Preview

Should Juveniles Be Sent To Life In Prison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Juveniles Be Sent To Life In Prison
Do you believe that kids who commit heinous crimes should be sent to life in prison regardless of age? The Supreme Court ruled that they shouldn’t because it violated the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Other justices strongly disagree with this claim because they say that anybody that commits heinous crimes should be sent to life in prison even if it’s a juvenile. From my point of view, I believe that juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison.

First, when it comes to the teenage mind, they are different from that of an adult. Of course I’m not the only who says this. Gail Garinger argues that “Young people are biologically different from adults. Brain imaging studies reveal that the regions of the adolescent
…show more content…
There are teens out there that commit heinous crimes because of what they have been through growing up and their house environment. But don’t take my word for it, let’s take a look at Jose. Jose is a fifteen year old who had a difficult childhood with his father being a heroin addict and his mother abandoning him. Instead of punishing him and sending him to life in prison, we should send him to a juvenile system instead to help him out. Paul Thompson argues that “Given this delicate-and-drastic-reshaping of the brain, teens need all the help they can get to steer their development onto the right path”. In prison, it is more likely they will become worse out there in the world because of all the mental and physical pain that they endured. Kids like Jose, need all the help that they can get.
In conclusion, I believe teens should not be sent to life in prison. As I have noted, the Supreme Court said that teens shouldn’t be sent to life in prison because it violated the Eighteenth Amendment on the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Other justices strongly disagree, saying that anybody that commits heinous crimes should be sent to life in prison regardless of age. No matter who said you agree with, there will always be that one kid who will be stuck in a lonely and dark prison cell for the rest of his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many people around the nation have different views on the subject of juvenile justice. Some believe that despite the children's age, they should still be tried as an adult if a serious crime is committed. On the other hand, some believe children should not be tried as adult even if they commit a rather serious crime. I firmly that these children should not be sentenced to life in prison despite the serious crime that they have committed and should have another shot at life when their brain is fully developed.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everyone has the right to a second chance , a chance to make changes , a chance to learn from every mistake that is or was made. In article “Juveniles Don't deserve life sentences” by Gail Garinger postulates , “An overwhelming majority of young offenders grow out of crime.”. Most of the juveniles that make heinous as they grow up, they grow out of the mentality that they had once the crime was committed. Why not give them a chance to show that they have mature and that there mentality isn't the same?. Also Gail Garinger believes that “...it is impossible at that time of sentencing for mental health professionals to predict which youngster will fall within that majority and grow up to be productive, law-abiding citizens and which will…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that juvenile should be incarcerated but not with adults. Juveniles should be put in a detention center with only children. inside this detention center they should still should be learning and trying to change themselves . I believe that if a juvenile committed a crime they should be punish for it but not charge as an adult. You have to keep in mind that they are still children. Some people believe that juveniles should be release rather than incarcerated while others believe the opposite . However both side have some advantages and disadvantage.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you think if a juvenile was to commit a serious crime that they should be tried as an adult and sent to prison? In my opinion, I feel that even though a child has committed a serious crime they should be charged according to their age. If they're not considered as an adult when they have committed the crime they shouldn’t be tried as an adult. There are so many things that can happen to a juvenile while in prison. They won’t have what they need in order to help them…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are multiple reasons that allow individuals to have their own opinions considering children and how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases. Many people today believe that teenagers should not be tried to mandatory life in prisons because their brains are not fully developed to make wise decisions which means they lack common sense. While others believe juveniles should be sentenced to mandatory life in prison because teenagers have plenty of common sense and at their age can identify right from wrong and are also aware of the consequences that they will encounter. I believe juveniles should not be tried to mandatory life in prison for their heinous crimes because they are still underdeveloped and are less mature compared to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Typically, juveniles who display a propensity for committing crime will continue to do so, even as they get older. Their crimes may even become more serious in nature. Therefore, teens that commit heinous crimes should be punished for their obnoxious behavior. In “Juvenile Doesn’t Deserve Life Sentences” by Gail Garinger, he states that “a juvenile doesn’t deserve life in prison because most teens haven’t reached their full maturity”.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults when they commit serious crimes, because the adult prison is too violent with juveniles not mature and fully mentally developed, and children in the adult criminal justice system are more likely to…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My whole life I have heard it said that kids will be forever be kids and don’t know the right between right and wrong. In recent discussion of On Punishment and Teen Killers controversial issue has been whether juveniles should stay in juvenile hall or go to adult prison. Advocates argue that juvenile should stay in juvenile hall not adult prison “juvenile advocates ‘ reliance on the underdevelopment…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Kentucky, and in many other states as well, after the age of 18 you are considered an adult. This is the level of majority. If someone were to commit a crime at this age or older they would be tried as an adult. Children under the age of 18 cannot be sentenced to death or to life without possibility of parole. This is because children are physically incapable of making mature, responsible, well processed decisions. Opinions from one person to the next differ as there are several reasons concerning juveniles how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases (Southerland). The issue may be more of a debate as some people would say that kids do not have enough reasoning and lack common sense. Others, on the other hand, would say that juveniles have plenty of brains and common sense. There are strong reasons as to why juveniles should not be tried as adults and should not be eligible for life without parole.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, there is a national debate about what to do with juveniles in the criminal justice system. This debate is a result changes in practice throughout United States. The United States made it possible to try juveniles as adults in court after the case of Kent vs. the United States in 1966. The change in legislation is relatively new due to the fact that juvenile courts have "for most of the past century, treated youngsters between 7 and 17 not as criminals but as delinquents." The United States choose to treat the kids as delinquents because there was a major focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.…

    • 4926 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before 1980, life without parole was very rarely imposed on children. In today’s society we are consumed with the idea of keeping everyone safe; this has led to a high incarceration rate, especially with minors. In America, currently 2,225 minors are sentenced to life without parole before they turn eighteen. The criminal justice system works on a three strike system, which means you have three minor offenses before you go to jail. Also with the strikes, you are judged on if your crime was of passion or pre-meditated. In the past the issue in judging each situation was that sometimes “children” or minors were charged as adults, due to mandatory minimum sentencing. This is no longer the issue because in 2012, the Supreme Court case (Miller v. Alabama) found mandatory minimum sentencing unconstitutional under the 8th amendment, (which bans cruel and unusual punishments). The problem now is what the Supreme Court forgot to address in there ruling; does this ruling apply to the roughly three hundred adults serving life without parole that were sentenced as juveniles. Adolfo Davis is the leading case that is addressing…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the United States, anyone who is charged for committing a crime before the day of their 18th birthday is considered a juvenile and depending on the severity of the case shall be tried as a juvenile. There are some cases; however, where the juvenile justice system should be harder on the juvenile, but in most cases they should not go to an adult prison. There are most certainly some cases in which the juvenile should face the adult justice system, but for petty instances, a juvenile court will suffice. I find it hard to agree that a juvenile convicted for crimes dealing with drugs, alcohol, traffic violations, etc. should be tried in an adult court to receive punishment; however, I do believe that someone who commits rape, murder, kidnapping, or any other major crimes of the sort should be taken to an adult court. “Old enough to do the crime, old enough to do the time,” is a quote I remember hearing as I was growing up, but I was not taught that it applied to small or minor crimes, but often serious ones involving the harming of another individual. Placing juveniles in adult prisons can cause them to be put in danger, when in reality many of them can be “fixed”…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles are considered juveniles and should be given juvenile punishment unless it's for something inhumane, such as murder. The United States of America has the highest teen murder rate out of every country. The reason is due to guns being easy to get, the amount of violence they see today, and the T.V. programs shown. The 2012 Supreme Court decision to abolish mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murder was not a just decision, because teens should know better. They're old enough to know murder is wrong. Our country should give teens the punishment they deserve for the crime they commit. Murder deserves a life sentence whether a juvenile or grown adult.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you want a person who rapes, murders people or even acts extreme violence to hurt you or a loved one? There are families out there that lose a loved one to an adolescent just because they wanted to see what it's like to kill another human being. These families are the ones that suffer and can never get back what they lost. These teenagers do deserve a sentence of life without parole because they have committed such heinous crimes. I agree with the minority of the Supreme Court Justices who believe in mandatory life without parole because those adolescents broke the law, you must think about the victim’s family, and these teenagers killed another human being and planned to do so.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence of life without parole. The majority of supreme court justices believes that it should not be mandatory to sentence juveniles to life without parole because violates the eighth amendment. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. What's the point of the United States Constitution if its not being used in the supreme court system. Teens should not be charged with a life sentence because teens do not have the same rights as an adult and a teenager's brain is not fully developed until age twenty-nine, additional research has found that adult and teen brains work differently.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays