Preview

Similarities Between Aquinas And Nietzsche

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Aquinas And Nietzsche
The world revolves around right, wrong, and the basic belief of morals but what if these morals were simply a figment of imagination created by a single human and simply accepted? People around the world make decisions according to their beliefs and morals every day. Philosophers since the beginning of time have attempted to prove or disprove the existence of natural law which is what morals are based on. Some of the most significant philosophers to the topic are Aquinas and Nietzsche who specify the two sides of the argument. Although this is a topic discussed by mostly philosophers it also applies to the public because natural law is what dictates our every action. Natural law imposes rights and wrongs on the world but if it didn't exist then the only thing left would be the will of the strong to impose their power on the weak. This is not a new thing and we can see instances throughout history where people who agree with either side make an impact on the world. Natural law has always been assumed to exist regardless of recognition; despite its common acceptance natural law and morality are just an opinion which is enforced by the powerful to make the …show more content…
but what many people fail to acknowledge is that he could just as easily have stated that people should kill lie and steal. This basically means that one without god these morals could just as well be different or not exist at all and second this means that God simply placed his will over everyone which can be considered as a defense for its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first important similarity between the two is their view of man as an intermediary being. Kierkegaard sees man at an "intermediate stage" between what he once was and what he will become. He believes that to exist does not mean to be in an end state, but always striving for something more. Humans strive toward becoming subjective. For Kierkegaard, life is a transformation from essential to existential. Nietzsche sees man similar to this, He calls man a “bridge" rather than an “end". The important part of a man is his potential. Man is striving, but for something different. Nietzsche says that for man Ubermensch, the ideal man or Superman, is the goal. It’s a representation of man at a constant battle to overcome itself. The Superman must…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Jersey vs. T.L.O

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Society’s Morals are values which we attribute to a system of beliefs, typically a religious system, but it could be a political system or some other set of beliefs. These values get their authority from something outside the individual- a higher being or higher authority.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another issue with any divine command morality theory is that we have no confirmation that there even is the essential God, a great deal less which God's commands are the commands of that God. There are many distinctive moral frameworks credited to God. This is so even inside of the umbrella of Christian belief in a higher power; more so when we consider different belief…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is now nearing the end of this fall semester and throughout these months I have encountered many new philosophies. Many of my ideals have been challenged and I have had to myself, confront my beliefs. Most recently, I’ve discovered the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and Gloria Anzaldúa. Compared with the other philosophies, these two seem to be the most similar in at least their belief that there is no one right way to the good life, but rather there are many and are suited to each individual.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, Jesus said that if anyone looks lustfully at a woman, not his wife, he is guilty of adultery. Thus, while the old commandments condemned the evil act, Jesus condemned the evil in the heart. He commanded truthfulness in speech, and forbade swearing, saying that one's every word should be as true as an oath. He told His followers that not only must they love one another but also their enemies, and must pray for those who kill them. He bans drunkenness and every form of immorality and he said that God's children must be perfect as their Father in heaven is perfect. No standard could be higher than that.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is a belief or set of beliefs about what it right behavior and what is wrong behavior. What is acceptable by society, and the degree of ‘rightness’ and ‘wrongness’, varies among different individuals.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes vs. Aquinas

