Preview

Scenario 2a From The Article 'Lifeboat Earth'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1053 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Scenario 2a From The Article 'Lifeboat Earth'
Lifeboat Earth Essay What is a common good? A common good is a social goal so to say, it is when the people of the society strive to do better than how they are doing now and they are served as examples of good ideals and values, and their rewards serve as incentives to the rest of the society to mimic them, which is what contributes to the common good. An example to this is college. In college, the people who work hard and get good grades get rewarded with higher scholarships and are recognized for it. The others who did not get those grades and didn’t receive the high scholarship notice the recognition for the students who did and strive to get that recognition as well. This contributes to the common good, which is benefitting all. Keep …show more content…
They are stranded on an under-equipped lifeboat and know that not all are going to survive. Person A is ill and is in need of extra amounts of water. Instead of letting A have the extra water in order for him to survive, B,C,D,E, and F refuse to give him any at all and let him die of thirst. They knew A was the weakest link and saved the water for the stronger and healthier people because they knew they would survive. Because A was refused water he was killed instead of just dying on his own, making him a victim and this requires …show more content…
Though some death was unavoidable, A’s was not and selecting him as the victim requires justification.” In Aristotle’s theory this statement is incorrect because this was unavoidable, he was the weakest link and he wasn’t contributing to the common good, when the other five were. If they had let A survive and let him drink the extra water he needed, the others would have been left with not enough for their selves to survive and the others would have lost their lives and the point is to keep as many alive as possible. A was the weakest link and didn’t contribute so he needed to be let go in order for the others to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This quiz consist of 15 multiple choice questions and covers the material in Chapter 1. Be sure you are in Chapter 1 when you take the quiz.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Five Days At Memorial

    • 3027 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Shea, F. (2010). Hurricane Katrina and the legal and bioethical implications of involuntary euthanasia as a component of disaster management in extreme emergency situations. Annals of Health Law, 19(1), 133-139. Retrieved from http://lawecommons.luc.edu/annals/vol19/iss1/27…

    • 3027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The "common good" is a central and unifying principle of social ethics. It is the sum of those conditions of social life which allow social groups and their individual members relatively thorough and ready access to their own…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When looking at the case of The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens and the punishment that the two men face after conviction is one that requires a lot of thought (Brody and Acker, 2010). These two men were faced with a difficult situation that due to their being in a position of making life threating decisions that would determine if they all lived or if they all died with the sacrifice of one saving the other three men. These two men’s fate, after their criminal conviction, should be evaluated with the circumstances of the crime of murder with the intent of the two men to survive while stuck in the middle of the ocean with no way out (Gollwitzer and Keller, 2010).…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    UNLV Scholarship Essay

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Cannot receive in conjunction with a President’s, Midby/Byron, Provost’s, Mildred Cotner or Rebel Achievement scholarship…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Please respond to the questions in bold. All your responses to this assignment should be based on the information given on “Was Aristotle Right or Wrong?”…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paragraph Glaucon, who has taken up the argument from Thrasymachus, makes his definition of justice. He states that justice is a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear. People understand that being unjust is often to their advantage; however, they also fear being the victim of injustice. If they could act unjustly without suffering the consequences they would. This partially explains Thrasymachus? earlier definition of justice as the advantage of the strong. No reason exists for a person who can act unjustly to their own benefit without being the subject of injustice themselves not to. Justice is therefore a reciprocal agreement between peoples too weak to be immune from injustice not to be unjust and is a contract not willingly entered. Glaucon presents this definition as a culmination of previous argument and as an explanation he feels will be suitable to Socrates.…

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Robert Latimer case, as in many other cases of euthanasia, it can never…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agamemnon vs Hamlet

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think that Hamlet was more tragic in comparison to Agamemnon. The reason being is because in Hamlet Claudius is driven to kill his own brother, King Hamlet, just so he can marry his own sister-in-law. Hamlet is plotting to kill his own uncle and is speaks of his own mother in a hateful manner e:g…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Aristotle, a tragic character is not a good man who fails, nor an evil man who rises to opulence. A tragic character is in fact somewhere in between the two extremities – someone who is not necessarily unsurpassed in virtue and veracity, but also not culpable of debauchery and decadence. A tragic character has simply made "mistake," however a fatal one, that causes his demise (Esch).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle's Final Cause

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay I will begin by extracting the arguments from the extract, outlining Aristotle’s explanation of the four ‘causes’ and arguing why Aristotle has reasons for believing this. In order to achieve a considered and…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I’m at the age in my life where I have seen my family members suffer with extreme pain from a terminal debilitating illness. I know they would prefer death at this point rather than life. My mother who died of cancer, talked about dying and would have liked to stop the suffering, but she elected to deal with the excruciating pain. Or do you not know that your body is a temple or the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from GOD? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify GOD in your body. (1 Corinthians 6; 19-20, Bible) I am not for and opposed to the legalization of voluntary euthanasia for terminally ill patients as administered by physicians. If you have the strength to administer a drug to your body when close to death, I’m opposed to involuntary euthanasia also. I love and have the upmost respect for dignity in dying, and I wish that our Continuations laws and GOD’s laws would let us have control over our last dying wishes, but that is not possible. Our physicians take an…

    • 7882 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killing and Letting Die

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The other, where five persons require organs and to save their life one patient is killed to obtain these for the five in need.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the "case of the shipwrecked sailors", three men were marooned after the sinking of an oil tanker. Subject to extreme conditions and starvation, the men drew lots after about twenty five days and decided that the loser would be killed and eaten as food. When one of the men lost the draw, he pulled out his consent, and the other two men killed him anyway, eating him. Five days later, the remaining two men were rescued and ensuing actions incurred their murder charges. This seems to be a simple case over the battle of life and death, and it truly is. The two men, Dudley and Stephens, made a conscious decision to commit not only the crime of murder, but the atrocity of cannibalism. Crime is crime and law is law- when breaks a law and commits a crime, a punishment must ensue.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Without provocation, vulnerable defendants would be convicted of murder and risk long terms of imprisonment.” (Problem)…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays