Preview

Shakespeare the Historian: Richard Ii

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2528 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shakespeare the Historian: Richard Ii
Shakespeare the Historian: Richard II and the War of the Roses

Who was Richard II?

Born: 1367
Reign: 1377 – 1399 (deposed)
Death: 1400 (murdered)

Historical Context surrounding Richard II
Richard II was born in 1367, in Bordeaux which was then part of the English principality of Aquitaine. He was the second son of Edward, the Black prince, and his wife Joan of Kent. Edward was in line to the throne, after his father Edward III. The Black Prince was a distinguished military leader like his father, bringing about victories at in the Hundred Year’s War against France. However, Edward died in 1376, and as his first son had died in 1371, Richard was therefore the heir to the throne. Richard ascended to the throne in 1377 at the age of ten.
Richard, at the age of ten, was not prepared to be king. It was usual for such a young monarch to have a regent rule in their place, an older relative. However, it was feared that John of Gaunt – Richard’s uncle – would try to usurp his throne, so instead of a single regent a council of noblemen were put in place to rule on Richard’s behalf.
(Turn to page 178 of Year 7 History textbook)
1381 Peasant’s Revolt – a poll tax was imposed on every person over the age of 15. This resulted in a revolt across Essex and Kent, led by Wat Tyler. The rebels, numbering 100,000 men marched on London, pillaging houses as they went. They burnt the records of their bondage and put to death lawyers, justices and other officials. The king met the men in Essex and granted their demands, which were: abolition of villeinage; reduction of rent to fourpence an acre; free access to all fairs and markets; a general pardon. The men dispersed. Meanwhile some of the men were still rampaging about London, so the king met them at Smithfield where Tyler was killed. Their demands were met and they also dispersed. Once the rioting had calmed down Richard quickly revoked the Charter of Freedom and Pardon.
1388 Merciless or Wonderful Parliament – the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 22nd August 1485, King Richard III lost the Battle of Bosworth to Henry Tudor. One of the main reasons for him losing was due to his unpopularity with the people and his nobles. Richard was disliked by many of his nobles because he gave power to nobles from the north, which he knew, annoying the nobility in the south of England. This meant that in the battle he had little support, and some of his nobles, such as the Stanley’s fought for Henry. Richard was also disliked by the people of England. He seized the crown in 1483, and rumours spread that he killed his two nephews. This made him disliked, and few people supported him.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard tried to end the war of the roses and placate the Lancastrians by honouring Henry VI through a ceremonious reburial, and by trying to build bridges with the Woodvilles by persuading Elizabeth out of protective sanctuary and to attend court whilst paying her an annuity (Elizabeth was born into a Lancastrian family and did marry a minor Lancastrian noble before marrying the Yorkist king). He tried to end the war of the roses because they were unpopular with the kingdom and the nobles. This is a clear demonstration of how he could have been a great king. This is because he is trying to win over defected supporters and gain trust, popularity and an affinity with as many people as possible. It also shows how he tried to gain affinity with the nobility by gaining trust and showing respect to the Lancastrian history.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This, as well as the subsequent measures implemented to collect that tax, have been recognised as catalytic to the uprising (Rampton, p.50). The peasants refusal to appear on records demonstrated that a wide-scale tax evasion was taking place and commissioners were sent out to districts to enforce payment (Rampton, 51). At the end of May 1381, attempts to enforce payment of the third poll by the royal offical John Bampton tax led to riots in Essex which quickly spread to Kent (Oxford, John Ball). These attempts _____ As a result, the rise of the Peasants’ revolt represented a serious loss of public confidence in the central administrative and legal departments of the English government (Ormord, p.2). Another major impact on the insurgence of the Peasants’ Revolt was the influence of religious and ideological movements, specifically the Lollard movement and John…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He wanted to become as powerful as possible despite the competition he had. So when his oldest brother passed, Richard was the last one standing. The only living male sibling of the king, so the courts had no other choice but to anoint Richard as the next king. It was a dream come true for Richard, and it couldn’t have gone any more smoothly. However, what’s the point of having power if you won’t keep it? The boys were still young, so they weren’t an immediate threat to Richard, but perhaps the thrill of it all and knowing the fact they could succeed him in the future lead him to ambitiously kill off his remaining competition. It would have been no burden on his shoulders anyway, since Richard saw them only as the worst parts of his favorite…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play King Henry IV part 1, Shakespeare reflects both sides of Prince Harry, and his reformation that guide him to be a great King. In the beginning King Henry states; “When honor speaks, it speaks about Hotspur. I can only see my own son, Harry, and his reputation for wildness and dishonor.” Harry is known as a disgrace, his days consist in being a thief and not behaving as an honorable prince. He accepts himself as a disaster; and no one thinks that his capacity and attitude can lead him to be a great man with a clever plan. By the middle of the play he exposes his great secret; “I’ll be so wild, I’ll make wildness an art form, then redeem myself when the world least expects me to.” His elaborate plans consist in exhibiting the worst…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Deposition of Richard II, it is obvious that the English king was disliked by all. A list of his grievances was drawn up, citing all of his poor choices as king and the reasons why he should be dethroned. The number one cause of the hatred of him was “his evil rule, that is, he has given the goods and possession…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justinian Plague Analysis

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It was a significant contributor to the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381, the largest revolt Medieval England had ever seen or was to see again. There was a severe population drop, and manual labor was much more difficult to find. The law said that peasants could not leave their home village unless their lord allowed it, but it was ignored by desperate lords in other villages, who openly supported and encouraged peasants to leave their home villages and come work for them. When peasants left their home villages, their original lords refused to let them return. Peasants demanded higher wages, since they knew that lords were desperate for work. A statute was passed, making it so peasants could not be paid more than they had been paid in 1346 (before the Black Death), and could not leave their village under any circumstances. This riled up the peasants and they grew very wrathful, leading to the revolt in…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At just age 14 he became the duke of Aquitaine. Richard was rebellious and favoured his mother over his father. He and his brothers came together to protest against his father for giving their youngest brother three castles. This lasted for about a year and after their relationship was never the same. Richard became the King of England through inheritance, like his other titles. Richard did what he wanted and stayed where he wanted; however, while he did not care for much for most he cared greatly for his mother. When his mother was locked up from his father's causing he came to her rescue, earning his nickname Richard the Lionheart. Another important fact to note is that Richard was not the biggest fan of England and left no heirs of his own to succeed him in the throne, causing the throne to go to his brother…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analogous to Hal, Richard implements the same strategy when he utters, “From all the impure blots and stains thereof, / For god doth know, and you may partly see, / How far I am from the desire of this” (4.1.234-236). As Richard implies that he doesn’t desire the throne, his transformation into a king will seem more honorable since the people desired his ascent. This is apparent when immediately following his statement, Buckingham proclaims, “Then I salute you with this royal title - / Long Live King Richard, England’s worthy king!” (4.1.239-240). Although both Hal and Richard ascend politically in similar fashions, Hal is driven by a rise to glory for glory’s sake, and Richard is driven by greed for himself. These motivations ultimately drive each character into becoming good and…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He had, with the help of Wycliffe and John Ball, galvanized thousands of peasants to rise up against the authorities that constricted them to their land unjustly, and temporarily reduced the king into giving concessions. In history, the impact of Tyler was said by Norman Cohn to be 'underestimated. ' He states that 'Tyler 's ability to solely begin an organised uprising is outstanding. ' This is clearly substantial evidence that he was a key individual in the rebellion of Late Medieval Europe. His support dramatically increased as he entered London, despite the fact that he lost discipline of the mob. His demands for an abolition of serfdom, tithes and poll tax were said by Cohn to be 'exceedingly crucial in gaining the support of the workers of London, and thus transferring power from the church and parliament to the people. ' His ideas were supported by Ball 's use of religion to urge equality in society, a view similar to modern day communism. Although Tyler was successful in causing the uprising in the first place, Cohn is wrong in describing him as crucial and influential due to his failure at retaining control of the mob and being tricked by Richard II, which led to his death. Ultimately this caused minimal change to how England was run, as nearly all of the promises made by the king to the mob were overturned. This points towards the fact that Tyler…

    • 4136 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare portrayed John of Gaunt and King Richard III the way he did because of the political issues and constraints presented to him during his time period. When writing Queen Margaret of Anjou’s role in Richard III, however, Shakespeare degraded her political influence and public figure because of the social norms and superstitions that confined women under during the Elizabethan era. Yet, according to modern-day historian Jacob Abbott, there was more to Margaret than Shakespeare told his readers. Abbott defends the Queen and says, “Margaret was not a victim, but a heroine; not a traditional heroine of romance and fiction, but of a stern and terrible reality” (Abbott).…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1995 film Richard III follows the plot and script of the original play very closely, but is quite different in its setting. While the play takes place in the 1400s, this film is set in the 1930s. As such, many differences in aesthetic are to be assumed. The characters wear modern clothing and technology is up to date: Men wear suits and ties, women wear modern dresses; rather than horses people rely on cars, trains and planes for transportation; rather than lute players people listen to phonographs; rather than battles being fought with lances, bow and arrows and swords on horseback, soldiers are armed with guns and command tanks. Strangely enough, despite the presence of a Prime Minister in the film there still exists a royal rule, implying that the film is set in a Fascist state. In fact, the garments of the king and his men are reminiscent of Nazi general uniforms.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texts are often a reflection of the society they embody: through awareness of context deeper levels of understanding can be developed and explored. By a comparative study of texts parallels in context can be established and evaluated, with the alternate visual mediums key in enhancing the audience experience. Al Pacino’s “Looking for Richard,” (1996) provides a more coherent view of William Shakespeare’s “Richard III,” (1592), using similarities between texts to accommodate a modern audience. Both texts represent common themes of war, demonstrating the inherent evil of mankind through characterisation, with respective societal influence affecting their portrayal. Shakespeare’s text strongly portrays the presence of propaganda in society, an influence still present in the context of 1996. Through the employment of the visual medium, Al Pacino is capable of displaying these influences to a postmodern audience, demonstrating the similarities in context and purpose.…

    • 962 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's play, it is easily seen that power is central as the whole situation that the characters find themselves in is due to a struggle for power, a fight for the throne. The civil war between the houses of York and Lancasters has been won ‘by this son of York’, King Edward, Richard’s brother. In the opening soliloquy Richard says ‘…since I cannot prove a lover/ To entertain these fair well-spoken days, / I am determined to prove a villain’. It is not only Richard who thirsts for power, but also Buckingham and the Woodvilles. Buckingham chooses to politically align himself with Richard for his gain, apparent when he asks Richard for the promised earldom of Hereford. He ignores Margaret’s warnings about Richard and continues to support him. He also enjoys acting almost as much as Richard, seen in Act 3 scene 5 when he tells Richard he can ‘counterfeit the deep tragedian’, and ‘I will play the orator’…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays