Preview

Should Student Athletes Be Paid

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2143 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Student Athletes Be Paid
Cody Miller
Combiths
English 1106
20 April 2015
Should Student-Athletes be Paid?
Introduction
In the modern college sports era, the call for student-athletes to be paid has escalated. These athletes are now apart of a nearly billion-dollar industry in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). There are arguments for both sides. Those who believe that the athletes should be paid make the argument that schools and the NCAA are making millions of dollars off these athletes and are not being compensated for their work. Those who believe the student-athletes shouldn’t be paid see that they make upwards of $100,000 a year off scholarships and they are considered amateurs, which means that they cannot be paid.
Objective
My objective was to determine whether college athletes should be paid. I sought to discover as much as possible about the everyday life of college athletes and what they are given in scholarship compared to how much colleges and the National Collegiate Athletic Association make off of student-athletes. In addition, I aimed to examine the amount of athletes that leave college early in order to play sports professionally.
Methods
In order to gain insight into this issue, I searched Virginia Tech’s database for articles and essays pertaining to they payment of collegiate student-athletes. I read each of the articles I chose and ensured that they contained little to no bias. Many of the articles found were from credible sources such as journalists from Forbes, the Arizona Daily Star, and the Economist. Along with these articles, I also found an interview with an economist named Michael Leeds. I aimed to see his point of view and evaluation on whether colleges could afford to pay their athletes.
Results and Discussion There are many reasons why college athletes should be paid. There have been issues in collegiate sports throughout recent history regarding money. Athletes have been leaving school years early in order to begin a future in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whether or not college athletes should get paid has been a controversial question for a while now. Twenty years ago there were only six sports related channels on television. Today, there are over 150. This is mainly due to college athletics, ranging from football, men’s and women’s basketball, volleyball, baseball, and softball. This fact alone would make one question why the profits are not going to the hard-working athletes. They are the ones who make the main event possible. Without the athletes, there would be no game. They are the entertainment that the crowd is paying for and they receive none of the profit.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This debate begins with the depiction of universities making large profits as a result of student athletes. Arguments to pay college athletes often develop due to perceptions of greed and exploitation relating to athletic departments. According to various reports, the football teams at Texas, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, and Penn State, just to name a few big-revenue football schools, each earn between $40 million and $80 million a year in profits (Branch). In an article by Forbes.com columnist, Patrick Rishe, he claims, “The reason why schools are chasing the money associated with college football is so they can better finance the rest of their athletic programs. Programs where – in most cases – all but 2 or 3 sports are losing money” (Rishe). He goes on to explain that the pursuit of profit from football and basketball programs, specifically, help support other programs that operate with a deficit. An example of this is a women’s basketball program in 2010 operating with a deficit of $-1,168,000 while the men’s basketball team had a profit of $788,000 (Rishe).…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pay for Play

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Ever since the National Collegiate Athletic Association was formed in 1905, their role in regulating intercollegiate athletics has involved many different tasks. These tasks include making athletics safe in order to prevent injury, marketing athletic events, regulating and changing rules in order to make college sports more fun for the fans, and enforcing the key principle of college sports: amateurism. Amateurism in college athletics means that athletes are unpaid. As a result, the NCAA has had to deal with deciding how to handle issuing and assigning monetary value of scholarships and grants. However, the NCAA has not had to manage the debate over college athletes getting paid to play. In a day where more and more college athletes are leaving college early to enter the professional leagues it is time to ask a question: Should division-I college athletes get paid? The question is based on the assumption that there is a place for college athletics within a university. The NCAA should be looked at economically because the universities within it generate profits through their athletic departments and operate as businesses by assessing costs, revenues, etc. With that assumption established, because of the market inefficiency and exploitative characteristics of the NCAA, division-I college athletes should get paid in a free-market environment. Division-I college athletes recognize that they are exploited and receiving a scholarship worth less than their market value, so they have no incentive to not cheat and accept illegal payments.…

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After doing some research over a year ago and taking another look at this issue now, the question about paying college athletes has stayed the same. The debate whether to pay college athletes or not arose in the 1980s after Southern Methodist University was caught paying football players for their services. Upon discovery of these infractions, SMU was administered the “death penalty”, including loss of scholarships and no participation in bowl games for five years. The controversy surrounding paying college athletes seems to have risen from this unfortunate circumstance and has been cultivated into a huge social topic today. Following the SMU scandal in the late 1980s the NCAA rewrote their guidebook that describes an athlete’s role in an academic institution. According to the NCAA, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (NCAA.com). Looking at the arguments made by the NCAA, they make a valid point in showing how athletes are “compensated” for their participation in sports. According to the NCAA, “Many [athletes] receive athletics grants-in-aid that can be…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is simply not enough money for each athlete to be paid. The NCAA also has a policy called Title IX, which basically states that if one athlete gets money, every athlete at that university has to get compensated for the same amount. Meaning that a women’s field hockey player will be granted the same amount as a starting quarterback who fills up stadiums. Once people hear that this would be the reality if college athletes were paid, their opinions may change. The NCAA is huge on ameatur status and if they ever paid student athletes, they would break the golden rule that college athletes have been running on since the beginning of college sports. A few hundred dollars a month for each athlete isn’t going to stop any of the illicit activities involved with collegiate athletics because this isn’t about needing material things. What primarily causes improper benefit violations is greed. Student-athletes break rules because they want something they normally could not have, not because they needed something most other students had.…

    • 2491 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Playing a college sport is like a full time job, except the lack of financial benefits. College football and men’s basketball generate revenue of more than $6 billion every year, yet no money goes toward paying the people that make the sports possible (Bagaria). College sports would be non-existent without the devoted athletes who work hard and spend countless hours each and every day. Whether practicing, training, or playing in games, these athletes are involved in their sport all seven days of the week. College athletes put in almost the same amount of work as professional players do, but instead of making millions, rather they are receiving no financial benefits (Bagaria). College athletes deserve to be paid because they sacrifice so much for their team and deserve compensation. Secondly, college athletes not only deserve money because of their devotion, they also need it for their everyday life. During their athletic season, they do not receive any sort of payment for their efforts which would aide them financially and in everyday life (Bagaria). Most scholarships cover cost of housing and textbooks, but leave out basics such as food. Logically athletes need food, but their time and energy is spent on a “job” as an athlete…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The notion of paying college athletes has been an ongoing and controversial debate for student-athletes, coaches, schools, media and most certainly the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Many would argue that playing major college sports is more like a job versus an extracurricular activity. As with the majority of many student athletes, some attend college with the aspiration of becoming professional players thereby college is seen as a means to end. Although student-athletes already receive compensation via full and partial scholarships to participate at the college level, passionate conversations will continue to be a topic of debate because of the enormous revenue generated by college sports.…

    • 3400 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now that the foundation is set, the major issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid can be discussed. As previously mentioned, several people believe players deserve to be compensated for their performance, however; there are a number of reasons why this should not be done, with the weightiest being education. One must not forget the primary objective for a college or university—to provide the students with a quality education that will prepare them to function in the world as self-sustaining individuals, and not professional athletes (Sturgill, Chen). With this being said, players who sign with major college or university sports teams receive this opportunity with little to no cost. Most student athletes receive a five, not four, year scholarship, and some are even given “full rides”, which mean all…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Chait, Jonathan. “Fixing College Sports: Why Paying Student Athletes Won’t Work” New York Magazine Mar.2012. Web. 29 Mar.2012…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The college athletes should be paid there are many reasons that these people think they should be paid and here is why. Many athletes in the past and present have been bringing in attendance and money to the university. Patrick Ewing former NBA Star went to college in Georgetown and he brought in $12,000,000 Profit, i’m pretty sure that this was back when Ewing played back in the ‘70s that should be over $17,000,000 now. A lot of these college athletes such as Andrew Luck, Anthony Davis, Jared Sullinger, Robert Griffin III bring in tons of money for their university, people want to see these young college athletes play. Most of these athletes on big time teams put on amazing performances and bring the university millions of dollars, these athletes get paid a quarter of a million dollars at the most. The big time colleges now such as Kansas, Kentucky, Baylor, Duke, Michigan St all basketball, and Alabama, LSU for football grab millions of dollars each year. The athletes for those teams such as Austin Rivers, Anthony Davis, Thomas Robinson, Jeremy Lamb, Andrew Luck, and many more get scholarships worth $250,000 at the most. Another reason people believe that college athletes should be paid is because some athletes are not getting paid from what others are benefiting from. It is obvious that big companies benefit from unpaid athletes. "The video game business is a multi-billion dollar industry that uses college athletes in games without giving them names or credits"…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    College athletes should be paid because they are not allowed to work and earn money. ("Slaves of Big Time College Sports." USA Today. 2000. Eitzen, D Stanley. 21 Dec. 2009 .) Without that money, many athletes may not be able to afford college or the associated expenses, such as food or rent if they live off campus. This defeats a key goal of college, which is to make students self-sufficient and be able to take care of themselves without their parents or guardians.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many reasons why college athletes should not be paid and one of them is that the athletes are already being compensated in nonmonetary ways. So many times it is overlooked that an athletic scholarship is a major financial package or benefit worth in excess of thirty thousand dollars, as we all know college is expensive. Students at universities/colleges all across the nation would love to have a scholarship and know that their education is being taken care of. In today’s world, one of the greatest things you could have going for yourself is going to school under the umbrella of a full scholarship. College is so expensive; students have to take out loan after loan just to further their education, just at a chance to be successful in life. Knowing that your education is taken care of you is a major…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cohen, B. (2011, September 16). The case for paying college athletes. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904060604576572752351 110850.html…

    • 8737 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, I think that Division 1-A basketball and football players should be getting paid a certain amount on the side for all the good they bring into a school. The proposal that I would like to propose is to pay the students on a per minute basis due to the fact that there are some superstars on a team that play most of the game and other players who do not play at all. I feel as if the better players on a team deserve more than a player who doesn’t play at all. Furthermore, I would pay the players on a $20-$25 dollar per-minute basis. For example, if a star basketball athlete played 30 minutes in a game, he would bring in about 600-750 dollars per game. For the players who receive minimal (6 mins and under) playing time during a game to no playing time at all will receive a minimum of $120. The same would go for the football players at a Division-1A school, as they will be paid on a per-minute basis as well. I have many reasons as to why I feel this proposal is correct route to take and will clearly explain my reasoning in the upcoming paragraphs…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College athletes should get paid for what they do. College athletes aren’t allowed to have a job while in college. And not all college athletes get free education and those are the ones struggling to make it. College athletes bring in a lot of money so they should get some of the money.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays