Preview

Search Warrant

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
676 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Search Warrant
In some cases, one of the things that people do is to dispose of incriminatory objects, documents or things related to drug use, they often believe that evidence will not be found or do not take into account if there is a law enforcer who may take advantage of the situation. People are not aware that the law can use garbage obtain a search warrant for your home or vehicle without it being a search under the 4th amendment, especially in drug related crimes, most of the people think that they need a search warrant in order to register any part of their property, but the law considers garbage as an abandoned property in some instances and doesn’t believe that you should expect privacy in those cases, whether or not the garbage is protected from police searches without a warrant, relies on the decision of the court regardless of where was the garbage located in the property, when your garbage cans are actually put in the curb of your property, the court considers it to be abandoned property since any person can have access to it, but it your garbage is within the curtilage of your house the police will need a warrant in order to search it.
The case started in February of 1984, an informant gave the address of an illegal shipment to a federal agent, the address turned
…show more content…
The trash collector did so. Stracner searched through the garbage and found items related to drug use, such as razor blades, straws with cocaine residue, and phone bills with calls to people that had drug records. With all of this evidence, Stracner obtained a search warrant. The police searched the house, found quantities of cocaine, and arrested Greenwood and Dyanne Van Houten, another occupant of the house, on felony narcotics charges. Unfortunately, Greenwood posted bail and after a short time the complaints about late-night visits started

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A confidential informant entered a suspected drug dealer’s apartment in order to purchase crack cocaine. Once the transaction was completed, the confidential informant signaled an undercover officer who then radioed uniformed police to the suspect’s apartment. Once officers responded to the scene, they approached the door of the apartment and encountered a strong odor of burning marijuana. Officers then announced their presence while knocking on the apartment door. Once the announcement of “police” was made, the officers then heard shuffling noises inside of the apartment that were consistent with the sound of evidence being destroyed. Officers then announced their intent to enter the apartment and then kicked in the door. Once inside the apartment, the officers found drugs and drug paraphernalia in plain view. Inside of the apartment, officers apprehended the respondent, King, and others, who were in possession of drugs.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person was wanted for questioning about a recent bombing; this person was hiding in a two-family dwelling. Mapp, the owner on the top floor, refused to let the officers come in without a search warrant. After Mapp refused to immediately let the officers in they broke the door’s glass open and then unlocked and opened the door from the outside. Mapp’s attorney showed up, but the officers wouldn’t let him see his client or go inside the house. Mapp demanded the search warrant. The officer help up a paper claiming to be the warrant and Mapp put the apper in her bosom. Then the officer struggled to retrieve the paper, which he eventually recovered. Mapp was handcuffed for resisting the officer. The officer searched the entire house but all that was recovered was “lwed and lascivious book and pictures”. She was then convicted for having them in her possession.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While on patrol, I was dispatched to Super 8 motel in reference to a narcotics call. Upon arrival, I spoke with the caller and she advised that she witnessed a hand to hand transaction with two black males in the rear of the motel. Officers then made contact with the two males and identified them as Ernest Downing and James Givens. Dispatch advised that both subjects had warrants with our agency. No narcotics were located on either subjects. Sgt. Nelson arrest the Downing…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7-31-2015 at 3:00 p.m. With Julie Godzik, police disputer monitoring video cameras she knew Joy and I were working together. Alison Police officer summon us to police office over radio very unprofessional. There was a missing envelope from couch Anthony William office Monday or Tuesday. I explained to Alison, Joy was picking up Garbage and I was running sweeper so picked up the envelope and put it on couch Williams…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An arrest warrant is warrant that is issued by a judge on the states behalf, which gives authorization to arrest and put into detention an individual or the seizure and search of an individuals property. a search warrant is a legal document that gives authorization to a police officer or other official to enter and search a premises.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    San Mateo police believed that supposed gang member Eric Rangel was responsible for the felony assault that took place in a local park and also that it was a gang-related crime. As a result police obtained a search warrant of Rangel’s home on the grounds of proving “gang indicia”. This particular warrant although not very specific on what they would search for included graffiti, notebooks, photographs, sketches, poetry, and red clothing which all could possibly link him to a local gang. Also the warrant said that gang indicia could be found in such items as newspapers, artwork, compact disks, audio and video cassette, cameras, undeveloped film, address books, and telephone lists.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arizona v. Gant

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Officers were called to a residence on an anonymous tip that it was being used to sell drugs out of. When officers arrived at the residence, Rodney Gant answered the door.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police did not conduct a lawful search and seizure under the guidelines set forth in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states that search and seizure can occur during an arrest warrant that is being carried out but the "the area within control" of the suspect. The area within control was eventually decided as being the reach of arms length from the suspect. This is a lawful act designed to prevent the suspect from engaging in dangerous behavior towards others and also for the protection of any evidence the suspect may attempt to destroy. The suspect was not at the dwelling when officers arrived therefore no search and seizure should have taken place. Police officers were notified that the suspect was not present upon arrival and entry of the home. There were no reasonable causes for police to suspect that items dangerous to themselves were inside the home.…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One does not expect to leave their house and have a stranger barge into their home and rummage through their belongings. This is the situation that Petitioner David Fallsbauer found himself in with not a stranger, but a highly esteemed officer of the law, whom unreasonably dissected his possessions. Under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, citizens are protected against the unbridled and unreasonable searches and seizures. One exception is through consent to the search. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 (9th Cir. 1973). Petitioner David Fallsbauer can demonstrate through established case law that the consent his mother gave was ambiguous. Because his mother’s consent was ambiguous, the consent was not…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Search and Seize Paper

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most famous search and seizure is Mapp v. Ohio. This case happens back in 1961, March 29 and end on June 19, 1961. Which were an unreasonable searches and seizures what relates on the fourth Amendment. When the police received a tip that Dollree Mapp and her daughter were harboring a suspected bombing fugitive, they immediately went to her house and demanded entrance. Mapp called her attorney and under his advice she refused to give them entry because they did not have a warrant. Later on that day more officers came to her door and demanded that they be allowed to enter her house. After Mapp refused, they opened a door to the house through forced entry. Knock down her door completely. Mapp confronted them and demanded to see the search warrant. The police waved a piece of paper in the air claiming it was the warrant and Mapp grabbed it and put it down her shirt. The police eventually got the "warrant" back from Mapp. Also when the cop took the paper back for the warrant for her Mapp was taking a deep thought on how was that was right for him to not let her see the information about the warrant. Next, Mapp was cuffed her feet and went on to search her entire house for the fugitive. When they reached her basement they found a trunk containing a small collection of pornographic books, pictures, and photographs. Mapp said the trunk was left in the basement by a previous tenant and was not aware of its contents. The officers arrested Mapp for violating an Ohio law which prohibited the possession of obscene material. On her arrest she knows the laws for Ohio but they didn’t even give her time to discuss or tell who use to live in their home before her. No fugitive or any evidence of one was ever found at the house. Nothing but pic what Mapp didn’t have a clue who they belong to. At her trial in the Court room, Mapp was charged based on the evidence that was presented by the police. Mapp's attorney questioned the police about the…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frank Lucas

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages

    ^ a b c "U.S. Jury Convicts Heroin Informant". The New York Times. August 25, 1984. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A04E7D71338F936A1575BC0A962948260. Retrieved 2008-04-09.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To protect the American peoples 4th Amendment right “against unreasonable searches and seizures” from law enforcement using illegally seized evidence in a criminal trial against them, the exclusionary rule was created. The U.S. Supreme Court deemed any evidence illegally obtained inadmissible in a criminal trial, and any other evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure inadmissible as well. This is known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While whites who have done nothing wrong generally have little need to fear constitutional violations by the police, this is decidedly untrue for blacks. Blacks attract undesirable police attention whether they do anything to bring it on themselves or not. This makes "driving while black" a most unusual issue of constitutional criminal procedure: a search and seizure question that directly affects a large, identifiable group of almost entirely innocent…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rampart Scandal

    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages

    When officers from the Los Angeles Police Department's Internal Affairs bureau began shadowing Rafael Perez, watching their fellow cop steal massive amounts of cocaine from evidence lockers in order to sell it on the street, investigators thought they had a major misconduct case on their hands. They didn't know the half of it.…

    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Fourth Amendment

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In some cases when a warrant is being executed there is times when law enforcement can seize an item that is in plain sight even if the item in not yet specified in the warrant, but if that precaution were to be taken there would have to be an obvious reason (Salon.com). Often times law enforcement create problems when acting without a warrant, because they seize an item to soon, or invade a property without probable cause. However, there are cases where the Fourth Amendment does not always apply; which does not make it any more okay to intrude on people’s property. For example, private invasions of property, not acting in the way of the government authority are exempt from the Fourth Amendment (Wex Legal Dictionary). A seizure of a property only occurs with the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; for law enforcement to seize a property, it would mean to take into their possession, this shows just how important a warrant really is or officers could technically seize any property they would like. The people of the United States rely on the Fourth Amendment to keep our properties private and safe. Warrantless searches of private properties are mostly prohibited, if they were not prohibited law enforcement would be free to search and seize properties and objects, and ultimately arrest people without valuable…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays