote in similar subject matter, it is clear that these philosophers possess distinctly different viewpoints on how a ruler should govern. In Petrarch’s How a Ruler Ought to Govern His Sate and Machiavelli’s The Prince, both philosophers possess different opinions on how a ruler ought to govern. In particular Machiavelli pays specific attention to the importance of appearing like a good ruler. There is much evidence to support this in the readings.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    St. Augustine vs. Machiavelli: a Comparison of the Good Society
    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages

    St. Augustine vs. Machiavelli: a Comparison of the Good Society

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics