Preview

Shingal: My Developing Country

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
242 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shingal: My Developing Country
My developing nation is called Shingal, a small country depending mostly on farming, oil, and difficult jobs. It depends on other countries' technologies and industries, and its living standard is low, which satisfies the definition of a developing country (Educationalpathways.org). Here is the suggestion to fix country's problems: set up a federal government with the highest supreme leader is the president, elections every four years, and a house of representatives from all sects, parties, and regions. The president can serve only two terms with an exception of up to two years extension if at least 75 percent of the representatives and 50 percent of citizens voted for him/her. This new nation is not involved in wars with other countries, but it is very concerned about its internal and border security. In Shingal, citizens have freedom of speech, demonstration, bear a gun, and vote officials out, like most of the other democratic countries; however, the government starts with totalitarianism first year since the country in not yet ready for democracy. Singal's elections participation is different from other countries because people take a test before they can vote, and the highest their score, the more points they can give to the person they vote for. Roskin (2014) says that countries develop themselves better we develop them (p. 31). This will be true in Shingal as well, and the only interventions from other countries that will be accepted are to protect it from other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Tijerina, Andres and Montgomery, William E. Vol. 2 of Building A Democratic Nation: A…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xlandia Case Study

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Xlandia should have a written constitution as a reference to help explain the details of the new government. This will also limit manipulation of the law, and give a specific process for amendments. This constitution will establish a unitary system because Xlandia has a small population of about 8 million citizens, so local governments aren’t necessary for representation. Xlandia should establish a presidential system because it will work to eliminate corruption in the government. The rights of minorities and individuals should be protected by a written Bill of Rights in the constitution so that the liberties of citizens are guaranteed. While the civilian government should have authority over the military, it should be completely separate from local…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is no secret that some countries are more prosperous and developed than others. Why are some countries poor and there is nothing we can do about it? Is the answer culture, weather, economics, geography, bad policies, or simple bad luck? This is probably the most important question facing the world today, especially for the over three billion people that live in less than $2.50 a day. Economists, political philosophers and political figures have been trying to come up with a solution to fix this problem for hundred of years. The book “Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty” by economists Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson state that while economic institutions are vital to prosperity, it is man-made political institutions that determine if a country is prosperous or poor.1 This is concluded because any economic institution is implemented by the political class that work within the framework of a pre set legal tradition and political system, generally contained in a country’s Constitution and other society foundation documents such as the Declaration of Independence. Therefore, the framework that leads to prosperity (or lack of it) is as follows; the people enact a Constitution based on a core set of founding principles, that sets forth a society’s goals, the political class then implements economic institutions that in turn determine how prosperous a country is. But why do similar theoretical political institutions and legal traditions work so differently in practice? The answer lies in the philosophical foundations of societies.…

    • 2997 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mcgill Poli 227 Full Notes

    • 21575 Words
    • 87 Pages

    developing nations must acquire modern cultural values and create modern political and economic institutions; emphasizes historical process of interrelated social changes Basic Beliefs: - transforming culture is the most crucial step in developing. - judge people with universalistic standards - believe in possibility and desirability of change - value science and technology - think about things outside of immediate sphere/village/family etc - believe every day people can influence politics - transition to democracy can be achieved through: - educational changes - teach modern values - urbanization - will ensure kids attend schools - spread of mass media, communication - spread of modern culture - diffusion of modern ideas from developed nations - need to create more specialized and complex political and economic institutions to support this cultural change - trained bureaucracies - political parties…

    • 21575 Words
    • 87 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wireshark

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Setting up a new government system for Anation is a difficult and slow task. Anotion should be a democratic nation. Since democracy is a nation is which every citizen has an equal say Anation should feel like this governmental system is what works best for them. Federalism would be utilized in this nation. By following the principles of common federalism power would be distributed at regional, national and supranational levels. By setting up a democratic government Anation can make choices that the citizens have a say in. The fact of the matter is that you cannot make everyone happy with any decision that is made. It is just not possible. So by have a democracy and electing officials and voting it gives the fairness or at least the illusion of fairness. I think that for Anation which is a country with several different religious factions this is a system that would work the best.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is important to consider the development of a new system of national elections and the issues that would result. Implementing the direct election would lead to “a host of defects that would make electoral misfires more likely and trigger a series of political and constitutional crises” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). This would be a source of instability moving forward as these changes would require changes to the current system and would need to have the agreements among several states in a subconstitutional or binding form or an amendment to the Constitution ratified by two thirds of the states. The new proposed system “risks creating a presidential election system that is neither workable nor fair” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). While it is argued that the direct election would promote fairness and representation, it would likely be the case that these factors would be reduced in this scenario. It is therefore essential to develop a coherent framework for implementing such a strategy. (Implementing direct…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For a state hosting its first democratic elections, the best type of electoral system would be an open list proportional representation system. This type of electoral system offers many benefits including battling corruption, fair representation of citizen’s interests and an overall more efficient and fair democratic system in regard to voter turnout and gender equality. In years past, many different forms of democracies and democratic voting systems have been tried and tested, and the open list proportional representation system has proved itself as a leading choice in electoral systems around the world. Many current leading state’s in both economic and human rights sector implement the system including Brazil, Italy, Japan, Sweden, and Switzerland. The open list proportional representation system truly pays respect to the origin of the word democracy, by giving the people the power.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Countries such as Hungary wrote new constitutions implementing democracy solely on the platform of knowing that they did not want communism (Graham 154). As a result no concrete decision on how to rule was ever setup and many of these nations still face political upheaval. The main problem which stems problem from a lack of consensus is the ensuing inability to legislate with authority. However, leaders with in each country failed to recognize that when you govern merely through authority you lack any legitimacy (Graham 169). Political scientists who study the failings of post-communist nations developed four ways to help achieve legitimacy: procedure, results, habit, and identity. If these four elements can be forged into a process of electoral change, than legitimacy is a possible…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    High levels of poverty and inequality not only lower the quality of democracy, but may pave the way for the emergence of authoritarian (strict) populists and democratic backsliding. Therefore, addressing the social question, which warrants attention in its own right, is critical to the sustainability and quality of democracy.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Steve Jobs Amazes Me

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For a large nation-state to have a thriving democracy, five key conditions must be met . First among these is an educated electorate and a wise "learned aristocracy." To paraphrase Plato , an educated electorate is essential for a democracy chiefly because it is called upon to entrust candidates for office with power and at times is called upon to make decisions directly. It is imperative that the body politic be informed and not respond to the populist impulses or be lulled into surrendering their freedom by promises of salvation or profit.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How democratic is the UK?

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Firstly, something that is preventing the country from being fully democratic is the First Past the Post voting system. Granted it is an easy, cheap, fast and commonly used system; but it doesn’t produce the most democratic or fair results. It’s easy because all voters have to do is mark what candidate they want, but FPTP voting will inevitably end in a two-party system as the other parties don’t have a chance at winning. The party that wins doesn’t even need to receive the majority of the votes – just more than the other parties. This means that if, for example, a party got 25 per cent of the votes, 75 per cent did NOT want them to win. So there is one of the problems: minority rule. The majority of voters are now unhappy with the outcome, and the unavoidable two-party system will make even more people unhappy as their parties will never get enough votes and will eventually not run anymore. There are also not enough choices (as the number of parties decreased), and what is democracy without a variety of fair choices? The freedom and participation that is promised by a democratic nation doesn’t count for anything if the choices available only please a small percentage of the country. A ‘government by the people’ becomes ‘a government by some of the people’.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Small states means Better Administration – Better Government – Participation of common man in the administration…

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    nder anarchy, uncoordinated competitive theft by "roving bandits" destroys the incentive to invest and produce, leaving little for either the population or the bandits. Both can be better off if a bandit sets himself up as a dictator--{l "stationary bandit" who monopolizes and rationalizes theft in the form of taxes. A secure autocrat has an encompassing interest in his domain that leads him to provide a peaceful order and other public goods that increase productivity. Whenever an autocrat expects a brief tenure, it pays him to confiscate those assets whose tax yield over his tenure is less than their total value. This…

    • 9347 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political Environment

    • 820 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The idea that autocratic regimes have an advantage in economic development was once quite fashionable. The plausibility of such a notion lies in the advantages such regimes were said to have in forcing through development in the long term. An alternative view is that democracy is likely to foster economic development.…

    • 820 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wid Wad and Gad

    • 5016 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Imagine that you could design the political order (e.g., democracy in the United States, Communist Party dominance in China) for a country of your choosing. Where would you start? Who would get to rule? What rules for political life would you choose? Could you make rules that would be fair to everyone? If not, whom would these rules favor and whom would they disadvantage? Would they be rules that even those at the “bottom” of the social order, the poorest and least powerful people, would agree to? What would be the rules for changing the rules? These are difficult questions because to answer them in a meaningful way requires an understanding of why and how different countries of the world are governed differently. With so many choices to make, it is easy to see why the job of designing a constitution would be such a difficult one. It could, however, be made easier. One might start by evaluating the existing possibilities as exemplified by the various forms of government in the states of the world. The state is an organization that possesses sovereignty over a territory and its people. Yet, within our world of states, no two are ruled in exactly the same way. Why should this be the case? Why are societies run, and political orders designed, in so many different ways? What consequences do these differences hold for a people’s well-being? Comparativists (i.e., political scientists who study and compare the politics of different countries) believe that it is possible to provide answers to these questions, and in this book students will begin to understand the craft of comparative politics. Even if it is not possible to design a country as one sees fit, it is…

    • 5016 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays