Preview

Should There Be a Nuclear Power Plant in Saskatchewan?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
449 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should There Be a Nuclear Power Plant in Saskatchewan?
Should There Be A Nuclear Power Plant In Saskatchewan?

I think there should be a nuclear power plant built in Saskatchewan because I believe it would contribute to the province a great deal. There is a growing need for power in Saskatchewan.

Right now in Saskatchewan there is a need for more power. There has question as to putting a nuclear plant is Saskatchewan This I think is the ideal choice of power plants because on 1 bundle of uranium is equal to the power output of 400 tones or 1900 barrels of oil. This is more than adequate to cope with our need for power. Also one good example of our need is that during winter
Saskatchewan has to buy power from other provinces in order to have, that is how serious the shortage is.

In Saskatchewan there is lots of unemployment. Building a nuclear power plant would create more jobs. This would also benefit the government because less people would be collecting unemployment insurance and welfare. Thus adding to the amount the government could be spending on other things such as fixing highways, better healthcare, and more funding to school.

Nuclear power is also a lot environment wise. Nuclear power requires a mere fraction of the space that is required to set up a solar, wind, or hydroelectric generating station which. This will allow more space for private landowners and will also keep land prices at a lower cost. Nuclear power is also a much cleaner operating type of fuel. The amount of waste produced is from a nuclear power plant is not even a fraction of the amount of sulfur, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxide produced by a coal plant. By building a nuclear power we will reduce acid rain and not add to the global warming. Hydro stations form algae in lakes which reduces the amount of oxygen in the water making it harder for marine life to survive. Although the damage nuclear accidents cause is very bad the risk of a accident is not very probable, so in the long run the damages caused by a nuclear power are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tucker states that nuclear energy is much more efficient compared to the contemporary methods of energy creation. It takes a substantially smaller amount of resources and time to produce nuclear energy than it does to run a coal mine. The use of nuclear energy would have less of a negative effect on the environment because there are far less raw materials and mines that could pollute the air, water, and land. Tucker believes the production process of harvesting natural gas and turning it into energy is too slow, and is being slowed by government regulations. Tucker argues that natural methods of producing energy such as hydro, wind, and solar are all too reliant on uncontrollable factors, and far less productive even when all factors are ideal.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the development of alternative sources of energy such as solar power and clean coal.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the city of Houston should use nuclear energy to provide energy to the fourth largest city in America. Nuclear energy is the most efficient and reliable source of large-scale, around-the-clock source of power. Nuclear power plants maintain a national average reliability between 85 and 90 percent. Many power plants routinely operate at 93 to 95 percent capacity over extended periods. By splitting uranium atoms inside a reactor in a process called fission we create a huge amount of energy. At the moment nuclear energy is not renewable. This is because in the process creating nuclear power uranium 235 is needed and uranium 235 is fossil fuel. There are many factors that are not in the equation of nuclear energy currently. Such as the argument made by Bernard L Cohen, a former professor at University of Pittsburgh who said, the term…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In North Carolina currently, nuclear power plants produce 90 percent of the state’s emissions free power already. So if we expand nuclear power plants that makes a lot of sense for North Carolina. North Carolina already has 5 nuclear power plants making us a major producer of nuclear power compared to other states. North Carolina also ranked fifth in 2011 in producing nuclear energy.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are numerous advantages of nuclear power; the purity of the energy manufacturing process is one of them. While nuclear energy is not pollutant free, it also does not emit nearly the amount of pollutants as various fossil fuel energies. Nuclear power plants do not release air emissions, such as carbon dioxide, but the necessary process of mining for uranium does. This is, arguably, the most essential feature of substituting fossil fuels with nuclear power. The incineration of fossil fuels has greatly contributed to the global warming problems we are having today. In 2010 alone, approximately 5,800 million metric tons of carbon dioxide was released into the atmosphere. (EPA, 2010.) Nuclear power can assist our modern society in continuing our lifestyles, while still relieving the atmosphere of the massive amount of pollutants that are bequeathed on to it consistently.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    living wastes known to man. The technology to safely dispose of this waste has yet to…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The governor of PA I think that building a nuclear power plant in East Pennsboro Township is a bad idea since it's expensive to run a nuclear power plant. It a good chance that it might be disaster in Pennsylvania,do remember what happened last time when there is a nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania it killed some of the people that lived there and homes.I know that you think that it will be worth it since generate energy faster than other sources but It's a nonrenewable source so it's can’t be made since it been made a long time ago. It might be a lot of nuclear waste, but sooner so we will not a nuclear power plant if we are going to run out. I know that other people are making nuclear power plants, but it don’t mean you have to make one too. It a lot of accidents that happen to other countries that have nuclear power plants.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, nuclear power is too expensive. For instance “Many supporters and critics say nuclear power biggest impediment is economic.”(8,8) Even people who agree with nuclear power agree that the cost is too high the amount of workers and materials that will be needed and how long the process is too much money for the economy. Like this quote states “But in reality is wasting yet more time and money pursuing the nuclear nightmare would be, too expensive, too risky.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The good things about nuclear energy start with the environmental benefits. If done right, nuclear power will emit less than one one-hundredth of the green house gasses than coal or gas power. Coal and oil plants emit large amounts of CO2, which is proven to cause global warming, while nuclear energy creates no CO2 emissions. Compared to coal, natural gas, wind, and solar power, nuclear energy per kWh (kilowatt-hour) is the cheapest to produce. Although the running cost of nuclear power plants is already low, we are striving to lower the cost further by using new technology and by trying to better understand how nuclear energy works.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Plants

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States should put the money which they would have used in order to renew their power plants, and use it to research others ways of receiving power. For example, if the U.S. developed solar power more and made it less costly, as well are more convenient for the average person, then there would be no more problems. In the past century many advances have been made in terms of energy. Power plants became the main source of energy, and towards the end of the century, new advances have been made such as solar power. I predict that in the upcoming century, many new advances will be made which will benefit the human race enormously.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not produce carbon dioxide or sulphur dioxide and so does not contribute to global warming or acid rain.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today I would like to discuss the topic of nuclear power. Recently, a local energy company has proposed the idea that we build a nuclear power plant in East Pennsboro Area Township. As an adviser to you, the governor of Pennsylvania, I think that this decision should be made and considered vary carefully. In my professional opinion, I think that we should most definitely go forward with this idea and build a the nuclear power plant. There are many reasons why we should pursue this plan and take action but here are just a few reasons why.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Our Energy Future

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Currently, it's clear that there is an immense problem with the prospect of society's energy needs for the future. Such a large dependency on limited fossil fuels are already dampening the world's economy, and following this path will simply ensure a destitute future. However, changes could be made in today's time to prevent such an event from occurring, but it will require many separate state entities to work together and no longer undermine each other's attempts at reform. Some alternatives to fossil fuels include solar, hydro, and wind power, but replacing the resources would only be a small step to protecting the future. A more necessary change would be the reconstruction of electric grids, such as the forty year old grid in the United States that costs the government upwards of $200 billion a year to maintain.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power is one of the world’s most controversial subjects. Nuclear power accidents have left the world unsure over whether we should continue using this energy source. However, the wide range of uses for nuclear power and its efficiency mean that for now nuclear power is here to stay. But what are the implications?…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Power Pros & Cons

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages

    It is essential to appoint a legal team that will work hand in hand with relevant government bodies eg the NPIA, and participate in all deliberations and establish a comprehensive reference portfolio to reflect International safety requirements for the project.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics