Preview

should rich countries give aid to poor countries?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
711 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
should rich countries give aid to poor countries?
Shannon
Prof. English 102
10/12/14
Should Richer Countries Help Poorer Countries?
Some people live in a country where every minute of everyday they are hungry, under clothed, and at risk for death because they are poor. Other people wake up and their biggest problem is which shirt to wear with which jeans. Both are scenarios that occur on a daily basis in our countries, some more extreme than others. With that in mind a question of whether or not rich nations have an obligation to help those nations as need arises. Professor of philosophy Peter Singer believes “ It is the responsibility of affluent nations, such as the United States, to assist poor nations in which people are starving to death” (1). I agree with this statement that richer countries should help poor countries for several reasons, richer countries should send educators to poorer countries to teach both children and adults, richer countries should do more charity work for poorer countries, and helping out other countries in need will teach richer countries to be more appreciative for what they have.
The first reason why richer countries such as the United States should assist poorer countries such as countries in Africa is by, sending educators over to 3rd world countries. Education is the most important key to successfulness. By sending educators over to 3rd world countries it can help educate people to be better prepared to prevent disease and to use health services effectively. Educators can teach mothers how to raise healthier children and how to properly care for the elderly and sick. Educators can teach children the basics such as reading and writing and arithmetic. Educators can teach people how to plant and grow their own food. Just by educating a 3rd world country can greatly help with their health and safety and ensure a potential income to those who are more educated then others.
The second reason why richer countries should give aid to poorer countries is because; richer

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 article Famine, Affluence, and Morality, he describes the dire situation that nine million refugees faced in East Bengal in 1971 and urges the wealthier, or affluent, nations to take immediate and long term moral actions to stop the spread of extreme global poverty. With this, he offers a philosophical approach to a new world where, instead of giving to charity, everyone living in these affluent nations ought to make it their duty to give anything of excess to those suffering across the globe and live at the marginal utility, which he would prefer. He also offers a less drastic option of moderate assistance wherein those who are able to assist ought to, as long as it does not create a similar moral dilemma. Critics argue that rewriting the moral scheme from charity to a concrete duty would be far too drastic and would unfairly condemn those who choose to “live the good life”; that too much effort would cause us to become less effective; and finally, that if everyone were in similar positions, then an equal amount would be given by all, but the result would actually be less than if some gave everything they had while others gave nothing.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Year 10 Geography Summary

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    International Aid – assistance developed countries give to developing countries to encourage economic growth and improve living standards…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article, “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, philosopher Peter Singer observes that that there are millions of people around the world who are leading misery lives and suffering death, because of famine , war, lack of shelter, and adequate medical care. He states that although rich nations have contributed great sums of money for these causes, they are still not giving enough in comparison to their Gross National Product (GNP). He points out that many nations only contributes about one percent of their GNP.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The fact that we can afford to provide for ourselves even beyond our basic needs bring an important question. Is it then our duty to provide financial assistance to those who do not have enough to provide for their own basic needs? Peter Singer, in his piece, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” would argue that we ought to prevent bad things from happening without sacrificing something of equal importance. Here is the argument Peter Singer presents to us in standard form:…

    • 1804 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would agree that, “If you can prevent something bad from happening at a comparatively small cost to yourself, you are obligated to do so.” Peter Singer is a philosopher who believes that we have an obligation to help those in need. I agree with his statement from the book Exploring Ethics that, “It is not beyond capacity of the richer nations to give enough assistance to reduce any further suffering to very small proportions.”(Singer pg.244 ) He believes that rich nations can help either as individuals or as a group, to prevent those less fortunate from starvation and reduce their misery without sacrificing anything of comparable significance. He describes comparable significance as “without causing anything else comparably bad to happen,…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” he argues that when people abroad are suffering or dying from lack of food, shelter or medicine, it is wrong for people here to spend money on morally unimportant things rather than giving money to help (Hughes). This means that we have a moral obligation to do what we can to alleviate the stress of poverty abroad if it does not do any harm to us helping them. If we are able to benefit people abroad, we should do so. Food, shelter, and quality healthcare are things that should be seen as basic necessities; therefore, not only do we have a moral obligation to help those abroad in need, but we should also have the want to help those in need. Although Singer asserts this claim, he does identify…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Esaay 3 Mary Paul

    • 701 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Africa happens to be the poorest country with the highest population growth. Since they are so poor they are in deep poverty since because they don’t have sufficient income. Although conflict and drought are certainly a problem, money is a bigger issue. There is many conflict onto in The United States should sent aid or not over to Africa to help them get out of their poverty or should they do it on their own. The United States should not send money because it is no their problem and also pouring money into a leaky bucket will not solve anything.…

    • 701 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is an irrefutable fact that we should help each other. However sometimes help to others poses some danger to either us or others. In Peter Singer's essay "Famine Affluence, and Morality" Peter Singer argues that we ought, morally, to prevent starvation due to famine. Singer begins by saying that assistance has been inadequate as richer countries prioritize development above preventing starvation. Singer then states that "suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad" (404) and assumes that it is uncontroversial enough to be accepted without justification. He then next raises the linked premise that we morally ought to prevent something 'bad' from happening as long as we have the means and it does not entail compromising on anything of 'comparable moral significance', using the analogy of a drowning child and hence assuming the principle _of "_universalizability" (405). As Singer writes, he attempts to justify why he feels that it is within our means to do so without sacrificing anything morally significant, and concludes that we hence morally ought to prevent starvation due to famine.…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will argue that we, citizens in rich countries, have a moral obligation to donate most of our wealth to poor countries. In “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, Singer, a utilitarian, argues, “The way people in relatively rich countries react to a situation like that in Bengal cannot be justified; indeed, the whole way we look at moral issues-our moral conceptual scheme needs to be altered, and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken for granted in our society”. (230).“Suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and, medical care are bad”. (231) One should help others, without sacrificing anything of comparable importance. Giving money to worldwide aid will not cause people to be sacrificing anything of similar…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” written by Peter Singer, Singer’s goal is to convince people that our decisions and actions can prevent other countries from suffering. He suggests that people should do what is morally right by contributing financially to aid those who are starving, rather than purchasing “wants” for those who can afford it. Singer argues his position, provides counter-arguments, and explains his concepts for aiding countries in need.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oscar Romero

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aid is really effective only when it is aligned with recipients' priorities and is predictable, and donors must make sure that aid does not create unreasonable administrative demands on recipients. Low-income countries, for their part, face significant challenges when aid rises.And they have to ensure that the capacity of their public services is not overstretched. They must also make sure that aid flows do not have unintended economic effects—large aid flows can result in an appreciation of a country's currency, making exports less competitive, or causing an increase in…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a world where an increasing amount of emphasis is put on globalization, the Western world has become aware of the plights of those who lead different lives. Extreme levels of poverty, malnourishment, lack of access to basic and lifesaving health care are all daily obstacles for the over one billion people referred to as the world’s ‘absolutely poor.’ With a large amount of the world’s population dying from conditions that have preventable causes, how much should individual countries and global organizations like the United Nations (UN) step in to give much needed aid to countries who struggle? In ‘The Life You Can Save’ by Peter Singer and ‘Domination and Destitution in an Unjust World’ by Ryoa Chung, both philosophers propose two different options on how we can address our obligation to the global poor.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that many people around the world are suffering due to lack of resources within their countries? Some wealthier people and nations decide not to help these less fortunate people as they would rather spend money on frivolous things and think that it’s not their obligation. I believe that man has a moral obligation to help those less fortunate than him, though I believe that it is not morally right to only help those who are less fortunate just to make you feel like a better person.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether in the form of money, training or education. One of the problems wealth nations have with providing aid is it may not get distribute to the people that really need it the most These global governments do not want an educated population for fear of the masses realizing what has been happening to them all their lives. Wealthy nations like to feel like what they are giving is making a difference, but in truth the poor do not see this money. The saying “the rich get richer while the poor get poorer” is an ominous cloud for the poor and it is starting to filter in to the middle class of society. The reality is wealthy countries do not want everyone to be on the same social or economically footing. This would disrupt the hierarchies that have been built up over the decades and the beginning of…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics