Shakespeare (Poem) by Matthew Arnold
Matthew Arnold (1822-1888), the Victorian poet and critic, was 'the first modern critic' [1], and could be called 'the critic's critic', being a champion not only of great poetry, but of literary criticism itself. The purpose of literary criticism, in his view, was 'to know the best that is known and thought in the world, and by in its turn making this known, to create a current of true and fresh ideas', and he has influenced a whole school of critics including new critics such as T. S. Eliot, F. R. Leavis, and Allen Tate. He was the founder of the sociological school of criticism, and through his touchstone method introduced scientific objectivity to critical evaluation by providing comparison and analysis as the two primary tools of criticism.
Arnold's evaluations of the Romantic poets such as Wordsworth, Byron, Shelley, and Keats are landmarks in descriptive criticism, and as a poet-critic he occupies an eminent position in the rich galaxy of poet-critics of English literature.
T. S. Eliot praised Arnold's objective approach to critical evaluation, particularly his tools of comparison and analysis, and Allen Tate in his essay Tension in Poetry imitates Arnold's touchstone method to discover 'tension', or the proper balance between connotation and denotation, in poetry. These new critics have come a long way from the Romantic approach to poetry, and this change in attitude could be attributed to Arnold, who comes midway between the two schools.
Mathew Arnold expresses great revenernce for Shakespeare in this poem. He is completely bowled over by Shakespeare and says that Shakespeare is the most superior with respect to contemporary playwrights. He is beyond comparison in terms of the knowledge and also the expression of this knowledge through his works. He is also as obscure as life itself and like a puzzle when people try to understand him, all they get back is his smile. People search for knowledge (loftiest hill) but their knowledge cannot match
Arnold's evaluations of the Romantic poets such as Wordsworth, Byron, Shelley, and Keats are landmarks in descriptive criticism, and as a poet-critic he occupies an eminent position in the rich galaxy of poet-critics of English literature.
T. S. Eliot praised Arnold's objective approach to critical evaluation, particularly his tools of comparison and analysis, and Allen Tate in his essay Tension in Poetry imitates Arnold's touchstone method to discover 'tension', or the proper balance between connotation and denotation, in poetry. These new critics have come a long way from the Romantic approach to poetry, and this change in attitude could be attributed to Arnold, who comes midway between the two schools.
Mathew Arnold expresses great revenernce for Shakespeare in this poem. He is completely bowled over by Shakespeare and says that Shakespeare is the most superior with respect to contemporary playwrights. He is beyond comparison in terms of the knowledge and also the expression of this knowledge through his works. He is also as obscure as life itself and like a puzzle when people try to understand him, all they get back is his smile. People search for knowledge (loftiest hill) but their knowledge cannot match