Should Law Enforcement Be Required To Have Warrants Essay
To this day, devices such as, smartphones, smart tvs, tablets and smart-cars are evolving making people's personal lives more susceptible to having personal information that is stored to go wide and easy to gain. This has become easier due to the access we that to the internet and the fact that more and more quantities of devices are beginning to require internet. This brings the issue up for law enforcement agencies to question whether the law enforcements should or should not be required for devices to have warrants. Individuals believe that they should not be required to have a warrant to search people’s privacy and information because people tend to put their information out in the open for others to observe and gives away their direct
…show more content…
In the legal information institute website, they bring up one case in Wurie vs the United states in which Brima Wurie was arrested of having 2 packs of cocaine. Officers found the phone and due to his locations of where he had called from and his accounts they traced the address of the suspect back to the home in which they found many more drugs and ammunition. Later, Wurie was convicted of those charges. However, later appealed on the grounds of the 4th amendment saying that the police didn’t have probable cause to search through Wurie’s phone. In the article, it also mentions, “The Court of Appeals noted that information stored on cellular phones is of a kind otherwise off-limits to police searches incident to an arrest.” (Rosales Para. 8). This shows that the court felt that the officer had no reason to go through the phone of the suspect because there wasn’t any need to search for it due to the reason of
In the legal information institute website, they bring up one case in Wurie vs the United states in which Brima Wurie was arrested of having 2 packs of cocaine. Officers found the phone and due to his locations of where he had called from and his accounts they traced the address of the suspect back to the home in which they found many more drugs and ammunition. Later, Wurie was convicted of those charges. However, later appealed on the grounds of the 4th amendment saying that the police didn’t have probable cause to search through Wurie’s phone. In the article, it also mentions, “The Court of Appeals noted that information stored on cellular phones is of a kind otherwise off-limits to police searches incident to an arrest.” (Rosales Para. 8). This shows that the court felt that the officer had no reason to go through the phone of the suspect because there wasn’t any need to search for it due to the reason of