Preview

Samuel Scheffler Agent Centered Prerogative

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
506 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Samuel Scheffler Agent Centered Prerogative
Samuel Scheffler is a moral and political philosopher who is an University professor in the Department of Philosophy and the Law School at New York University. He is also a son of a Harvard Philosopher named Israel Scheffler. He was also a student of a distinguished philosopher Thomas Nagel.
Scheffler’s Agent-centered prerogative was used in the Agent – centered Deontological Theories. Agenr-centered Deontological says that to taxonomize deontological theories, the most traditional way is to divide them between agent-centered and victim -centered or patient -centered theories. The idea of an agent-centered prerogative is that a moral person can have a prerogative not to do the acts that produce the greatest or best consequences. This idea was first introduced to moderate the demands of
…show more content…
It has implications on global justice especially on the issue about fighting against world poverty. There are called agent – relative reason, agent-relative obligation and agent -related permission. All these three are connected according to the agent-centered theories. It is said that we have both permission and obligations that give us agent-relative reasons for actions. An agent-relative reason is called such because it is a reason relative to the agent whose reason it is. It need not constitute a reason for anyone else. An agent-relative obligation is an obligation for a particular agent to take or refrain from taking some action. For the reason that it is called agent-relative obligation, the obligation does not necessarily give anyone else a reason to support that action. An agent-relative permission is a permission from some agent to do some act even though others may not be permitted to aid

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deontologists base their decisions about what’s right on broad, abstract universal ethical principles or values such as honesty, promise keeping, fairness, loyalty, rights, justice, compassion, and respect for persons and property.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This system concerns itself with determining the greater good and what decision will be beneficial to the most people. The second system presented is the deontological system. Under this system, a worker would look at the needs of the individual and determine the best course of action for the patient themselves. There is no suggestion that these two methods should conflict. In fact, quite often, what is best for a patient is often what is best for society as a whole. The problem arises in the instances where these two methods conflict. In these cases, a worker must apply the concept of prudency. This is the idea that a similar person would make the same decision under the same…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Numerous problems can arise in a society which emphasizes both individual rights and the common good because the two goals are often conflicting in nature. Everyone desires individual rights, but to protect the common good a social contract must be in effect. This means that some personal rights must be sacrificed for the good of the community. The natural rights philosophy considered the rights of the individual to be of primary…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Choices are morally required, forbidden, or permitted. Deontology is a moral theory that guides our choices and assesses what kind of person we are or should be; dependent on rules, moral laws, and intuition.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most fundamental moral obligation of the individuals is that they may not violate the rights of other individuals to advance their own ends. Even if violating one person's rights would protect more rights overall, such an action would not be morally justifiable because it would treat that individual as a means and not an end. Robert nozick explains the source of this moral side constraint:" side constraints upon action reflect the underlying Kantian principle than individuals are ends and not merely means; they may not be sacrificed or used for the achieving of other ends without their consent. Individuals are inviolable." Nozick continues:' the moral side constraints upon what we may do… reflect the fact that no moral balancing act can take place among us; there is no moral outweighing of one of our lives by others so as to lead to greater overall social good. There is no justified sacrifice of some of us for others. The root idea, namely, that there are different individuals with separate lives and so no one may be sacrifices for others, underlies the existence of moral side constraints." Accordingly the criterion is respect for moral side…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retrieved March 22, 2005 from the World Wide Web: Institute For Global Ethics, November 10, 2003, http://www/globalethics.org/newsline/members/issue.tmpl?articleid=11100316510695…

    • 2150 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In humanitarianism, the most relevant key concept is human rights, which is illustrated as rights to which people are entitled by the virtue of being human. Human rights are universal, meaning they apply to everyone regardless of their gender, culture or religion. In this essay I will mention key terms including violence, conflict and justice, as these are at the heart of humanitarian intervention. Power, which is not meant to be of much importance when discussing humanitarianism, is in reality, crucial. And this leads on to my first point.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Change Must Come

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where you did not know where you next meal was coming from. Could you live life knowing that you would never get that full satisfaction of being full? I do even know if I could do that one. In Peter Singer’s article, “ Famine, Affluence and Morality,” Singer addresses these idea just as such. Throughout this essay I will state Singer’s goal in writing this article while presenting his argument in relation to his view. I then will give u counter - arguments to his points while providing Singer’s response. I will then wrap up by giving you the concept of marginal utility and the concept of Singer’s proposed world of charity and duty. Finally, I will provide you with my view on Singer’s ideas and essay.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this essay I will be comparing the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. I will be discussing the differences in how each theory addresses ethics and morality, and lastly explain a personal experience between virtue, values, and moral concepts, and how they relate to one of the three theories. Each ethics has things that are the same and that are different. Virtue theory emphasizes the role in moral philosophy, so instead of doing a duty to show good consequences. Utilitarianism is good actions made by a good person. When the action that is right is finalized there are always repercussions for actions that are not completed. Deontological ethics places a special emphasis on a duty and human actions.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Macro Systems

    • 1227 Words
    • 4 Pages

    interactionist theory to poverty. Lastly, it will describe the role and responsibility of the human…

    • 1227 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes 4th Meditation

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: 1. Feinberg, Joel, and Shafer-Laundau, Russ. Reason and Responsibility. 12th. Belmont, CA, USA: Thomson and Wadsworth, 2005.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loyalty In The Iliad

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Loyalty, and the idea of a responsibility hierarchy between self, group, and population is a factor that should be identified and followed respectively when faced with a consequential scenario. This hierarchy: Self over group and group over population, is the order in which one should base any decision with consequential outcomes, and only in a position where these consequences are minimized, can the individual begin to aid those parties in relation to the presented hierarchy. Respectively, self is the loyalty to one’s own personal needs, whereas group is one’s responsibility to those similar to self (i.e. common interests or state), and lastly population is one’s loyalty to every human – even to those with conflicting interests. Through textual…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay, I will refute the statement that there is natural duty to obey the law even in reasonably decent democratic societies in order to rescue others from the dangerous conditions of the state of nature. To do this, I will explore a world in which there is a natural duty to obey the law to evaluate if it is the best way to protect us from the dangerous conditions. Next, I will explore the ambiguity in the natural theory to sufficiently justified a duty to obey the law simply because it is a law. Through these analyses, I will address the more important question: under a recent democratic society, what kind of duty do we have to obey the law?…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontologists are concerned with the concept of duty. This highlights that people are concerned with fulfilling what they…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay Table

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A major challenge of deontological approaches is deciding which duty, obligation, right, or principle takes precedence because, as we said earlier, ethical dilemmas often pit these against each other. What does the deontologist do if one binding moral rule clashes with another? Can it be determined which is the more important right or principle? Because the U.S. Constitution is based on a rights approach, many U.S. public policy debates revolve around questions such as these. For example, the abortion debate rests on the question of whether the rights of the mother or the fetus should take precedence. In ethical dilemmas at work, loyalty to your boss or organization can easily clash with other strongly held values such as compassion or fairness. What if your boss tells you that you must lay off a subordinate, an excellent performer, because that subordinate was hired last and the principle guiding the layoff is “the last hired is the first fired.” But, imagine that this subordinate will lose his health insurance with the layoff and you know that his child is seriously ill. Another subordinate who has been with the company longer is also a good performer, but is single and has no family obligations.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays