Sassman V. Brown Argumentative Essay
A male prisoner contends that California's refusal to allow male inmates to apply to the ACP violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. William Sassman is a male prisoner in the California Department of Corrections (CDCR). He applies for the Alternative Custody Program (ACP), which allows low-level offenders to reunite with their families early. Sassman, a father of two and a mother dying of colon cancer applies for ACP. He is denied by the CDCR solely on the fact that he is male. Jerry Brown writes this discrimination into law. Sassman files a lawsuit. Sassman v. Brown, 73 F. Supp. 3d 1241 (2015). Gay Grunfeld of Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP, lead counsel for the plaintiff states that, “Denying men the opportunity to reunite with their families entrenches harmful gender stereotypes suggesting that only women can be caregivers, and harms children by preventing them from re-establishing and furthering their relationships with their fathers.
…show more content…
It also contributes to California’s longstanding overcrowding crisis.” The District Court orders the CDCR to stop enforcing the female only provisions constructed by the Governor and ordered to immediately stop denying applicants to the ACP solely for being
It also contributes to California’s longstanding overcrowding crisis.” The District Court orders the CDCR to stop enforcing the female only provisions constructed by the Governor and ordered to immediately stop denying applicants to the ACP solely for being