Preview

Shakespeare - Henry Iv Part 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
842 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shakespeare - Henry Iv Part 1
SHAKESPEARE:
Shakespeare successfully establishes the nature of honour in his historical living production Henry IV Part 1. The play embarks around the subject of honorable rebellion, primarily through the duality of the two characters of Prince Harry (Hal) and King Henry IV as well as Hotspur and Falstaff. Through different concepts of the major universal theme of honour displayed by various protagonists, the interrelated ideas of power and responsibility are also made evident. As this play unfolds, the importance of the soliloquy’s, issues and conflicts are highlighted. Honour is encapsulated from success on the battlefield to dealing with noble and respectable behaviour. Shakespeare captures the essence of a historical tragedy and formulates a lesson on the key principle of Honour, Power and Responsibility.
(Act 1 Scene 1) Honour is a reflection of an individual’s personality and conscience. This universal theme unfolds from the perspective of various characters. The idea of honour ranges from being parallel with an individual's courage on the battlefield to a mere "word" used in an attempt to elevate the physical horrors of conflict to something more lofty and elusive. From Henry IV Part 1's opening, Hotspur is praised as the very embodiment of honour because of his military ability, while Prince Hal is marked by the "stain" of "dishonour" revealing Hotspur to seem more like a “prince”. This allows the play to consider the kind of behaviour that makes one a good leader and a strong king. In this way, honour is evident to be closely linked with "Power." Honour as well as Power are necessary attributes for all successful leaders and monarchs; a thin concept that men use in a useless attempt to elevate the horrible reality of warfare to something moral. Hotspur’s courage on the battlefield is seen to have two interrelated meanings. According to King Henry, Hotspur’s courageous actions to capture the prisoners are seen as ‘honourable’. Another way that Hotspur’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Honor In Hamlet Essay

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By definition, honor is the “quality of knowing and doing what is morally right” (Merriam-Webster). In Hamlet, three sons of three murdered fathers - Hamlet, Fortinbras, Laertes and Hamlet - are subject to the obligation of honoring their fathers’ deaths. Despite all three of these characters having to seek revenge for the deaths of their fathers through the murder of another person, the kinds of honor that these three sons are fulfilling are unique. Hamlet is avenging the murder of his father by his uncle, Laertes is avenging the muder of his father by Hamlet, and Fortinbras is avenging the death of his father, by Hamlet’s…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Essay

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In using the conventions of the revenge tragedy genre, expectations are created for an audience who understand the conflict that looms under Claudius’s leadership unless Hamlet revenges his father’s ‘most foul and unnatural murder’. Yet Hamlet is conflicted over the moral dilemma that confronts him, expressing this through his Judeo Christian perspective of ‘O cursed spite that ever I was born to set it right’. His powerful use of soliloquy throughout the play explores the paradigm shift between Renaissance and Judeo-Christian ideas on life and life after death. ‘To be or not to be...’ asks Hamlet, reflecting the philosophical existential concerns of this context and supporting the plays longevity for these paramount concerns remain relevant to every context. Here Shakespeare has successfully mirrored the ferment and change in his society, whilst modern directors mirror theirs in ways that reflect their values and beliefs. It is for this reason that Shakespeare’s work is described as ‘not of an age, but for all time’ (Ben Johnson).…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play King Henry IV part 1, Shakespeare reflects both sides of Prince Harry, and his reformation that guide him to be a great King. In the beginning King Henry states; “When honor speaks, it speaks about Hotspur. I can only see my own son, Harry, and his reputation for wildness and dishonor.” Harry is known as a disgrace, his days consist in being a thief and not behaving as an honorable prince. He accepts himself as a disaster; and no one thinks that his capacity and attitude can lead him to be a great man with a clever plan. By the middle of the play he exposes his great secret; “I’ll be so wild, I’ll make wildness an art form, then redeem myself when the world least expects me to.” His elaborate plans consist in exhibiting the worst…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s focus is characterisation and valuing honour and loyalty to the monarch in the context of performance…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hotspur's Views On Honor

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Honor is commonly associated with people in places of high worthiness and respect, in Henry IV – Part 1 we aren’t given a set definition of what they view honor to be. Instead, honor has different meanings to different characters in the play. Shakespeare portrays his views on honor through the characters of Hotspur, Falstaff, and Hal. Since these characters have such contrasting views on honor it creates conflict for them with other individuals because they aren’t able to see eye to eye on their opposing actions.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nutt1

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "Henry V." Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 107. Detroit: Gale, 2007. Literature Resource Center. Web. 9 Feb. 2015…

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare informs the reader of the modifications needed in society to prevent capitalism from overthrowing the traditional aristocratic ways. Through Goneril and Regan, the dangers of bourgeoisies and proteltarists are evident and the negative effects they cause. With the differing social orders, lineage becomes trivial. Blood no longer matters and wealth depends heavily on market exchange. Scholars highlight the difficulties and dangers of utopian concepts, especially when they are centered on bourse. He discusses the many social climbers who attempt to behave badly to gain status from the new capitalist power. The conflict between the idea of human liberty and the traditional order is resolved in the play by transforming the king into an item of pathos. By “humanising” the king, Shakespeare is able to fuse together the two ideas regarding absolutist authority and individual…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue’s significance in society has changed over time and its relevance can be used to contrast differing social and cultural contexts. The prescribed non-fiction text, “The Prince,” written by Niccolo Machiavelli in 1532, is a didactic explanation of the political struggles of Renaissance Italy. Similarly, William Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar,” composed in 1599, depicts the historical events surrounding Julius Caesar’s assassination. The ideas of manipulation and fate versus free will are presented through literary devices in “The Prince” and dramatised staging features in Shakespeare’s play. While virtue is presented as a key theme in both texts, its portrayal differs due to the context in which it was set or written.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the text William Shakespeare wrote originally was written in the we see Henry as the ideal and moral monarch but Kenneth Branagh’s screen explains otherwise. In the screenplay Henry is conscience about “fall of blood.” (1.2.25) And in act 1 we…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The play by William Shakespeare, Henry the IV, is a dramatic portrayal of the various relationships and emotions inherent within the father-son relationship especially emphasized between Harry’s surrogate-like father Falstaff, and his biological father King Henry. As the play begins the relationship between father and son is emphasized by the character of King Henry the Fourth and his rebellious son Prince of Wales; Harry or Hal.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Role Of Honor In Macbeth

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the play Macbeth, William Shakespeare uses diction to convey a change in not only his characters but their environments and other character’s points of view. The varying uses of honor allow Shakespeare to introduce motifs about Macbeth’s changing character throughout the play. In the start of the play, Macbeth is an innocent thane, yet by the end, he is a merciless king who becomes obsessed with his possible power. The honor represents his valiancy at first even though by the end, honor becomes worthless because Macbeth has abused it and has lost any trust from his people.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hotspur's Virtue

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prince Hal became stressed about becoming a son that his father could be proud of, so he took after Hotspur, and tried to achieve honor through fighting as well. When he was speaking to his father, he spoke of Hotspur very highly when he said, “I do not think a braver gentleman, / More active-valiant, or more valiant-young, / More daring or more bold, is now alive,”(5.1.90-92). The tone that he took when referring to his supposed enemy was full of pure lust. Hal knew that Hotspur, although the enemy, had the exact drive that his father wanted him to have as the prince, so Hal took Hotspur’s hunger for honor and strived for it as well. Not only did Hal want to be as honorable as Hotspur in order to make his father proud, but he also wanted to kill Hotspur, to in some twisted way make Hotspur’s honor his own.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet, You Crazy

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The early England’s notion of honor described by Terry is promise. Men were considered honorable simply by right of birth and involved forever loyalty to one’s lord. Honor simply gave its holder dignity and status of a true honorable man, and this was categorized as the most important feature in a man. However during the Renaissance period, there was a major shift in the beliefs of honor. Terry said, “One of the most complex changes in the code of honor was a move from an external code to an internalized concept of what it is to be an honorable man.” (Terry 1071) The involvement of blood and lineage stopped coming in to play and in every situation, men behaved to please both “their state and their god.” (1071) The modern code of honor is heavily affected by religious affair and needs to satisfy god and one’s loyalty. Hamlet, the protagonist of the play is caught in an ambiguous world, the pressure between the old and the new code of honor leads him to become mad and think of…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry V is displayed as an honest and noble character. Shakespeare explores this nature of integrity clearly by displaying the audience with Henry’s innermost thoughts in addition to presenting him with situations, which test his virtue. Shakespeare continually contrasts the Dauphin with Henry and therefore effectively brings to the audience’s attention the admirable characteristics of Henry. Throughout the play Henry puts the needs of his kingdom above his own which proves his patriotism and shows that he possesses the qualities of a good King. This in turn relates to the chain of being because every time he gives an order he refers to God and Henry’s people refer to him. Through the use of literary devices such as soliloquies, juxtapositions, motifs and the strong use of central themes Shakespeare emphasises the integrity of Henry V.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to F. Scott Fitzgerald, "The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function." Indeed, very few people have this quality, the playwright William Shakespeare being one of them. In many of his plays, "Henry IV, Part One" among them, Shakespeare juxtaposes different worldviews, ideologies, and even environments. His characters usually provide a clear example of a split among them in one of many perspectives. One of his characters in "Henry IV"—Falstaff—is first seen as an endearing, uproariously funny scoundrel and later reveals himself more of a lowlife with his view of honor—he seems to believe it when he says that honor is merely "air" and "a word." Henry Percy (a.k.a. Hotspur), another character in the same play, is a warmongering young noble who ends up wanting and leading an armed rebellion against the king (a.k.a. Henry). His view of honor—more regularly occurring in the world and more "correct" than Falstaff's by far—sets up the second major view of the idea of honor. With the two different ideologies, it is difficult to say what exactly Shakespeare wanted his audience to make of what "honor" really is, but perhaps he wanted his audience to see that the world is, in fact, a mixture of extremes. Thus, perhaps the correct view of honor is that it gains respect and gives those who have it a good name despite how they achieved it, only so long as the people of that age decide that to be what "honor" really is.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays