Preview

Semi-Presidential System in France

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
836 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Semi-Presidential System in France
The semi-presidential system (referred to as Semi-presidentialism) is a system of government in which a president and a prime minister are both active participants in the day-to-day administration of the state. It differs from a parliamentary republic in that it has a popularly elected head of state who is more than a purely ceremonial figurehead, and from the presidential system in that the cabinet, although named by the president, is responsible to the legislature, which may force the cabinet to resign through a motion of no confidence. (http://en.wikipedia.org)
Efficiency of the semi-presidential system
Efficiency of the Semi-Presidential System
The two countries that are most famous for using the Semi-Presidential system are Russia and France. France’s semi-Presidential system was enacted in 1958, when a threat of civil war broke out over Algeria. French leaders invited General de Gaulle to set up what is now called the “Fifth Republic.” After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia was in need of setting up a new government. Beginning in 1990 and lasting till 1993 the Russian Government went through a transition period, where they eventually formed a government that is similar to the French “Fifth Republic.” Both of these systems have advantages and disadvantages, overall they have proven effective and are finally providing stability to countries that are in desperate need for long lasting efficient governments.
A main reason for the success of the Semi-Presidential system in France is France’s heterogeneous population. Frances’s population is currently around 59 million, of this 59 million France has more than 3.6 million foreigners who come mostly from North Africa. ”In addition 1.8 million French citizens are foreign born” (Textbook, Almond p.223).
A stable form of government is not a concept

The fact that France has several political parties leads to their unique style of voting. All of the candidates are placed on the first ballet. The French

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Parliamentary system in Great Britain and the Presidential system in the United States both have histories marked by an absence of abject failure, yet neither system can be considered truly perfect. Consequently, the analyst cannot conclude that either system is better; rather, he must recognize that there are merits and faults in both systems. The Parliamentary system tends to legislate efficiently, whereas a presidential system tends toward gridlock. However, the presidential system grants both elected representatives and citizens greater influence in government. The Parliamentary system tends to favor Prime Ministers who have much experience, whereas the Presidential system…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Similar to Canada, the American system is tripartite having the executive (President),the legislature made up of Senate and Congress, and the judiciary. As Lijphart hascommented, a major difference between the two systems is in the U.S., the executive is a one person executive made up of just the President. Ostensibly the U.S. has the equivalent in thathas a cabinet population by the various secretaries (health, education, defence, etc.), butconstitutionally they are not part of the executive. This yields a disadvantage especially inthe situations of having to make critical or tough…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The different forms of democratic systems are formed upon different histories. “Great Britain with an early industrial revolution and stable government developed a strong parliament that gradually became more democratic; on the other hand, France had a late industrial…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The government of the French Republic is a semi-presidential system determined by the French Constitution. The president, currently Hollande, appoints a prime minister who then is in charge of the government themselves along with their cabinet. The nation declares itself to be an "indivisible, secular, democratic, and social Republic"…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament Vs President

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Presidential and parliamentary government systems are two main forms of democratic political systems and executive-legislative relations. Both hold advantages, disadvantages and similarities. With fluctuating stability, both systems of government have had their share of prosperity, with the ability to maintain.…

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I have chosen to select the French government for my paper. I have chosent this government baecause France was were democracy was reborn, and where there was a gradual evolution away from autocracy and toward a liberal parlimentary system. The system that today characterizes this Government.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper compares presidential and parliamentary forms of democratic government, discusses in detail the similarities and differences of the two systems as well as their strengths and weaknesses, and concludes with an observation of why some states are more likely to choose a presidential system as opposed to a parliamentary system.…

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The nature of parliamentary rule governments depends, to a vast degree, on the responsibility of the official. Researchers place the light on the parliament's part in making and breaking governments, concentrating on the arrangement and disintegration of governments, the allotment of cabinet portfolios, and cabinet term. In contrast with the presidential system, the official is not specifically chosen but rather normally rises or is drawn from the chosen parliament and, not at all like a straightforwardly chosen president. This type of parliamentary official normally comprises of an executive and a board of ministers. The cabinet or assembly is the executive official body. Generally the pioneers of the biggest party in the assembly, or the governing inside it, take the official offices (executive). Not at all like presidents, who are the main authorities with general obligations regarding government undertakings, parliamentary officials should share duties with the members. This implies that the cabinet, with the prime minister, is together in charge of the considerable number of activities of the legislature, and the head administrator, subsequently, is just first among equals. Truth be told, prime ministers in numerous nations have obtained more power than this. The principle components of a parliamentary system, along these lines, are: a straightforwardly chosen administrative body, a mix of executive…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to understand the drafting of the two constitutions, it is essential to take their historical context into account. The two texts were adopted as part of a political fresh start with a clear will to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. The previous French Republic, as well as the Weimar Republic (1918-33), had notably been paralysed by unstable governments, for the use of proportional representation in the lower house elections had led to an overly fragmented system. A series of safeguards were therefore created in the two new texts so as to ensure durable and effective governments.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia's government has a presidential - parliamentary system which consists of a dual executive with a president who is the head of state and a prime…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article is about the political and administrative structures of the French government. For French political parties and tendencies, see Politics of France.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is a multitude of political systems in the world ranging from free democracies to authoritarian regimes. Of these, however, three in particular stand out. These are the presidential system of countries such as the United States, Mexico and select other Latin American countries; the parliamentary system of countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada and Germany; and the semi-presidential system of countries such as France, Finland, and Senegal. In actuality there are many similarities between these three systems. Each, however, is also unique from each of the others. It is these similarities and contrasts, which will be the topic of this paper.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Bagehot “a Presidential system endows the incumbent with both the ceremonial functions of a head of state and the effective functions of a chief executive.”(Bagehot) In a Presidential system the executive branch exists and resides outside of the legislature. The executive branch does not purpose legislature but have the power to veto them. “The president has a fixed term in government and it is usually a difficult process trying to eliminate the president.”(Verney) The executive branch controls their cabinet and does not members of the cabinet serve at their will, this means the President can hire or fire anyone from the cabinet. According to Verney “Parliamentary system, consists of the head of government that are dependent on the confidence of the legislature and can be dismissed by a legislative vote of no confidence.”(Verney) There are two main types of parliamentary democracy which consist of the ‘Westminster system’ and the ‘Consensus system’ but there is also a hybrid of the presidential and parliamentary system which is called the semi-presidential system. The Westminster system derives from the UK and can be found in many of Britain’s ex-colonies such as India and Canada. The Westminster system tends to be a more adversarial style of debating. The consensus system…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays