Preview

Shareholder and Stakeholder Approaches

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1466 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shareholder and Stakeholder Approaches
Abstract

In this report, purposes of corporations are investigated under two different approaches on corporate value maximization: Shareholder Approach and Stakeholder Approach. So, firstly both approaches are defined briefly. Secondly, compare and contrast of shareholder and stakeholder approaches is made.
Keywords: Purpose, Corporation, Value Maximization, Shareholder Approach, Stakeholder Approach.

Shareholder Approach on Value Maximization:
Shareholder approach on value maximization focuses the corporation’s purpose on maximizing the wealth of owners by maximizing the profit while minimizing the importance of the other roles of corporation in the society. The origins of the ideas shaping shareholder theory are more than 200 years old, with roots in Adam Smith’s (1776) The Wealth of Nations. Smith’s three ideas are followed by modern supporters of shareholder approach,
1. The importance of ‘free’ markets;
2. The ‘invisible hand of self-regulation’ and
3. The importance of ‘enlightened self-interest’
Shareholder approach supporters defend the idea that excessive oversight and regulation of industry is unnecessary. Members of the ‘Austrian School’ of economics were early supporters of the shareholder approach. They advocated the idea of ‘leave alone’ capitalism, which focuses on the importance of self-regulation among firms, with limited government intervention.
Shareholder theory in its current form is linked most directly to the ‘Chicago School’ of economics, most notably to Milton Friedman and his colleagues, who have argued for nearly four decades that the overriding purpose of the firm is to maximize shareholder wealth. They believe solving social problems is the responsibility of the state. Friedman believed, in short, that the business of business is business. When firms become involved in social or public policy issues, wealth is diverted to issues outside the core expertise of their managers. This



References: 1. MITSloan Management Review - The Shareholders vs. Stakeholders Debate http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-shareholders-vs-stakeholders-debate/ 2. Michael D. Pfarrer. ‘What is the Purpose of the Firm?: Shareholder and Stakeholder Theories’, Good Business: exercising effective and ethical leadership, 2010, p.86- 92 3. Latha Chari and R. P. Mohanty, Understanding value Creation - The Shareholder Value Perspective

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, maximizing stakeholder value should not only be the sole driver of a firm’s financial management. It has several advantages that could drive a company’s financial management success but it should also be able to strike a balance between stakeholder wealth and other stakeholders’ interests.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of the unique position of shareholders as the owners of the company, satisfying shareholder claims typically receives the greatest attention in many corporate mission statements. However, should managers only pursue the interests of shareholders, while ignoring the claims of other stakeholders. Discuss.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fulfilling its role of increasing shareholders value corporations should also focus on other stakeholders that define their business. Generally corporations should also be interested in its employees, customers, suppliers by reaching to their needs and wants. Apart from these two crucial corporation’s stakeholders are…

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Agency Problem

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The preliminary and primary goal of a company is to maximize its firm value, in other words, to maximize the shareholders’ wealth. As a good instrument tool of measuring the firm value or the operation condition of a company, the share price indicates the stock market value of the company’s shares. Shareholders always expect to maximize the share price by corporate governance, however, managers in company always link their attitude to the their own interest, and they would not to try their best to achieve shareholder’s goal. Due to different interests in shareholders and managers, the conflicts always exist between them. An agency problem occurs when the interests of stockholders, the board of directors, and/or the management of the company are not perfectly aligned or when these entities conflict.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the introduction of the first public company by Francis Cabot Lowell in 1814, the principal – agent conflict between stockholders and managers has existed. The Greed Cycle offers an exploration and analysis of the agency problems that exist between stockholders and managers as well as some of the mechanisms that have been used to reduce these problems. The following review will highlight the changing nature of the goal of the corporation, the relationship between agency problems and the goal of shareholder wealth maximization, successful and unsuccessful ways in which agency problems between managers and owners have been addressed, the relationship between agency conflicts and options given to managers, and thoughts regarding the ultimate goal of the corporation.…

    • 867 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stakeholders: Large Firms

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Yvon Pesqueux, Salma Damak-Ayadi, (2005),"Stakeholder theory in perspective", Corporate Governance, Vol. 5 Iss: 2 pp. 5 - 21…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Freeman, E. F. (n.d.). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In A. Allhoff & A. Vaidya (Eds.),Business in Ethical Focus: An Anthology (pp. 69-78). Peterborough: Broadview.…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lazonick, W. and O’Sullivan, M. (2000) “Maximizing shareholder value : A new ideology for corporate governance.” Economy and society, 29(1), 13-35…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milton Friedman and others have argued that a corporation 's purpose is to maximize returns to its shareholders, and that since only people can have social responsibilities, corporations are only responsible to their shareholders and not to society as a whole. They assert that corporations have no other obligation to society. (Freeman,…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fligstein and Shin’s (2007) article explores the cause-effect relationship between shareholder value strategies and profitability. I believe, however, that we can go deeper and say that this relationship illustrates human nature itself and how we, as stakeholders or managers, are actually mostly the problem if we view shareholder value maximization as the path to profitability and hence success.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Strategic Stakeholder Management A stakeholder is any individual, group, or organization that has an interest or concern or may be impacted as a result of an organization’s activities, objectives, policies, or products. Strong relationships between an organization and its stakeholders are critical to a company’s success. To effectively manage stakeholder relationships, an organization must understand the nature and composition of its stakeholder community and how stakeholder power and interest levels can influence strategy decisions and ultimately business outcomes.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monsanto

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is never a good thing when managers make the mistake of putting the claims of shareholders in front of all other claims. It is true that a business corporation should try to maximize the return associated with holding its stock but at the end of the day, managers might end up obsessing on short term goals and plunge the company’s long term future. Furthermore, the managers might take actions that not only run counter to the interests of other important stakeholder groups, but also are not in the best long-term interests of shareholders themselves.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the shareholder theory predicates that promote capital managers to shareholders, the company's funds should be spent only in the manner authorized by the shareholder. Moreover, stakeholder theory is that the responsibility of the managers…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stakeholder Theory

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Stakeholder Theory is defined as having three dimensions. The first dimension is that the stakeholders must contribute valued resources to the firm. The second dimension is how the stakeholders use these resources and the risks involved that could affect the success or failure of the firm and the relationship with that firm if it is terminated. The third dimension deals with the power that the stakeholders have within the firm. While one can be considered a stakeholder by possessing one of these dimensions, it is essential to possess all three dimensions to be considered a true definitive stakeholder. This theory differs from the shareholder theory in that a shareholders primary duty is to maximize returns and deal with no other aspects of the company. Basically advocating profitability by any means necessary bringing in a very moral issue. Many believe the stakeholder theory seems to disregard the interests of the shareholders', however this point is misinterpreted because by using the stakeholder theory to ensure long-term sustainability of that company in itself takes account of the interests of the shareholders. Stakeholders' theory focuses on management decision-making whereas shareholder theory is more financially based decision-making.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the non-Anglo-American markets, controlling shareholders also strive to maximize long-term returns to equity. However, they are more constrained by powerful other stakeholders. In particular, labor unions are more powerful than in Anglo-American markets. Governments interfere more in the marketplace to protect important stakeholder groups, such as local communities, the environment, and employment. Banks and other financial institutions are more important creditors than securities markets. This model has been labeled the stakeholder capitalism model (SCM) (Moffett, pg. 32). The SCM model weighs more in the favor of the long-term investor than those investors that are transient. The SCM model assumes that total risk, that is, operating and financial risk, does count. It is a specific-corporate objective to generate growing earnings and dividends over the long run with as much certainty as possible, given the firm’s mission statement and goals. Risk is measured more by product market variability than by short-term variation in earnings and share price (Moffett).…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays