Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Shooting an Elephant

Satisfactory Essays
452 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shooting an Elephant
Tony Earley states “a good story is about the thing, and the other thing. The second thing looks like the first thing, but it’s something else”. Earley’s idea can apply to Orwell’s essay “Shooting an Elephant”. In this scenario, the two “things” are imperialism and the elephant. Orwell clearly and precisely proves Earley’s theory (per say) in his essay.
The title lets the reader know that there is an elephant involved. When the essay is first read, the title does not fit in with what it’s referring to. Imperialism and the elephant are well put into each other, but at the same time, the two are different things. The elephant does not appear until a long introduction about imperialism, hence the two things. They fall into each other, but are not exactly the same. Orwell blends both of the two things together throughout the essay. The transition is actually in paragraph 3. He ends the imperialism statement writing that he detests working for the government in Burma. Everyone in Burma hated him, and what he did as his career. He states that after he was hated, he hated imperialism before. “For at that time I had already made up my mind that imperialism was an evil thing and the sooner I chucked up and got out of it the better” (851). He did not like his job due to working under imperialism. Being a sub-divisional police officer, he needs to keep Burma safe from all violence and danger. After describing how much he hates the imperialism, the raging elephant incident occurs. “It was a tiny incident in itself, but it gave me a better glimpse than I had had before of the real nature of imperialism-the real motives for which despotic governments act” (852). He was called in to see what was wrong with the elephant; the problem was that it was a tamed elephant gone “must”, meaning gone into sexual heat. Orwell states that it was enlightening. I assume he is referring to the work of the elephant was something interesting that he did. As he wrote, it was a tiny incident in itself, but it helped him realized what the true government was and how they worked with issues occurring in the area. In this case, the issue was the elephant. In the conclusion of the life experience, Orwell shoots the elephant; he did not want to look like a fool to all of the people that were watching him. He had the power and authority to do so. The two things, the elephant and imperialism are the two things that Orwell uses. This essay is a perfect example that can be used to support Earley’s statement.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, the story "Shooting an Elephant” was wrote by George Orwell base on his personal experience in Moulmein, in Lower Burma .He served his country, "British Empire as a colonial administrator. The author described the effects on the oppressed Burmese Indians and theirs oppressor British Empire. The internal conflict of British men, his feelings and convictions linked to his pride from of the angry crowd. Shooting an Elephant is more than a personal experience story, is a reflection of the dilemmas of morals standards in real life and the costs that it represent as a human been and his nature as well .…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell sent this essay into New Writing which is highly anti-fascist and anti-imperialistic, which causes the readers to be against ruling over another country by force. This cause George Orwell’s writing style to differ in some aspects. He speaks of how he hates…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell hated the British Empire but sympathized with the Burmans because of how they are being treated by them. After killing the elephant Orwell’s thoughts seemed to be like that of the British. He was selfish in decision to kill the elephant. Orwell did not want to kill the elephant at first but there were many opposing forces that made him do it. He was faced with obligation.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This story begins in Moulmain, in lower Burma. The author speaks about his experiences while he was working as a police officer. In this time, Orwell was a young inexperienced soldier. He was in that place to protect the Queen’s interests. He had to do unethical things that made conflicts himself. When he mentions that he killed an elephant I feel his pangs of conscience. The elephant destroyed a village before it died. The villagers were furious about all the mess and Orwell was called to restore the order before anything, or anyone, was hurt. While this adventure runs, he decided to kill the animal because he thought that was the best. He needed to show solidarity among the villagers as a man of authority.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yup This is IT

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    George Orwell was “disgusted by the inhumanity of colonial rule that he witnessed while stationed in Burma” (2835 Orwell). Using his writing to confess the inner conflict of an imperial police officer, he wrote an autobiographical essay titled Shooting an Elephant. He notes that the Burmese civilians were not allowed to own guns during his stay – a testament of British control over Burmese resources. Feeling “stuck between his hatred of the empire he served and his rage against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make his job impossible” he knew that “the sooner he chucked up the job and got out of it the better” (2844 Orwell). Orwell repressed his emotions because acting out as the only white man would have been foolish. If he betrayed his country, he risked treason. If he sided with the Burmese, he would never fit into their culture. Every white man’s life long struggle in the East was to not be laughed at, so the safest choice for a man like George was to live without action. However, when a sexually aggressive elephant gets loose Orwell is called to take action.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1936, author George Orwell wrote an essay titled “Shooting an Elephant”. In the essay Orwell describes a scene of a British police officer who is stuck between having to shoot an elephant. The story takes place in Burma, India where then, they were under British imperialism. Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. It humiliates the occupied people, reducing them to an inferior status in their own country. Analyzing Orwell’s work, I realize that Orwell feels Imperialism is not good for both the people subject to and the people of the imperial power. The fact that the main character of the story is an officer of the imperial government, but also in opposition to imperialism…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell’s ‘Shooting an Elephant,’ is an essay which takes place in imperial Burma where he is a police officer working on behalf of the British Empire. He is resented by the people who pressures him into shooting an elephant, where he describes himself as being a meaningless puppet in front of the Burmese crowd. Throughout this essay he also delivers his strong personal beliefs towards his hatred of imperialism, despite working for the colonies, he mentions several times of how much he despises it and sees it as ‘evil.’…

    • 865 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shooting An Elephant Greed

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The degrading of the Burmese shows the lack of humanity of the British Empire, no human would ever degrade another human in such a manner. In losing their humanity, the British become mere “absurd puppet[s] pushed to and fro by the will of [others]”; they only have the shape of a human, but they do not have anything inside of them, a heart, morals or otherwise. The downfall of the Empire is expressed in the death of the elephant. The elephant is a metaphor for the empire, as shown by how “the Burmese were quite helpless against it” and by the destruction the elephant causes in the village which is a parallel to the destruction that the empire as a whole wrecked on the country of Burma. By shooting…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is almost a microscopic parallel to how when first Britain came to Burma and established its power through oppression and violence. The author also describes the elephant as a “powerful machinery” (950) which represents the economic foundation of the working Burmese and should not be destroyed. However, the elephant is hated by its people, and is demanded to be killed. During the critical moment during which it falls, the author uses the phrase “powerless to move, yet powerless to die” (951) and words such as “senile” to imply a true feeble state of Imperialism. The author lastly reveals the evil nature of Imperialism through the inner conflict of young Orwell as he faces the moral dilemma of whether or not he should kill the elephant. How young Orwell comes to form his decision is very paradoxical. This is because the officer himself does not want to kill the seemingly innocent elephant when he finds it eating in the field. Also on top of that, Orwell hates the imperialistic power as shown in quote “For at that time I had already made up my mind that Imperialism was an evil thing…and I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British”…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Shooting an Elephant', George Orwell described the onus of serving with the imperial police in Lower Burma, during a time where the British police were hated by the natives. Orwell expressed his views towards the Burmese, saying “Theoretically—and secretly, of course—I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British.” Though he felt that way, they did not feel the same towards him. “As a police officer I was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so.” He hated his job and felt that the sooner he got out, the better. Imperialism was something that he clearly despised, yet he was caught right in the middle of a cycle of oppression. One day, an event occurred that left Orwell battling with a decision between his own moral beliefs, and gaining the approval of the…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Furthermore, if bureaucracy was not enough Orwell's inner turmoil with himself, goes on for many years. He constantly debates with himself about the morals of the British Burmese laws and rules. Orwell was overly concerned about what others though of him. "I often wonder whether any of the others ... soley to avoid looking a fool. (Orwell, P.179)…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Orwell did not get along with the Burmese, nor did he like them because they would make fun of him and enjoyed insulting him while on duty. As for the British Raj, he felt as if the Raj was a cruel and aggressive government ruler and that his hatred towards him was so great that he would “drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest’s guts.” (pg.3). Therefore Orwell being a white man has a great conflict with the Burmese.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A price is payed to save oneself from humiliation, but, being pressured into doing something that one doesn't want to do, makes people feel lost and pushed into a big problem. In the story "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell, he himself goes through a struggle in being the one to shoot an Elephant. In the beginning he knew what he had to avoid of being laughed at from the Burmese people that surrounded him, since he is an imperial policeman. Throughout the story, Orwell uses rhetorical tools such as: metaphors, connotation, and irony to give his readers a better perspective in what's going on in the story. Seeing different forms of writing can help readers see the relationship between these tools and what Orwell is saying about imperialism.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burma was a relatively happy country for most of the nineteenth century. The Burmese fought the British Empire for years to maintain their independence but the superpower didn’t care that their future subjects desired to be free, and finally conquered them in the late 1800’s. England redrew the borders of Burma and made it part of India, even though Burma was a totally separate country with its own cultural and political identity. After years of oppression under a government that ignored their well-being, the Burmese of 1920 were sick of and dying under foreign rule. As a young officer in Moulmein, Burma, George Orwell was “an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so. When a nimble Burman tripped [him on a football field] and the referee (another Burman) looked the other way, the crowd yelled with hideous laughter.” (216). After enduring bullying at the hands of the Burmese, Orwell’s main purpose as an officer was to appear strong and wise in front of the Burmans. This resulted in Orwell violently murdering an elephant to maintain an air of superiority. In sum, because the British government didn’t care about the Burmese, tensions ran high which led to…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the reading, Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell is narrating about his feeling and pressure shooting an elephant. A little about the writer, Orwell, is a British police officer who was born in India. He was hated by large numbers of people in Moulmein, in Lower Burma as the British had colonized Burma.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays