They are stranded on an under-equipped lifeboat and know that not all are going to survive. Person A is ill and is in need of extra amounts of water. Instead of letting A have the extra water in order for him to survive, B,C,D,E, and F refuse to give him any at all and let him die of thirst. They knew A was the weakest link and saved the water for the stronger and healthier people because they knew they would survive. Because A was refused water he was killed instead of just dying on his own, making him a victim and this requires …show more content…
Though some death was unavoidable, A’s was not and selecting him as the victim requires justification.” In Aristotle’s theory this statement is incorrect because this was unavoidable, he was the weakest link and he wasn’t contributing to the common good, when the other five were. If they had let A survive and let him drink the extra water he needed, the others would have been left with not enough for their selves to survive and the others would have lost their lives and the point is to keep as many alive as possible. A was the weakest link and didn’t contribute so he needed to be let go in order for the others to