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I found Descartes’ way of thinking very interesting when compared to Aristotle. Descartes doubts the existence of God when he decides to start over and completely ignore his senses. He states in his third meditation, “…and I do not yet even know for sure whether there is a God at all…I must examine whether there is a God, and if there is, whether he can be a deceiver.” (25) Descartes makes a goal for himself to find out if there is a God and who he is. According to Aquinas we will never be able to understand who or what God is. We are finite and so we cannot understand the infinity of God. We can only know He is and always will be because He has instilled that bit of knowledge within us. So when Descartes says we cannot have the idea of finite without the idea of infinite, he claims we understand what God is. But I would disagree and take Aquinas’ side because what Descartes is understanding is not who God is entirely; it is an idea of what he is like. We as human beings, can contemplate God and try to understand what makes him, him. But since we are so limited in our knowledge, we will never comprehend our God. Later on page 32, Descartes starts to say it does not matter that he does not grasp the infinite only that he understands it. In line 47 he says he sees no reason that his knowledge cannot increase to infinity and use that infinite knowledge to understand all of the other perfections of God. This idea cannot ever happen because we humans have a beginning. God is the one who made us, but no one made God. His knowledge is truly infinite because he, himself has no beginning and no end. We on the other hand were born, will die, and though are spirits will join God in heaven, he can still choose to end our spirits existence. I began to agree with Descartes as he realizes that even if his knowledge increases more and more, it will never actually be infinite because it will never reach the point where it can no longer increase. (pg 32) I liked his quote. ” God,…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Morals mark actions as good or evil but the genesis of these morals is an enigma. Some credit God with establishing the morals that must be…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, plenty of people who don't believe in God still make judgments of right and wrong, and think no one should kill another for his wallet even if he can be sure to get away with it. Second, if God exists, and forbids what's wrong, that still isn't what makes it wrong. Murder is wrong in itself, and that's why God forbids it (if He does.) God couldn't make just any old thing wrong-like putting on your left sock before you’re right-simply by prohibiting it. If God would punish you for doing that it would be inadvisable to do it, but it wouldn't be wrong. Third, fear of punishment and hope of reward, and even love of God, seem not to be the right motives for morality. If you think it's wrong to kill, cheat, or steal, you should want to avoid doing such things because they are bad things to do to the victims, not just because you fear the consequences for yourself, or because you don't want to offend your Creator.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apol 104 Worldview

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Question of Morality is, what is right or wrong based upon God’s scripture in the biblical worldview? Psalm 4, tells us “lift up the light of your countenance upon us, Lord” implying that what is good and bad will be impressed upon us. Genesis 3, shares with us Adam’s poor moral behavior of eating the forbidden fruit.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion, I think that both views are partially correct. I think that everyone as humans know the difference between right and wrong. Therefore everyone would have some sort of morals with or without the law being in place. Also, I think that the standard of morals and ethics have been persuaded by certain laws being put in place. I think without the law, small crimes such as stealing a small amount of food, would be accepted without any kind of…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Aquinas and Zhu Xi have a great deal of similarities and differences in their writings. By comparing the two it can be said that, they both agree on the fact that a virtuous individual, whether a king or a superior human, should not dwell in selfish desires. Aquinas and Zhu Xi believe in learning as a means for self-improvement. However, they approach learning in different ways. The king and the superior human both need to come to the realization of their purpose in order to be able to better their society. Finally, it can be said that Zhu Xi’s way is more self-centered in comparison to Thomas Aquinas’ method that aims to the betterment of a society. Overall the two scholars have high standards for the virtuous human, only by following…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato vs. Nietzsche

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The central ideas that two great philosophers, Plato and Friedrich Nietzsche, talked about were the reality and appearance; and what they mainly focused on is where we as humans stand between these two. Of course, regarding the fact that Plato and Nietzsche lived in different time periods, they had their differences that conflict with each other’s theories. But they do have something to agree upon; they both argue that humans live in an illusory world of our own that we think is reality when we actually are not. One important idea they disagree on is their concepts on what is reality and what is truth. Plato’s theory is mostly based on his cave allegory where he explains human’s conditions. I will explain the similarities and differences between Plato and Nietzsche through the cave allegory.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We would need to revisit theories about natural law and learn them with the basic concepts of what is right and what is wrong [Kries, 2007]. According to Kries (2007) the problem with natural law is that each human being knows the natural law, but it is in interpreting and have a written codified piece of work that makes natural law a problem to be used legally. Until we are able to decide upon what is right and what is wrong morally, not legally natural law can always be interpreted in many different ways. If we were to think about natural law, it would be defined as a person’s sense of morale. Whether they think something is right or wrong. Now according to this, if we look at a murderer or psychopaths, in their minds their concept of natural law could be distorted into thinking what they are doing is morally right. According to Kries (2007) it is our human nature that our soul is what defines natural law to us and there are 3 parts to human nature: the body, spirit and soul. Our soul has to parts the higher part and the lower part. The higher part is reason and lower part is…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deciding if an action is moral can vary greatly depending on which theory is applied in order to make a decision. A Divine Command Theorist would evaluate morality by consulting religious or sacred texts and by possibility consulting a religious authority on said texts. Through this approach the Divine Command Theorist would be looking for guidance from the “word of God” on the matter. A Natural Law Theorist on the other hand would attempt to decide if an action is moral by deciding the action's purpose and how it fits with the natural working order of the world, this idea is often coupled with the influence of religion as it's ideas are incorporated into many religions like Christianity. They would try through their version of science to…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays