Preview

Similarities Between Democrats And Republicans

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Democrats And Republicans
Within our modern era, many United States citizens fail to realize that we are conquered by two colossal titans. Though they have combated for over a century, it is evident that they are alike in many facets, and this ultimately enables them to avert notable conflict. These two behemoths are none other than the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. Though Democrats generally adopt more liberal platforms, Republicans have a tendency to foster more conservative ones; In spite of this superficial difference, there are many similarities that enable Democrats and Republicans to reconcile. To overcome their differences, it is imperative for Democrats and Republicans to understand the similarities and contrasts that exist between them. There are numerous facets in which Democrats and Republicans can be compared; for instance, Democrats state that proper tax reform is essential, as they perceive the current system to be flawed since it targets a certain demographic. Republicans additionally believe that modifications must be made due to their ideology that several groups of Americans are being overtaxed; they adopt the opinion that this threatens the economic success of many citizens while only benefitting a …show more content…
From issues concerning national security to those encompassing tax reform, the two parties can find considerable commonalities. It is indubitable that there are various topics that induce debates and arguments between Democrats and Republicans due to their differing ideologies; some of these include the necessity of climate change funding, as well as the legality of abortions. Though an exceedingly high number of differences is prominent, it is essential for each party to ultimately accept that it is possible to reconcile in spite of these contrasting ideals, and this will ensure that United States citizens can be peacefully guided by these political

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Incoming graduates of political science are aware of the restriction that the structure of the government imbeds, including the branches of the government generating unfair control of power in the executive branch, and partisan polarization. America’s basic construction of government, the three branches in parallel with the checks and balance system, creates problems such as a single executive leader inducing unfair policy making, and two main political party advancing partisan polarization. Partisan polarization is the ideology that an individual’s stance on political controversies are limiting of their party identification: republican, democrat. For example, controversies today revealing partisan polarizations are: equal reproductive rights,…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They are multiple between federalist and Democratic-Republicans. They are Differences Between the First Political Parties. Some of the differences between federalist and Democratic-Republicans is that federalist leader is Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans leader is Thomas Jefferson. The federalist has an alliance with British and the Democratic-Republicans has an alliance with French. Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson always disagreed on many things.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise is the ability to meet in the middle, but the middle ground has practically vanished in this country as Schmuhl states. Schmuhl expresses this by stating “it’s almost as though separate tribes now populate the country, each with a definite outlook in conflict with the opposite viewpoint or condition”. Schmuhl shares in his writing that America is missing the broader, common experience, that contributes to the unity of the country…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two conflicting interpretations of the constitution from the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped shape and form the two standing parties in the U.S. by creating opinions on still standing topics in America. The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped build what is now the Republicans and the Democratic parties we have in America now. Looking back on the Federalist views from the era of 1789-1800 they are very similar to what the Republicans believe in now. You can see the parralism of many ideas including thoughts on immagration and goverment regulation, as many in the Republican party do now, the Federalist support limiting immigrants. As well as the federalist the Democractic-Republicans have helped form the Democratic…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mules vs. Elephants

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As George Washington retired from his presidential position in 1796, he left a grim reminder to the people of the newly independent United States of America: the independence of states, peace at home and abroad, safety, prosperity, and liberty are all dependent upon the unity between states. To promote the national strength, he urges the people to place their identity as Americans above those of their state, region, and interests. In fear of the impeding sectionalism, Washington included a fair warning to the people of the United States, the dangers of political parties to the government and the country as a whole. The idea of political parties, although warned thoroughly by our very first president, continuously solidified itself into the core of American government until it has become two standing pillars of modern politics: the Democratic Mules and its counterpart, the Republican Elephants. In 21st century politics, these two reigning parties, both having changed and altered their focus over time, have maintained a core value system, ideas beliefs, and key constituencies, which are made apparent throughout political campaigns; no better evidence than the 2012 political party platforms articulates the political position which each party represents.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that political parties now actually have more political differences within the parties than between them this can be argued due to the fact that both the Democrat and the Republican parties have their conservative and liberal/moderate wings. For example the Democratic Party is divided into groupings such as the southern conservative Democrats with conservative views on most social, economic and foreign issues whereas the northern liberal democrats such as the late Kennedy, with liberal views on policy issues, and from 1980s the ‘New Democrats’ as well as Gore’s Democratic Leadership Council, highlighting a variety of differences within a political party in America. Similarly the Republicans have also been internally divided, having a variety of splits to do with social and fiscal conservatives, compassionate conservatives and neo conservatives. Therefore the Republican Party is often split between its more conservative and more moderate wings of the party.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton Ideals

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The differences between the two founding fathers of the United States, Hamilton and Jefferson, contributed to the creation of the first political parties and still form the basis of the two major parties today. The Federalist party with its belief in a strong national government identifies in that regard to the Democratic party of today. Today’s Republican party is a proponent of state and local rights with a limit to national government…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During our class discussion last week, we discussed about the polarization in our society in today’s world. In the reading by Abramowitz, he stated, “That problem was polarization. According to these observers, the sharp divisions between Democratic and Republican leaders were driving a wedge between party supporters in the electorate and alienating many moderate citizens from the political process.” This statement by Abramowitz shows us that Congress is still divided after decades of creating a political system to run America. We as a society need to be able to work together as a whole instead of being divided. There have been leaders in our society that tried to bring us together. However, no matter how hard they try to bring great minds…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some of the things that I agree with on the republican side is their stance on abortion and gun control. I agree that things such as Planned Parenthood should be shut down. I feel as if a person should not be able to abort a baby just because they want to. There are better options such as adoption, for people to turn to rather than just getting rid of a baby…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    o Summarize the role of political parties and their effectiveness as change agents versus preserving the status quo.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists believe in a strong federal system of governance, promotion of nationalistic government meanwhile the democratic- Republican believe in the promotion of the principles of republicanism over elitism. They both have different input of their philosophies too, the Democratic- Republicans believe and follow the Jeffersonian Democracy and Republicanism, while Federalist party follows Federalism, on the idea of industrialization and nationalism. Both parties also believed in liberty and freedom of the people. They opposed on every known issue. The Federalist Party believed in a strong central government while the Republican Party believed in the rights of the states. They reasoned saying that the liberty could only be protected if the power rested in the hands of the people. The Republicans had the view that the state could exercise powers only enumerated in the constitution. Federalists on other hand considered a loose reading of the constitution. They argued that state had the right to make laws necessary for the functioning of the government which were not forbidden by the…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These parties were different in many ways. For example, the Whigs were a party for modernization and the Democrats were a party for American tradition. Democrats also were against banks and corporations while the Whigs favored using federal funds to improve the country. The Democrats wanted to expand the country as quickly as possible by acquiring land through war or purchase. The Whigs on the other hand strongly opposed war and wanted a gradual gathering of land. The Whigs wanted internal growth while the Democrats wanted external growth. The Democrats wanted a more agrarian and rural America that focused on farming mainly. While the Whigs supported American industry, urban growth and free labor. The Whigs were mostly backed by Northerners who wanted industrialization, urbanization, and federal rights. That means that the Democrats were backed mainly by the Southerners who wanted agriculture, slavery, states' rights, and territorial expansion.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Republicans and Democrats are in general agreement about the qualities they are looking for in the president of the United States. Both sides demand honesty, management skills, integrity, and strong leadership skills in the nation’s president. Although they seem to bump heads, they also share many of the same goals for the economy, foreign policy, and personal liberties. Taking a closer look, their strategies may be unexpected, but the roots they are determined from are the same.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Polarization In Congress

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Representatives may vote against a bill primarily due to a squabble they have with a bill supporter, or his party. In “Polarizing Cues,” writer Nicholson explains his research and how he found that “in-party leader cues do not persuade but that out-party leader cues polarize” (1). Further, because they choose these actions, they take polarization to an exceedingly uncooperative level. In other words, instead of agreeing with those who share their ideals, the congressmen improve their credentials by striving to disagree with their opponents. These congressmen commit such acts primarily due to their polarized nature; ideally, polarized leaders should not disagree with another purely based on their credentials. Nicholson also explains that parties serve as tentative psychological in- and out-groups, which influence a voting politician’s decisions (1). While he contends that politicians themselves serve as polarizing cues, he discusses their positions as in- and out-group politicians based on the political parties. Therefore, polarization also stems from political parties. In removing the bipartisan system, perpetrators of such actions also disappear; the removal of political parties also implies a lack of party lines, the main cause of such polarized…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays