Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Rutherford's Atom Theory Explained

Good Essays
895 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rutherford's Atom Theory Explained
Science Holiday Homework
Aldo 10D

The Rutherford’s Experiment and the Geiger Marsden experiment were both the same experiment, where Rutherford being the mentor of Geiger and Marsden in the investigation of the experiment at the University of Manchester in 1909.
The experiment was so important because it changes our view and understanding upon the structure of the atom. Before Rutherford, there was a man named Joseph John Thomson who proposed the structure of the atom. He stated that the electrons of the atoms are actually inside the atom, and the atom itself is positively charged, like a “raisin pudding”. The electrons are scattered all around the atom. He stated that the electrons and the positively charged material cancel each other, making it stable. The structure of the atom, proposed by Thomson. (J.J Thomson Plum Pudding Model, Batul Nafisa Baxamusa, 2011. Retrieved on June 26th, 2012 from URL: http://www.buzzle.com/articles/labeled-atom-diagram.html)

9 important things that would get 9 marks:
-Clear explanation
-Scientific language
-Graphics
-Why’s are answered (Why gold foil was used, etc)
-How’s are answered (how do we fire the alpha particle, etc)
-The aim of the experiment
-References
-Why was the experiment important to us?
-Is the new structure of atom correct?

The aim of the experiment was to elucidate the structure of the atom, as there were so many theories about the structure of the atom at that time, which was championed by J.J Thomson. Rutherford and his team wanted to find out how the alpha particle would react against the thin foil.
Geiger and Marsden constructed a lead box (to prevent radiation spreading all over the vacuum) with a hole on the center of the box, and inserted an alpha particle emitter (decaying polonium-214) inside the box. About five centimeters in front of the hole on the lead box was a gold foil with approximately 8.6x10-6 thick. The apparatus was then surrounded by zinc sulfide screen, which would glow when the alpha particle hit it. The experiment was then done in a vacuum in complete darkness, to ensure that the observer could see the glowing alpha particle.
They used gold leaf foil because gold leaf foil is highly malleable, thus can be cut to micro sizes. It was the best material for the job, as alpha particles only penetrates through thin materials, and such small size would ensure that all the alpha particles make it though the gold leaf foil.
Geiger and Marsden then would fire the alpha particle upon the gold foil. Most of the alpha particle went straight across the gold foil, consistent with J.J Thomson’s theory, because the positive charge of the alpha particle and the negative charge of the gold foil would attract each other, making the alpha particle passes through easily. Some of the alpha particles actually bounces a little bit off track, because the electrons of the alpha particle would occasionally meet with the electrons of the gold foil. They repel each other, but because of the speed of the alpha particle, the inclination of the alpha particle was not big and therefore not significant.
But, surprisingly, few of the alpha particles actually bounce off the predicted track of where it should’ve gone. The alpha particles sometimes create a ninety-degree bounce, and some even bounces right back to the shooter! J.J Thomson could not explain this phenomenon using his model of atom, as such deflection would require a concentrated energy of the positive charged material, while the positively charged material was big and therefore it was not concentrated enough to hold such energy to repel another very fast travelling positively charged material.

A picture describing Rutherford’s experiment (Rutherford’s Experiment and Atomic Model, David Darling, 2011. Taken on July 23rd, 2012 from URL: http://www.daviddarling.info/index.html#latestnews)
Rutherford then made a conclusion that the positively charged material (proton) was concentrated on the center of the atom, with the electrons surrounding it from a far distance. This implies that the atom consisted of mostly empty space.
So, even though the alpha particle was moving very fast, it can still be deflected with high inclination or even bounces back, because the protons are concentrated, thus they would have high energy to deflect each other on such high degrees.
Now, our understanding upon the atom’s structure has gotten a further step better, even though the Rutherford’s structure of atom is not absolutely correct. With this model, the electrons would emit energy to repel against the proton (positive and negative charges attract each other). The energy would eventually be gone and the electron finally collides with the nucleus.
From this result, it can be concluded that Rutherford’s model of atom couldn’t be the conclusive model of the atom.

References: 1. Rutherford’s experiment, Oracle Thinkquest, 2009. Taken on July 23rd, 2012 from URL: http://library.thinkquest.org/19662/low/eng/exp-rutherford.html 2. The Rutherford’s experiment, 2011. Taken on July 12th, 2012 from URL: http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/meis/Rutherford.htm 3. The Rutherford’s experiment, Michael W. Davidson and the Florida State University, 1995-2012. Taken on June 25th, 2012 from URL: http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/electromag/java/rutherford/ 4. Rutherford’s Experiment and Atomic Model, David Darling, 2008.
Taken on July 22nd, 2012 from URL: http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/R/Rutherfords_experiment_and_atomic_model.html

References: 1. Rutherford’s experiment, Oracle Thinkquest, 2009. Taken on July 23rd, 2012 from URL: http://library.thinkquest.org/19662/low/eng/exp-rutherford.html 2. The Rutherford’s experiment, 2011. Taken on July 12th, 2012 from URL: http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/meis/Rutherford.htm 3. The Rutherford’s experiment, Michael W. Davidson and the Florida State University, 1995-2012. Taken on June 25th, 2012 from URL: http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/electromag/java/rutherford/ 4. Rutherford’s Experiment and Atomic Model, David Darling, 2008. Taken on July 22nd, 2012 from URL: http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/R/Rutherfords_experiment_and_atomic_model.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It took a great number of shots to actually hit the nucleus because the size of the atom was so much larger than the nucleus. Rutherford proposed that the "hit ratio" was approximately equal to the volume ratio. This is the hypothesis you will test in this experiment.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though all of Rutherford's discoveries are exceedingly important, I believe that the most important one is, his discovery of the an atom's nuclear structure The atom now consist of a positive nucleus with negative electrons in circular orbits around it. In addition to this, he discovered that atoms have a dense core (nucleus) where protons and neutrons are located. Along…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiment: Neutral atoms sealed in a cathode ray tube produce a beam of particles that are attracted to the positive end of a magnet, but repelled by the negative end.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rutherford is a Physicist, Scientist. Ernest is also known as the world’s first successful alchemist. Ernest Rutherford was the first scientist to explore into the structure of the atom Unlike many people, Rutherford was not very known for his achievements like the Gold Foil experiment, which helped prove that electrons orbited the nucleus surrounded by empty space.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Six scientists were chosen to see which one had made the greatest contribution to our current understanding of the atom’s structure. Our knowledge of an atom’s appearance and structure have evolved from years and years of development and contribution from many different scientists. Scientist Ernest Rutherford had been the best contributor to the understanding of the atomic structure. Why Rutherford was chosen is because his work had information on protons, neutrons, and electrons, the main components that make up the atom, showed what the atom looks like when the three are put together, and had also been the discoverer of the nucleus which is the one of them most important parts of the atom’s structure.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Dalton Theory

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although John Dalton was the scientist to discover the first scientific theory of an atom, J.J Thomson was next to research the atom. While evaluating Daltons work, he found that atoms are not indivisible. He experimented and found that when the atom is excited by an electrical current it causes the atom to break apart into two parts. Then to further explain his findings, Thomson created a model which was called the Plum-pudding atom. In the model the “plums” are the negatively charged electrons, while the “pudding” is the mass of positive…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rutherford directed a narrow beam of α-particles, all of the same kinetic energy, in an evacuated container at a…

    • 3903 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pm3110 Quiz 1

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    _____ 10. In the history of the development of the atomic theory, new experimental evidence has tended to…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Joseph John (J.J.) Thomson (1856 - 1940) was mainly a physicist, his discoveries are closely connected to the chemical community. Thomson used Crookes high vacuum cathode ray tube in his discovery of electrons. He found the green beam produced by the cathode ray tube was a completely negatively charged material. Experimenting with different electrically charged plates and magnets in the cathode ray tube and observing the deflection of the rays he had enough evidence to say that particles smaller than atoms existed. By doing this experiment multiple times he compiled enough data to conclude that the mass of one of these particles, which he called an electron, was lighter than an atom of hydrogen by around 2,000 times. He also found the ratio of charge to mass (e/m) would be the same for any electron.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Earnest Rutherford preformed en experiment later that proved an idea of Dalton's wrong. With his gold foil experiment, Rutherford found atoms to be consisted of at least two smaller parts, unlike Dalton's idea that atoms are indivisible. He established that an atom includes a tiny, positively charge nucleus, which is surrounded by electrons.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Gwyn Jeffrey’s Moseley: worked with Ernest Rutherford experimented with 38 metals, he found that the positive charge of each element nucleus increased by one from element to element as they were arranged in mendeleevs periodic table, lead to modern definition of atomic number (# of protons in atoms nucleus) and the recognition the atomic number was basis of organization of periodic table.…

    • 2160 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1913, a Danish physicist named Niels Bohr put Rutherford's findings together with the observed spectra to come up with a new model of the atom in a real leap of intuition. I believe that the Bohr’s model of atom explains well about the atomic theory, because in his experiments it is shown and explained the structure of an atom. His famous suggestion is about that the electrons orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Bohr experimented with atomic spectrum that proved his suggestion.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    17. Which of the following statements is NOT part of Rutherford’s revision of his former teacher’s atomic…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alchemy Research Paper

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Instead of transforming lead into gold he changed nitrogen into oxygen by loading it with alpha particles. Rutherford’s point was that some alchemical ambitions now seem ridiculous but, its techniques, instruments, and attitudes lie at the heart of experimental science. Ancient alchemist had similar motives as modern day scientist, there goal to alter and understand the world. Alchemist influenced the world in many different ways. For example, they invented stills for collecting liquid. Although they never created the gold they needed to isolate all the chemicals they were working on. By isolating these chemicals and running controlled experiments over and over again they were providing the template for the scientific method. By the 18th century alchemist had given up on the goal of transforming lead into gold, but the understanding of material composition of things through analysis to make useful products like medicines and various redefined chemicals were inherited from the 16th and 17th century…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hi.Dox

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    10. ____ What was concluded about the structure of the atom as the result of the gold foil experiment? (1) A positively charged nucleus is surrounded by positively charged particles. (2) A positively charged nucleus is surrounded by mostly empty space. (3) A negatively charged nucleus is surrounded by positively charged particles. (4) A negatively…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays