Preview

Satre: Condemned to Be Free

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
295 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Satre: Condemned to Be Free
Is man condemned to be free? According to Satre, man is not free to be free; he is condemned to be free. By this he meant that people are put on Earth without their consent and from then on they are completely responsible for their actions. According to Satre, God is, essentially, dead and none of his prophecies, commandments or morals limit our actions. Satre served for the French army during the Second World War and witnesses the atrocities of the holocaust firsthand. This experience, along with his bourgeois upbringing, taught him that God is "silent in the face of absurdity and horror. Because of this we are condemned to face life alone and with this comes "absolute freedom and the chilling responsibility that comes with it." A person cannot make excuses for their actions because there is no one to answer to; they are ultimately completely responsible for their actions. Satre gives an example of being condemned to be free that comes from one of his students. His student is a young boy in France during WWII who's father has joined the Nazi regime and whose only brother has died fighting the Germans. He is all that his mother has left. Does he go to Britain to avenge his brother's death or stay with his ailing mother whose very emotional survival rests in his hands? Satre says that no one can make this decision for him, no set of values can lead him to a "correct answer" because morals are too vague and broad to make a concrete decision. Satre also says that in turning to people for advice, you are making the decision for yourself because you know what advice they are going to give, making it only a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The three stories all brought into question the definition of freedom. Is freedom just the physical idea of freedom or is there more? Freedom is not just being unshackled and without an owner, it is having one’s own thoughts and ideas, one’s own morals, one’s own set of beliefs and being confident that you are being just and right. In “The Grand Inquisitor,” the character of the Grand Inquisitor believes that being free consists of having a moral compass that is correct, knowing what actions are good and which ones are bad. In “Oedipus Rex,” Oedipus believes that freedom is having a choice to your destiny. To him freedom is being able to know what each action will lead to. He believes that one’s fate is not set in stone. To Oedipa in “The Crying of Lot 49,” Freedom is truth, knowing what is going on in the world. Her idea of freedom is more controlled by the peace of mind that the outside world can bring her, being able to question reality and establishments and knowing what is what; that is freedom to her. Ultimately freedom is a mixture of all three. Freedom consists of being able to go against apparent destiny, which is achievable by knowing what is correct and what is wrong. Realizing what is just and what is unjust can help one go against what “destiny” has waiting for them. Once one realizes their own potential and limits, what the world expects of them, and what they can and are willing to do, one can start to question the reality of their world. To what extent are they in control of themselves…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King is still remembered today with peaceful protests, and his march on Washington. But he is most remembered for his I have a dream speech, setting the stage for racial injustice to be replaced with justice for black people. Dr Martin Luther King would preach peaceful protests, so they didn't turn into the cruel oppressors.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This quote is an expression of Rousseau's belief that humans are corrupted by modern day society. Rousseau says that the state is unjust and corrupt and is dominated by the rich and the powerful. While the poor only know oppression and unhappiness, these aristocrats use it selfishly to further their own interests. The modern state deprives human beings of their natural freedom and promotes self-centred individualism that undermines equality and concern for the common good.22…

    • 2083 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jean-Paul Sartre maintains a view in which that all humans are necessarily free. In Being and Nothingness, Sartre upends the conventional view of freedom and states that it is impossible for a human to not be free. In his view, to not be free is the same as to ‘cease to be’. Sartre’s existentialism views are focused on the duality of the Being-for-itself and the Being-in-itself, and his account of consciousness is merely that consciousness is always consciousness of something and that it cannot exist as consciousness itself. Consciousness is simply nothing in the views of Sartre. Simone de Beauvoir has very similar views on freedom. She adopts Sartre’s ideas on existentialism and so also claims that freedom is just human existence. However De Beauvoir adds to this by saying that not every situation is the same in regards to freedom, such as women in a harem. Women in a harem are compared to mind-sets of children because they are kept in a state of “servitude and ignorance”. Children are seen to be excluded from holding responsibility and are seen to escape the “anguish of…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To Rousseau, everyone was born independant and with unlimited opportunities. But also with unlimited risks. This, he thinks, is why people form societies... each person surrenders some freedom willingly in exchange for the greater safety provided, at least from their fellow-man, if not from nature.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau would counter my argument by saying that we are not free at all. As a collective group, we may lack any kind of initiative to work towards any goal which can leave us spinning our wheels as we all move in different directions leaving the group motionless. We often have difficulty interacting with one another in any meaningful way, and it could be argued that our decisions and behavior are largely dictated to us by a consumer culture that discourages individual thought.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Concept of Freedom

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Kant’s philosophy, as you know, the concept of freedom has given very importnat meaning. Actually Kant regard it as one of the ”ultimate ends towards which all endeavours of reason must ultimately converge”(B491). However, though the concept of freedom is so important, Kant’s explanation is unclear and seems not to be enough. the most critical reason of that vagueness comes from the unclearness of the dichotomy between “transcendental freedom” and “practical freedom”. Furthermore, the relationship is not only vague but also contradictory at a glance. He says “The denial of transcendental freedom must, therefore, involve the elimination of all…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People believe that they are truly free when they have control [p3] over others and are the ones in the powerful positions (positions of power). They strive for control and power in their lives hoping that it will offer them salvation and freedom and in return make life easier and give them an upper hand. However, freedom [p4] is unobtainable.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insofar as the sovereign is limited to acting in the best interest of its citizens, individuals are also limited to acting in the best interest of the collective will and the sovereign. Some individuals might act in their own interest only, while still enjoying all the benefits and freedoms that the sovereign provides to them. Therefore, Rousseau suggests that individuals need to be “forced to be free”: that citizens need laws that force them to abide by the measures taken by the general will. Although individuals are able to follow any liberty and instincts in a state of nature, they become limited in the civil society, by rules that are based on reason and general will. This way, they become more noble and civil. By entering the…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Freedom is not exactly what I would call a virtue. Freedom might be called a benefit of a sort of grace – though of course to seek it or to gain it might be proof of merit.”…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau addresses freedom more than any other problem and aims to explain how man is given total freedom without restrictions. Rousseau believes there are two reasons for this, first if he is not restricted by rules of state or dominated by others. The second is that if he is free from the need of artificial or material things in modern society. These make up a large amount of Rousseau’s philosophy, but the second is part of his more insightful philosophical process. Rousseau believed that modern society has changed man into being run by his own needs, he thinks that this enslavement to their own needs is to blame for exploitation of others to self-esteem issues. Rousseau has a famous phrase, "man is born free, but he is everywhere in chains," he says that modern states withhold the physical freedom that is our birth right, and do nothing to secure the civil freedom for the sake of which we enter into civil society.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.” Rousseau’s words that says much about the concept of the Social Contract and other main concepts in life. Here, he is trying to raise a question if the “governing authorities” whether support the freedom of people or are they the “chains” over people’s freedom. Rousseau refutes the claim that there is something called “natural political authority” or “political body supremacy”. The “natural authority” such as the one between the father & his child is not the same as, in somehow, the one between the ruler and his subjects, or perhaps as others saw it at that time. As a matter a fact, the force is the thing which determines the kind of relations in the last one. As he elaborated this legitimate force was not founded by nature. Rousseau suggested that an agreement (social contract) between the different members in society – those who have the authority & power and those who don’t - would legitimize the “Authority”; and in this case, there will be an exchange of interest. In support, the examples of, the relation between the slaves who surrender their liberty to the master or the relation between the king and the people, were brought up to address this inquiry; is there a real exchange of interest? Trade between preservation (security) for the right of ruling, maybe? Anyways, there must be something or an interest that people see so they give away their liberty, otherwise, they would be crazy, as Rousseau has noted.…

    • 578 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed”)…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "Man is born free but everywhere he is in chains." Jean-Jacques Rousseau. What Jean-Jacques Rousseau meant is that government, social class, wealth and poverty are man-made prisons in which people trap one another. These prisons are all around us and have many forms. Rousseau does not go so far as to claim that simple good manners, altruism and general decent behavior are also prisons. Born free merely means not born into slavery, but it is arguable whether anyone is "born free". We are all enslaved by society to some degree. As a child we are at the mercy of our parents and teachers. Our parents can screw us up so easily with the wrong food, the wrong support, the wrong advice, and so on. Our teachers can fill our minds with the wrong ideas and knowledge and we as children have to obey them. As an adult we have to work 9 to 5 five days a week for a boss to earn money to live. This means doing what ever we are told by that boss. At all times we are expected to obey thousands of laws, most of which we don't even know exist. If we don't we can lose our liberty. Family life can also be seen as a chain or prison for man. A husband is expected to be the honorable role model; never cheating on his wife, and having a job that provides. A wife is expected to cook, clean, and smother the children with affection. Grandparents are expected to instill wisdom in their grandchildren. The kids are expected to make good grades, stay out of trouble, and help out around the house. All these expectations are added to a person as soon as they gain a family. Although some of these chains are necessary to maintain order such as laws others are merely applied by those around us based off what they believe to be common and morally accepted. This system of chains makes it nearly impossible for people to be who they truly are. The people we meet may only be facades of their true selves because they constrict to the chains society has attached to them. The chains of our…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being dependent on other people will make someone to be subject to their will, and if one obeys the will of another, one is not free. Rousseau said that the free individual is one who obeys only his own will, or more explicitly, one who obeys no will other than his own.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays