Preview

Shooting an Elephant

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1279 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shooting an Elephant
Joe Portaro
Scott Tenney
Project 2b
"Shooting an elephant"
The main purpose of George Orwell’s story “shooting an elephant” is not to show how or explain how to actually kill an elephant; his work demonstrates how people will react to a imperialistic situation, will they follow the crowd or will they hold their own beliefs and not let others change them. In Orwell’s case he had no intention of killing the elephant but because the crowd behind him was one he wanted, instead of being made fun of all the time, to be appreciated and liked by he made the decision to kill the elephant.
The story starts off explaining Orwell's role as a police officer in the Burmese area and he explains how the Burman's hate him for being British, but hated him more for being a British police officer because he has power over the Burman's. He even gives an example of a community soccer game he played in with the Burman's where they mistreat and make fun of Orwell. He doesn't appreciate the way the Burmese people treat him but he understands why they were doing so. Things change when one day or well gets a call from a sub-inspector from another police station, the man asked George if he would kindly come and help calm a ravage elephant. He takes a gun with them but only for protection for himself; he had no intention of actually killing elephant before he had arrived in the town. The gun in the story represents power, without it Orwell is just as useless as a Burman trying to stop the elephant; but with it he is a strong and courageous person. When Orwell first arrives the elephant had only done minor offenses like flip over a van, and smash a hut. The situation then takes a turn when the elephant picked up a man with this trunk then threw him down into the mud thrusting his large foot on the man’s back shoving his body into the earth. Now Orwell had reasoning for actually shooting the elephant, but still in his mind he did not want to do so, it just seemed like the morally right

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    the double standard and as race played part in the bureaucratic town of Burma. The author unfolds the story that should he not kill the elephant, that had gone mad and killed a coolie, he must forfeit his authority with the local Burmese. As Orwell stated "only time in his life" he was hated, by large number of people because of his position" ...(P. 173)…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    George Orwell describes to us in “Shooting an elephant” the struggle that his character faces when to win the mobs approval and respect when he shoots down an innocent animal and sacrifices what he believes to be right. Orwell is a police officer in Moulmein, during the period of the British occupation of Burma. An escaped elephant gives him the opportunity to prove himself in front of his people and to be able to become a “somebody” on the social scene.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tone : One of the tones that are used in the narrative is Resentment . there is resentment towards the Burman people for making fun of him. “As a police officer I was obvious targeted, the insults hooted after me … got badly on my nerves .” Orwell states the disapproval of the Burman’s mocking showed he was irritated and resented . The other tone is pressure. Orwell was pressured into shooting the elephant.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A price is payed to save oneself from humiliation, but, being pressured into doing something that one doesn't want to do, makes people feel lost and pushed into a big problem. In the story "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell, he himself goes through a struggle in being the one to shoot an Elephant. In the beginning he knew what he had to avoid of being laughed at from the Burmese people that surrounded him, since he is an imperial policeman. Throughout the story, Orwell uses rhetorical tools such as: metaphors, connotation, and irony to give his readers a better perspective in what's going on in the story. Seeing different forms of writing can help readers see the relationship between these tools and what Orwell is saying about imperialism.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, the story "Shooting an Elephant” was wrote by George Orwell base on his personal experience in Moulmein, in Lower Burma .He served his country, "British Empire as a colonial administrator. The author described the effects on the oppressed Burmese Indians and theirs oppressor British Empire. The internal conflict of British men, his feelings and convictions linked to his pride from of the angry crowd. Shooting an Elephant is more than a personal experience story, is a reflection of the dilemmas of morals standards in real life and the costs that it represent as a human been and his nature as well .…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tony Earley states “a good story is about the thing, and the other thing. The second thing looks like the first thing, but it’s something else”. Earley’s idea can apply to Orwell’s essay “Shooting an Elephant”. In this scenario, the two “things” are imperialism and the elephant. Orwell clearly and precisely proves Earley’s theory (per say) in his essay.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main idea of the story “Shooting an Elephant" by Orwell is the effect of the oppressor is not only on the oppressed, but himself. There are several evidences found in the text to support the main idea. First, the author mentioned about the treatment of a European woman gets when she went to bazaars alone. This explained the freedom of security had been taken away. Since European had colonized Burma at that time, there was growing hatred toward European. Freedom to act also been seize when the narrator was expected to shoot an elephant even it’s not in his wiliness. In the story, Orwell had an inner struggle whether to kill the elephant or not. He taught that if the elephant were kept alive, it worth at least a hundred pound. However, if it were shot dead, its tusks only going to worth about five pounds. Moreover, he anthropomorphized the elephant by referring ‘it’ to ‘he’. He said, “It seems to be that it would be murder to shoot him.”(519) Plus, a life had been killed needs to be considered and there would be possibilities that the elephant will escape again, causing damage to the village. These reasons made Orwell to question his decision. Another crucial reasoning that drones the narrator to open fire is his identity as an Imperialist that control fellow Burmese. If he did not kill the elephant as the villagers expected, he would be viewed as a coward. This will further affect efforts to enforce law and coded in Burma. The narrator also described, ‘I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroy,” to show an imperialist had to control or act as what had been expected. These conclude an oppressor would be affected when taking control of others.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This story begins in Moulmain, in lower Burma. The author speaks about his experiences while he was working as a police officer. In this time, Orwell was a young inexperienced soldier. He was in that place to protect the Queen’s interests. He had to do unethical things that made conflicts himself. When he mentions that he killed an elephant I feel his pangs of conscience. The elephant destroyed a village before it died. The villagers were furious about all the mess and Orwell was called to restore the order before anything, or anyone, was hurt. While this adventure runs, he decided to kill the animal because he thought that was the best. He needed to show solidarity among the villagers as a man of authority.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell succeeds greatly in telling one of his remarkable experiences in Burma. While working for the British Empire as a police officer in Burma, he comes across a elephant gone mad that in his judgment he shouldn’t shoot because the handler was on his way and there was no need to kill the expensive piece of property anymore. But in the end he felt that he needed to do a service for the mob of people that had congregated. Orwell wrote this essay 10 or so years after the events that took place in the essay. The British Empire at the time of writing was going through major changes and its imperial power was declining. So he was telling his incredible story as a way of informing the British citizens at the time of exposing the injustices and dark side of imperialism that he felt he had to right. The whole world when he was writing this essay was enduring a economic depression and were facing another possible world war. So it was a dark time not only for the British empire but the whole world.…

    • 796 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Shooting an Elephant” is an essay written by George Orwell and published in 1936 (Orwell 66). Orwell was born June 25, 1903, as Eric Arthur Blair and passed away January 21, 1950, in India (“George Orwell Biography”). Orwell was known for his journals, novels, and essays published about his own political views (“George Orwell Biography”). Orwell traveled to Burma after not doing good enough in school to earn a scholarship and decided to join the imperial police (Orwell 66). While on duty one day, Orwell received a call that a rampaging elephant was on the loose that had killed a man and destroyed a hut (Orwell 67). Once Orwell found the elephant calm in a field he was faced with a decision of whether to kill the elephant or let it be (Orwell 69). Orwell killed the elephant for the safety of himself and out of pressure from the Burmese standing behind him (Orwell 70). While Orwell contemplated shooting the elephant he knew out of the town he was the only one able to have a weapon to kill the elephant (Orwell 67). The Burmese weren’t allowed to have weapons because the British Empire outlawed them to prevent the Burmese from revolting. The British Empire didn’t want the Burmese to over power them and revolt because they wanted to maintain power imperialism. The British Empire needed to keep the Burmese under their control because they needed the resources from the land. The Burmese were helpless against the rampaging elephant because the British Empire needed to maintain dominance over the Burmese.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even though Orwell is “for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British,” he still shoots the elephant, revealing the internal forces that contribute to his behavior. On the surface, Orwell appears to follow the demand of the British. He does as they ask and try to please them, so he can be at peace. However, he is also well aware of the justice for the Burmese that burning inside him. This actually contribute to build up his hate frees for the British.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1936, author George Orwell wrote an essay titled “Shooting an Elephant”. In the essay Orwell describes a scene of a British police officer who is stuck between having to shoot an elephant. The story takes place in Burma, India where then, they were under British imperialism. Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. It humiliates the occupied people, reducing them to an inferior status in their own country. Analyzing Orwell’s work, I realize that Orwell feels Imperialism is not good for both the people subject to and the people of the imperial power. The fact that the main character of the story is an officer of the imperial government, but also in opposition to imperialism…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell writes Shooting an Elephant with his experiences in Burma; so story is in Burma, Myanmar. Both Orwell uses his own experiences in past and he lives in the significant era of British in history, we see high rise at historical background in the story. Orwell prefers to indirect way to express his emotions using symbols. One of the main symbols is an elephant. The elephant symbolizes British Empire. The reason that Orwell chooses the elephant, the empire is powerful like an elephant. When it dies, Orwell makes narrative sentences about the elephant. These sentences help us the elephant is the British Empire.” One could have imagined him thousands of years old. (5)” “He was dying, very slowly and in great agony, but in some world…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Shooting an Elephant', George Orwell described the onus of serving with the imperial police in Lower Burma, during a time where the British police were hated by the natives. Orwell expressed his views towards the Burmese, saying “Theoretically—and secretly, of course—I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British.” Though he felt that way, they did not feel the same towards him. “As a police officer I was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so.” He hated his job and felt that the sooner he got out, the better. Imperialism was something that he clearly despised, yet he was caught right in the middle of a cycle of oppression. One day, an event occurred that left Orwell battling with a decision between his own moral beliefs, and gaining the approval of the…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    George Orwell 's three major books of travel writing--Down and Out in Paris and London (1933), The Road to Wigan Pier (1937), and Homage to Catalonia (1938)--revived the tradition of excursionary literature as social and political analysis. "Into Unknown England" books were initiated by reform-minded Victorian and Edwardian authors. In his three travel books Orwell, who casts himself as a representative of English "lower-upper-middle-class" and as an imaginary social conscience, ventured into the slums of Paris and London, the mining towns of northern England, and the battlefront of the Spanish Civil War, addressing what he saw as a largely conservative and apathetic English readership. Orwell sought to prove that class inequality and the corruption of progressive political ideals were, in his evolving socialist estimation, damning England and the Western world to social division, provincial bigotry, and eventually world war. Yet Orwell 's deep acculturation in traditional middle-class British mores and patriotic sentiments clashed with his sensitivity to class and racial bias. In particular Orwell 's travel essays on Marrakech and Burma (now Myanmar) are ambiguous but important examples of how literature that seeks sympathy with or advocacy for other cultures and groups also demonstrates how the identities of writers, their subjects, and those who read their work are constructed by intercultural exchange. These complications, coupled with the political inconsistencies within Orwell 's worldview over the course of his lifetime, have led to warring interpretations of his legacy. Recent critical debate has focused on Orwell 's reliability as an observer, his idiosyncratic views on socialism, and the degree to which his reputation for fairness, decency, and common sense are attributable to his insistence on empirically verifiable political and moral "truths."…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays