Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Significance of the Mithridatic and Parthian Wars to the Political Developments of Republican Rome

Best Essays
2247 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Significance of the Mithridatic and Parthian Wars to the Political Developments of Republican Rome
How significant were the wars against Mithridates and the Parthians in the political developments of the Roman Republic between 78BC and 31BC?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

The wars against Mithridates and the Parthians in the period 78-31BC are acutely significant on the political developments of the Roman Republic. The expansion of the Roman Empire into Eastern settlements took place under the leadership of an oligarchy, thus, politicians had to distinguish themselves through military achievements to be elected to gain influence in the Republic. Throughout the Mithridatic War, Pompey used his military victory over Mithridates in 63BC in order to gain political recognition in Rome. However, due to the constant fear of the emergence of autocratic behaviour, the senate refused to ratify Pompey’s Eastern Settlement. The intransigence of the oligarchy ultimately stimulated the formation of the first triumvirate, a strategic alliance which intimidated senatorial powers. Correspondingly, this increased intimidation between the three triumvirs, leading to Crassus’s unsuccessful Parthian campaign in which his death marked the breakdown of the triumvirate. Political instability within Rome spurred the outbreak of the civil war providing Caesar with immense autocratic power, undermining that of the senate. Due to Caesar’s assassination in 44BC, the collapse of the Republican political system in Rome was provoked through Antony’s unsuccessful assumption of Caesar’s Parthian campaign and the failure of the second triumvirate. The results of the Mithridatic and Parthian Wars were significant in their stimulation of the downfall of the Roman Republic and provided an insight into Imperial Rome.

The outbreak of the Third Mithridatic War marked the challenging of senatorial power within Roman politics through the increased dominance of influential politicians. Rome came into “renewed conflict with Mithridates of Pontus through the protracted struggle” against the piracy in the Eastern Mediterranean and the acquisition of Bithynia by the Roman Empire. This subsequently posed a threat to Mithridates’ kingdom, as Rome would have complete control over the entrance to the Black Sea. Optimate leader, Lucius Lucullus, gained political recognition in Rome through his command to “meet the menace of Mithridates” in 74BC as a response to Mithridates’ invasion of the new Roman province Bithynia. Lucullus’s offensive against Mithridates led to his invasion of the eastern state of Armenia in attempt to capture the Pontic King, however he preceded this attack without senatorial permission. His campaign was brought to a close as “he had failed to produce a decisive defeat” and “there was growing campaign in Rome to recall him”. His recall was further spurred due to the undying resentment of the Roman equestrian class as his attempt to assist the economic crisis in his province of Asia “curtailed their profiteering activities in Asia”. Criticism escalated amongst the financiers arguing that he “prolonged the war for his own glory and profit”. Through the restoration of power for the tribunes, Pompey used the voice of his tribune Gabinius in order to gain command over the pirates through the legislation of Lex Gabinia in 67BC, alongside with a large amount of resources “which to one man was unprecedented in Rome”. Pompey was conscious that he needed to defeat Mithridates decisively therefore he “stamped Roman authority firmly upon the entire area surrounding Pontus”. Following this, he surrounded the Mediterranean with Roman Provinces and established a network of client kingdoms to ensure internal stability and to provide a valuable buffer against any Parthian expansion from the East. Pompey became renown for his settlement of the East as he “formed the basis of a defensive frontier system that was to last for over 500 years”. His unmitigated success over his settlement displayed Pompey’s abilities as an “organiser, administrator and diplomat”. The Optimates and the Populares feared his enhanced reputation amongst Roman politics as he posed a threat to the Republic through his autocratic behaviour. The senate rebuffed Pompey on his return from the East as it “had a profound impact on the political constellations in Rome,” as the Optimates believed “he stood for nothing but the accumulation of personal power… who followed in Sulla’s lead in using military command to gain political power in Rome”. The threat of Mithridates enabled Pompey to embark on a campaign which triggered wide attention from the East and from the political sphere in Rome. The senate feared his growing influence as politicians viewed his power as threatening to the Republican constitution and their resentment towards Pompey led to the formation of the First Triumvirate which paved the path of the disempowerment of the traditional political developments in Rome.

The influence of the First Triumvirate over the traditional political developments in Republican Rome was severed due to disastrous outcome of Crassus’s Parthian campaign. Through his joint consulship with Pompey in 55BC, Crassus used his granted province of Syria as a launchpad to initiate a war against the vast Parthian Empire which extended from the Syrian frontier to central Asia. Crassus’s motivation for this crusade was driven by his determination to claim “military glory to rival that of his fellow Triumvirs” and to “gain the status of the Greatest Man in Rome” as he was cast in the shadow under Caesar and Pompey’s military achievements and acclamation. War against these influential men would be “glorious and profitable” and with the support of the Optimates, Crassus left for Syria in November. The Romans grew intimidated by Crassus as he took with him seven legions going against the legislation Lex Trebonia, which fuelled widespread suspicion of his motives in relation to Parthia. In 53BC, Crassus crossed the Euphrates and declared war against the Parthians, however his army was attacked as he undermined the strength of the Parthian’s “formidable cavalry” and Crassus was killed in battle at Carrhae. The death of Crassus heavily impacted the alliance between the now two Triumvirs as growing jealousy between Pompey and Caesar in collaboration with Caesar’s increased desire for imperium, led to the deterioration of the First Triumvirate. The political developments in Rome were not only disturbed by the breakdown of the First Triumvirate but furthermore, “Roman prestige suffered a severe blow… and thereafter the frontiers of the Roman Empire were no longer safe from incursions by the Parthians”. As a result of his death, Crassus’s Parthian campaign in Carrhae “virtually spelt the end of the First Triumvirate” as the power between the Triumvirs became unequal as jealousy prompted further escalated the rivalry between Pompey and Caesar. Moreover, his campaign created tensions between Parthia and Rome and prefigured other Roman General’s expeditions to attack Parthia. The impact of Crassus’s death at Carrhae was ultimately a main factor that led to the outbreak of the Civil War in 49BC.

Crassus’s abrupt invasion on the Parthian Empire impacted Roman politics and led to Marc Antony’s assumption of Caesar’s incomplete campaign in order to position himself as Caesar’s heir and military successor. Caesar was forced to devise plans to continue the attack on the Parthians as Crassus had “laid the seeds of a long-lived feud between two powers which by nature were complementary rather than antagonistic”. Caesar had enforced his dictatorship in 49BC and intended to “hold and wield power in the future” leading towards his implementation of absolute power. The general aimed to leave Rome on the 18th of March in 44BC with 16 freshly raised Roman legions with determination to definitively conquer the expansive empire in revenge of the murder of his fellow triumvir. However, his expedition was not executed as he was assassinated two days before his expected departure in the Senate house on the Ides of March by a crowd of “aristocratic conspirators” including Brutus and Cassius. Caesar’s death marked the degradation of Republican Rome and amplified the struggle between the Republicans and the Caesarians. The immediate result of the dictator’s death was the formation of the second triumvirate established between Lepidus, Octavian and Marc Antony in 43BC, which aimed to equally govern the expansive Roman Empire through a collegial alliance. Antony was disturbed by Caesar’s appointment of Octavian as his heir in his will, as he was “perturbed by Octavian’s growing influence within Roman politics”. Despite both their efforts to eliminate the authority of Brutus and Cassius in Roman provinces, jealous tensions continued to grow between Antony and Octavian in the fight for absolute power. In realisation that there needed to be political bonds between these statesmen, at the end of 43BC, “the three leaders of the Caesarians, Antony, Lepidus and Octavian, met under strict conditions… near Bononia… and agreed to form a private alliance and jointly control the state”. Thus, in less than two years after Caesar’s death, “Rome found herself saddled with three dictators instead of one”. Octavian and Antony cooperatively defeated the threat of Brutus and Cassius at the Battle of Philippi in 42BC. This led to the exclusion of their “absent colleague Lepidus from the inner circle of power” on the grounds that “he had not proved himself value in Italy” and was suspected of having “treacherously made contact with Sextus Pompeius”. “A renewed civil war broke out in Italy” as Sextus Pompeius in assistance with Antony’s wife Fulvia, stirred a rebellion whilst Antony was absent from Rome. His absence was dangerous to his political position as Octavian received immense prestige in his defeat of Pompeius in 36BC and “the Roman people began to look to him as the only man who could free them from the scourge of civil war”. Whilst Antony was confronted by the collapse of his position in the West, he was under immense pressure in his attack on the Parthians in the East. He attempted to restore Roman prestige through the intention to “reorganise the relationship between the direct and indirect Roman rule” in the Eastern province of Parthia. Antony’s launched attack on Parthia in 36BC “reflected Julius Caesar’s plans for his unrealised Parthian invasion that had been aborted due to his assassination”. However, his army was defeated in the battles and could not obtain a Parthian stronghold, as historian Jonathon Roth describes Antony as “not a very astute or creative strategist”. As a result of these defeats, Antony depended on his relationship with Cleopatra and the support of her influence in Alexandria in order to receive money to fund his continuous battle against the Parthians. The period of 33-32BC marked the breakdown of relations between Antony and Octavian, due to the wide criticism expelled by one another undermining each other’s positions. Octavian accused Antony of “wanting to destroy the freedom of the Roman people and bring them under the yoke of the Egyptian queen”, and in response, Antony replied accusing Octavian of “having broken his word several times and of illegitimately deposing Lepidus”. Anthony’s failed campaign in Parthia and his affiliations with Cleopatra “both made a bad impression in Italy,” and both performed a significant role in the breakdown of the Second Triumvirate, leading to Octavian’s success over Antony in the civil war battle of Actium in 31BC.

The outcome of the Mithridatic and Parthian Wars imposed direct implications on the political developments in Republic Rome, as they led towards a monarchial governing system. The impact of the Mithridatic War upon the political sphere in Rome encouraged the construction of the First Triumvirate, limiting the authority of the Senate and enabling the triumvirs to receive autocratic power. The failure of the Parthian campaign by Crassus and Marc Antony in correlation with the death of Caesar signified the dissolution of Republican Rome. The war marked the collapse of the political developments in Rome due to internal jealousies and ambitions of politicians who outbalanced the power of other political groups such as the senate body and the triumvirates. In a period of political instability and social unrest, the significance of these wars culminated the demise of the Roman Republican Empire.

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Bringmann, K. A History of the Roman Republic, Munich, Polity Press, 2007
[ 2 ]. Gruen, E. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic, California, University of California Press, 1974
[ 3 ]. Swain, H. Davies, M. E. Aspects of Roman History, USA, Routledge, 2010
[ 4 ]. Ibid
[ 5 ]. Ibid
[ 6 ]. Ibid
[ 7 ]. Plutarch, Pompey
[ 8 ]. Swain, H. Davies, M. E. Aspects of Roman History, Routledge, USA, 2010
[ 9 ]. Ibid
[ 10 ]. Bringmann, K. A History of the Roman Republic, Munich, Polity Press, 2007
[ 11 ]. Plutarch, Pompey
[ 12 ]. Mackay, C. Ancient Rome: a Military and Political History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004
[ 13 ]. Rodgers, N. Ancient Rome, London, Hermes House, 2008
[ 14 ]. Swain, H. Davies, M. E. Aspects of Roman History, Routledge, USA, 2010
[ 15 ]. Ibid
[ 16 ]. Gruen, E. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic, California, University of California Press, 1974
[ 17 ]. Shotter, D. The Fall of the Roman Republic, London, Routledge, 1994
[ 18 ]. Cary, M. Scullard, H. H. A History of Rome: Down to the Reign of Constantine, Bedford Publishers, UK, 1975
[ 19 ]. Ibid
[ 20 ]. Swain, H. Davies, M. E. Aspects of Roman History, USA, Routledge, 2010
[ 21 ]. Bringmann, K. A History of the Roman Republic, Munich, Polity Press, 2007
[ 22 ]. Ibid
[ 23 ]. Ibid
[ 24 ]. Holland, T. Rubicon: The Triumph and the Tragedy of the Roman Republic, Little Brown, Great Britain, 2003
[ 25 ]. Bringmann, K. A History of the Roman Republic, Munich, Polity Press, 2007
[ 26 ]. Ibid
[ 27 ]. Ibid
[ 28 ]. Ibid
[ 29 ]. Mackay, C. Ancient Rome: a Military and Political History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004
[ 30 ]. Bringmann, K. A History of the Roman Republic, Munich, Polity Press, 2007
[ 31 ]. Roth, J. Roman Warfare, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2009
[ 32 ]. Ibid
[ 33 ]. Ibid
[ 34 ]. Ibid
[ 35 ]. Mackay, C. Ancient Rome: a Military and Political History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ceasar's Gallic Campaign

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Roman republic at the birth of Caesar (100BC) was a stagnant and decaying political structure that had outgrown the area it was set to govern. The Gallic War gave Caesar the staging point he needed to lay the ground work for the Roman Empire. Frank Herbert an American historian states “ The stakes in conflict do not change. Battle determines who will control the wealth or its equivalent” Herbert’s comment concerning the causes of conflict can be considered accurate in relation to Caesar’s Gallic war because it provided Caesar and Rome with great wealth and in turn gave Caesar more influence. Detailed examination of What the Gallic war was, Why it occurred and the consequences of the war will prove that the Caesar’s Gallic war gave him the wealth and power needed to lay the foundation for the Roman Empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Struggles

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antony’s rule of rome soon became challenged, by Caesar’s nephew Octavius. Octavius was a more experienced in military altercations and with ruling from a legislative standpoint. He claimed the money of Caesar as the rightful heir, but Antony spent it “in the interest of the roman people” which did not include giving the roman people a cut of the money. This caused many of the people to rally against antony in favor of Octavius. Another challenger to Antony’s authority was Cicero. Cicero won the philippics against Antony, which is essentially a war of words. This led to the prevention of Antony joining forces with Octavius. Even with the present challenges, the system of government remained the same and a second Triumvirate was formed to take the place of the…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the Second Punic War, the Senate became the supreme power and as a result, many changes occurred throughout Rome. The ruling Oligarchy abused their power, caring more for their own material interests than the welfare of the republic. As a result major problems occurred throughout Rome. Serious economic social problems occurred, both rural and urban, causing grave distress among many Roman citizens. There was a military crisis, with lack of eligible recruits for the legions, aggravated by the Spanish and Sicilian wars. There was tension in the oligarchy between leading factions as they struggled for political superiority. And amongst all these problems was the failure of the ruling nobility within the senate to deal with these problems.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discuss the political and economic changes and continuities that occurred as Rome went from a Republic to an Empire…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome, one of the world’s greatest empires, was able to prosper in the Mediterranean world for centuries, yet, Rome’s downfall was inevitable. As Rome ascended into to power, the amount of territory they had became immensely vast. The Roman army had seized land from modern-day Scotland to Spain, and the entire Mediterranean Sea, along with colonies in North Africa, Egypt, the Middle East, and Asia Minor. Rome was able to harmoniously sustain their reign throughout the first two centuries, but they had slowly started staggering downward throughout the next three centuries. Rome’s problems had notably increased, they had started losing power, and eventually were overthrown. The primary cause for the Roman Empire’s fall was political instability.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Remple, G. (2002). Rome. From a Republic to an Empire. p. 3. Retrieved on June 29th,…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Second Triumvirate Essay

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages

    * Octavian was in Macedonia at the time of Caesar’s assassination and did not learn of his inheritance till his return to Rome.…

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome Army

    • 1305 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Polybius, a Greek historian, said that the Roman Empire had many elements that lead them to conquer the entire civilized world in fifty-three years, which is why they are revered as one of the strongest empires in ancient world history. They are considered one of the strongest empires of ancient history because of their ability to never surrender and their extreme knowledge for fighting. At Rome’s peak they had conquered everyone and had shown the world that fighting the Roman Empire would not end well. We know this because Polybius makes a strong account of how they were able to march over anyone in their way and how their way of fighting was so organized that every able bodied man could fight in the army and know the Roman system perfectly.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 509 b.c., Rome changed their government to a Republic which became an internal conflict amongst the Romans. This was largely due to the fact that the Republic had a Senate and a Consul, both of which were positions of authority only given to the wealthy men of Rome, also called Patricians. Many disputes among the people of Rome began to arise, and acts of violence even began to occur within the empire walls. It was not until the less wealthy citizens found an officer that would vote in their favor and veto the bills of the rich. Once the people of Rome solved the political issue, and had a stable government, they began to take control…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From 218 to 202 BCE, the Carthaginian general Hannibal Barca launched his brutal campaign to crush the early Roman republic and would ultimately be defeated on the plains of Zama. Despite these individual events being separated by a century, Hannibal’s second Punic war against Rome generated the factors necessary for the Republic to professionalize her military. The war brought about massive political discourse, social discourse, and a more rampant depletion of the overall manpower in Italy than before. This chaos would allow the Gracchi brothers Tiberius and Gaius to be elected as tribunes in the Roman Senate. Their combined attempts at agrarian reforms, in turn, would brew even greater political uproar between the people and the Senate. The…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political alliances were essential for the advancement of Caesar’s career, especially when facing the opposition of the Senate. Caesar’s understanding of the Roman Republican system allowed him to formulate relationships that could be used for his own political gain. Caesar’s most significant political coalition was ‘The First Triumvirate’, an unofficial alliance that constituted Pompey, Crassus and Caesar, formed in 60BC. Plutarch defines the alliance as the “most potent political force in Rome”. Ostensibly, the alliance was mutually beneficial Caesar’s allies, allowing Pompey to grant land to his veterans and achieve the “ratification of his acts in the provinces across the seas”; and Crassus hoped he might achieve “pre-eminence in the state” due to his powerful alliances (Peterculus).…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Third Mithridatic war (75-63 B.C.) was the last and longest of a series of conflicts involving the Roman Republic and other regional powers. The long fought war eventually led to a total victory for the Republic, with the Pontic Kingdom who was the belligerent in the previous wars, coming to an end. The Third war was triggered by the death of the ruler of Nicomedes IV, the King of Bithynia.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Identity Essay

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Portrayed in myths was a Roman triumph in 396 BCE regarding the town of Veii. Before this, “Rome’s relations with the outside world were entirely unremarkable”, in fact, “its direct interactions were mainly local”. This, however, was turned around in 396 BCE when Rome, who, for reasons obscure, decided to attack its neighboring city of Veii.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle of Actium has constituted to a potent and enduring turning point in the course of Roman history for it signalled the commencement of a new era in Rome led by Augustus with his new political regime. Modern historian and Classicist, Sir Ronald Syme in his book The Roman Revolution first published in…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The public sphere of Rome, which included religious norms, social settings, as well as some other cultural divides, has been known to greatly affect the Roman political system throughout, from its inception to its fall. Our world has seen many great empires and perhaps the most popular one by name is the Roman Empire. A great number of books have been written on this subject, many movies have been made, and the Roman Empire remains rich in our minds to this date. The Roman history involves some great moments as it recounts such great leaders as Julius Caesar (see Picture 1)[1], the birth of Christ and his exploits, and then the setting up of the Church and the Vatican by Constantine. Just like any other state or empire, the Roman Empire was also much affected by the people that were its subjects. These people had their own religion throughout the various epochs of the Empire, and these people had their own norms and practices. The Roman citizen was instantly recognized by his toga (See Illustration 1)[2] and the Roman army by his uniform (See Picture 2)[3] The political structure of the Roman Empire was affected by the way that its citizens had behaved during the various times, including their religion, their social structure, gender relations and economics. This paper shall follow the course of the Roman Empire through history, from its inception to its decline and fall and relate how the various factors were able to influence the Empire in different ways. It is also important to realize that the Roman public was able to influence the political structure of the Roman Empire.…

    • 4427 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays