Should Student Athletes Be Paid Essay
Should student athletes be paid to play?
People are debating many controversial issues locally and globally. One controversial issue, which is relevant today, is whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. One side argues college athletes should be paid while others argue why they should not. For the NCAA this has been a popular topic. People began to discuss this topic when college athletes started to receive special treatment and compensation from scouters to insure that those players would sign with their team when they went onto the professional league. There are many interviews and articles debating this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid. Weinstock argues that college athletes should …show more content…
Many people think why should college athletes be treated any different that regular college kids? I mean sure they represent the school and are more publicly known but should not all kids be treated the same? If some football player says he doesn’t have enough money to buy new shoes I bet there is another college kid in the same boat. They are college kids; they are supposed to be poor. On the other hand, student athletes do spend an extreme amount of time on athletic functions, which takes away their focus from school. Although the controversy over student athletes being paid is a relatively new idea, the matter could become very controversial if it is left unaddressed. This issue has become more pressing as more and more student athletes are found guilty of taking bribes from professional sports agencies while they are still in college. As I have analyzed these two articles I hope that you will have a better understanding of what I am trying to get across. Both articles were very well set up to persuade the reader on why college athletes should be paid to pay and why they should not. After carefully analyzing both arguments Both Authors used many facts that still
People are debating many controversial issues locally and globally. One controversial issue, which is relevant today, is whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. One side argues college athletes should be paid while others argue why they should not. For the NCAA this has been a popular topic. People began to discuss this topic when college athletes started to receive special treatment and compensation from scouters to insure that those players would sign with their team when they went onto the professional league. There are many interviews and articles debating this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid. Weinstock argues that college athletes should …show more content…
Many people think why should college athletes be treated any different that regular college kids? I mean sure they represent the school and are more publicly known but should not all kids be treated the same? If some football player says he doesn’t have enough money to buy new shoes I bet there is another college kid in the same boat. They are college kids; they are supposed to be poor. On the other hand, student athletes do spend an extreme amount of time on athletic functions, which takes away their focus from school. Although the controversy over student athletes being paid is a relatively new idea, the matter could become very controversial if it is left unaddressed. This issue has become more pressing as more and more student athletes are found guilty of taking bribes from professional sports agencies while they are still in college. As I have analyzed these two articles I hope that you will have a better understanding of what I am trying to get across. Both articles were very well set up to persuade the reader on why college athletes should be paid to pay and why they should not. After carefully analyzing both arguments Both Authors used many facts that still