In her article, “New Airport Policy: Grin and Bare It,” she criticizes the people who don’t agree, but her main purpose is to persuade the travelers that there is nothing wrong with the scanners. Unlike Rosen, Shultz is completely for the use of these scanners in airports. She sees no reason why the United States citizens should have an issue with these scanners, being that these specific scanners are the governments choice, when the citizens trust the government with so much else; such as licenses, seat belts, traffic laws, and assuming other drivers on the road passed the same drivers test by the government. Shultz believes that everyone that says they don’t trust the government needs to either suck it up, or just don’t use the
In her article, “New Airport Policy: Grin and Bare It,” she criticizes the people who don’t agree, but her main purpose is to persuade the travelers that there is nothing wrong with the scanners. Unlike Rosen, Shultz is completely for the use of these scanners in airports. She sees no reason why the United States citizens should have an issue with these scanners, being that these specific scanners are the governments choice, when the citizens trust the government with so much else; such as licenses, seat belts, traffic laws, and assuming other drivers on the road passed the same drivers test by the government. Shultz believes that everyone that says they don’t trust the government needs to either suck it up, or just don’t use the