Preview

Should Hunting Be Allowed?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
381 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Hunting Be Allowed?
Every creature is given a right to be born once, an ability to leave offspring, and a right to die once. This is obvious.
Some creatures have more abilities to survive than others, that is, they can adapt themselves to a variety of environments. Some creatures are destined to live longer lives than others. But basically each creature is equal in that it has been given only one life.

If modern technology, which deprived mankind of ‘animal instinct’, had not been introduced, we would have been currently living in the world where the weak are victims of the strong. The fact is, though, civilisation and culture which were created and developed by human being have destroyed the nature’s rule to a considerable degree. And human being is trying to dominate this world by making our own rules.

As one of those born in a human society and whose common sense was established by human education, I strongly believe that nobody has a right to kill other men. But if it is a universal truth, I would like to say that it is also the case with other animals because we are all given a life equally. However, it was after I got accustomed to the pleasure of eating meat and fish that I learned the animals’ lives are also precious.

Now to the main theme: Should hunting be allowed?
…I am not in a position to answer yes or no to the question. Considering the fact that “the law of the jungle” was contaminated by human law, I think everyone -not only mankind but all the animals- should live their lives peacefully. On the other hand, I literally eat a certain animals and think my life would be less satisfactory if I lost a chance to eat them.

What I am certain is that we should be consistent. If we insist “we should not kill caws”, we should not kill pigs. If we blame someone who eats rabbits, we should not eat duck. Of course everyone has their preference: we can choose what to eat and what to avoid for ourselves. But once we want to dominate other people by making a claim of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal kind are complex subjects, people must reconsider their actions upon animal there something wrong and not, this statement brings rational argument if many of us feel for the animal it will be difficult, since we need to use them in certain ways. Most of animal activist work in preventing cruel thing in animal however there some people begging for more acting.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animals from creation have been an essential integral part of human beings. They have frequently been, either directly or indirectly, used by humans to achieve their needs. Hence they are important part and great asset to humans. These animals do have lives different from that of humans and equally have some similar characteristics with humans like emotional feelings. This very fact puts humans in a difficult position of determining the amount of respect and regard that should be accorded to the animals. Some people agitate that animals should be granted same equal rights as human beings. Inasmuch as I quite agree that animals should be granted some rights in order to be free from cruel treatments by humans, the issue of granting them equal full rights as enjoyed by humans should not come up. An objective review of such factors as tradition, cultural believes, religious, socio-economic, and medical as well as salient natural features that distinguish animals from humans like morality, and ability to…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s important to recognize how much of this goes on because animals play an important role in our world. To make them suffer even more than they already have to is outrageous. “Inhumane Suffering One of the most controversial aspects of hunting is the prospect that an animal may be suffering from a long and painful death,” one article says while talking about this specific issue. It comes to show that animals are greatly affected when hunters kill them. Another article heavily discusses Cecil’s death saying, “the killing of Cecil has sparked an international outcry and a backlash against big game trophy hunting.” Cecil was a lion in Zimbabwe who was the hot topic for his death and is the perfect example of the suffering of animals because he was one of many animals who experienced a death from this…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imagine an animal’s feeling of panic and fear as it is about to be killed by a hunter or the isolation experienced as an animal sits in a laboratory, separated from its family and natural habitat, waiting to be harmed by harsh testing methods. Imagine the frightened state of a mother or father watching their innocent baby being captured. After considering the brutality towards animals in these scenarios, take into consideration the health benefits humans receive from different parts of these animals. Imagine health risks avoided through testing on animals first instead of on humans. Does human benefit justify the harm and killing of animals? Linda Hasselstrom’s essay “The Cow Versus The Animal Rights Activist” and Tom Regan’s “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” argue this question through analysis of the reason for killing animals, the method in which they are killed, and the morality of the killing of animals.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not all animal lives are of equal worth. Human interests may outweigh those of nonhumans.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Importance of Hunting

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Like baseball and apple pie, hunting is an American tradition shared by young and old, rich and poor, regardless of social or economic status. Three out of every ten people are against hunting but for what reasons? What makes them stand out from the seven out of ten that are for hunting? My preference supports hunting for many reasons. Hunting is important because without it there would be animals struggling to survive because of the shortage of the nutrient food they need on a daily basis to stay healthy. It would also cut down the number of damage done to vehicles by animals. It also gets more kids outdoors and involved in agriculture activities which is needed now days. Believe it or not hunting is also a big part of our economy bringing in hundreds of billions of dollars each year.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages.” This quote about animal abuse is from Thomas Edison, an engineer known for his life changing innovations that continue to impact on our world today. Animal abuse is a long-debated problem, often causing the world’s population to split into two sides over the dispute. On one side, are those who say that humans are far superior to animals and other living beings who have been put here solely to feed or entertain us. On the other hand, there are those of us who recognise that these “inferior life forms” should have the same rights as us, and so they deserve the same treatment.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs”, the idea of animal rights is directly and thoroughly supported. Written by Tom Regan, the article presents a several cases of animal cruelty in a seemingly attempt to put the reader in a parallel perspective of each animal in attempt to cause the reader to feel sorry or some form of sympathy for each victim. Regan challenges the methods of hunting, industrial forming, and scientific practices on animals, and, using his pity-the-victim strategy, urges the realization of the rights of animals as a group that stands side by side with the humans in matters pertaining legal rights. In Stephen Rose’s article “Proud to be a Speciesist”, this thought is contradicted directly. Stephen Rose gives an entirely different perspective and idea on the matter of animal rights. In the article, Rose proposes a situation in which the rights, if any exist at all, of mosquitoes and other pests are violated once they’re exterminated by human choice. This situation provides a just argument, being that such pests are killed all the time, yet, if they were ever to attain such rights, concerns questioning their existence would arise and put a complicated spin on the basics of life itself. In “Cow VS Animal Rights Activist”, written by Linda Hasselstrom, a different view is exploited. The…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hunting is an extremely controversial topic in the U.S. There are many people that support hunting and think that it is an acceptable thing to do. There are also many people who are strongly opposed to hunting and think that it should be banned. Both groups of people have very good reasons to support their belief. For example, people that are against hunting…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Rights Theory and Utilitarianism: Relative Normative Guidance, Gary L. Francione, 3 Animal L. 75 (1997) Publish Date: 1997…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history morality has been a topic of intense debate. Innumerable thinkers have devoted immense amounts of time and energy to the formulation of various ethical theories intended to assist humans in their daily lives. These theories set out guidelines which help to determine the rightness or wrongness of any given action and can therefore illuminate which choice would be morally beneficial. And while many of these theories differ substantially, most have at least one common underlying principle, namely that humans deserve to be treated with a certain level of respect. This idea comes from the belief that all humans have interests which are significant enough to be considered, hence no one should impede another from fulfilling their own individual interests. Yet recently a new controversy has emerged at the forefront of ethical debate, the status of animals within our distinctly human-oriented world. For thousands of years man has used animals as nothing more than a mere means, raising and slaughtering them for food, hunting them for food as well as sport, and more recently using them as test subjects to ensure an assortment of products are safe for use by humans. However, as time has passed and the overall level of enlightenment within our societies has increased, many have begun to question these aforementioned practices, maintaining that animals, like humans have interests and therefore should have the ability to seek the satisfaction inherent in attaining those interests. The answer reached in regards to this question varies immensely depending on the specific ethical theory utilized. Some theories dictate that only humans should receive moral consideration, while other wish to extend this consideration towards not only animals but inanimate objects as well. For the purpose of this essay I will examine the issue of animal rights from both a utilitarian and a Kantian perspective. I intend to show that ultimately a utilitarian outlook is…

    • 3188 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tom Regan Animal Rights

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals contain traits that humans acquire into their everyday lives, yet humans find different approaches to make these animals suffer on a day to day basis. Tom Regan, author of Animal Rights, Human Wrongs, describes various situations in which humans hunt animals for pleasure while Stephen Rose, author of Proud to be a Speciesist, illustrates why a speciesist like himself would use animals for research. Tom Regan’s describes his main point as to why humans would want to slaughter such precious animals to have them for resources. On the opposing side of the argument, Stephen Rose’s argument states that animal cruelty cannot be considered wrong because “Many human diseases and disorders are found in other mammals…” (Rose 553). Although Regan…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hunting should not be outlawed. It is still a source of food for people who still live off the land . Hunting can be a very effective method of population control. Hunting is a sport of tradition it offers recreation from everyday life.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since I can remember my dad has always taken me hunting. The beginning of hunting season is like a holiday at my house. I hadn’t gotten anything until this deer season but I love being out hunting for so many other reasons as well. I love the fresh air and watching nature. Such as the little birds and squirrels starting their day. And I believe everyone should get to experience that. Enjoying nature is only one of the many things that hunting provides. There are many things provided by hunting. Such as controlling animal populations, maintaining cultural history, providing a source of food, and providing a way to experience nature.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Humans are trying to live their lives by establishing superiority over the other living species and human kind, too. They may have right when they think that is okay to do. They hunted animals greedly and as Mark Twain mentioned in his essay which is about The Lowest Animal man even said that they were patriots and religious –according to them they were the most one- on the World. However, human kind were wrong that they had misunderstood being the highest animal on the world. Twain was right about his statements about the Morality that makes us more demonic animals. Also Twain has a point about our behaviour.Twain thought that we were killing more animals just for our passion instead of making shift, and he also uttered that we were stocking of vast of foods which is also bad act that can’t be accepted for the highest animals about human behaviours.However Twain was not right about the part of ilnesses. He claimed that we had body parts which were unnecesary and malfucntion.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays