Preview

Russia: Transition from Centralized Economy to Capitalist Economy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Russia: Transition from Centralized Economy to Capitalist Economy
Russia: Transition from Centralized Economy to Capitalist Economy After the fall of Soviet Union in 1991, the transition of its centrally planned economy to capitalist economy was hindered with several difficulties. Before the collapse of Soviet Union, it was practicing a command economy wherein state planners assigned the production of particular manufactures to particular places. All factories, farms and energy providers were state controlled. After the collapse, the new leadership decided to privatize all the state controlled businesses, but due to corruption among state representatives the process of privatization soon became rife with corruption, giving well placed opportunists unjustified advantage, thus denying the new government badly needed revenues. Hence, very little progress was made towards diversification of the economy. There was a lack of organizational infrastructure for capitalist economy like independent banks, stock markets and business legal system. New management was unqualified for implementing stable corporate governance under the conditions of new economy. For example, when on January 2, 1992; Russian President ordered the liberalization of foreign trade, prices and currencies; millions of Russians took to streets for trading their goods, resulting in an unorganized marketplace. Since the production of goods was for particular items was concentrated at particular places, it gave traders an undue advantage and created inflation. Black markets and crime became rampant, dominated by strong, powerful and wealthy people and as a consequence people with influence and connections with state representatives and wealthy were the only ones to gain an advantage of the liberalization. The state officials and the new leadership, still new to the idea of de-centralized economy or capitalist economy, were not competent enough to measure the needs of free economy and failed to foresee the needs of a common man. they lacked knowledge about


Cited: Muller, de Blij. Geography: Realms, Regions and Concepts. Jefferson City: Wiley, 2010. 116-121. Print. Economy of Russia. n.d. 12 June 2013. . Michael-Matsas, Savas. "Russia: The Transition to Capitalism, in Crisis." International Worker (2005). Journal.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The whole purpose of this chapter is to clarify the pivotal need of geographic comprehension in society. Geography is divided mainly into two categories; human and physical geography. Each geography examines different kinds of information. Physical geography clarifies the physical landscapes of districts and places while human geography looks to break down the spatial circulation of humans and their cooperation’s. Chapter 1 summaries the significance of geography and how it influences all aspects of life. Regardless of what or where we are going, geography is some way or another required in those things. Everything in the planet has an immediate association to place, area, development, interaction and region. The chapter additionally abridges…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Huge changes came to Russia when the tsar Alexander II came to power. His reforms freed the serfs and industrialized the nation’s economy. In the past, Russian serfs were tied to the land and worked on the land for the land owners and received no pay. While they were permitted to have farms of their own, serfs had to work the lord’s land whenever called upon, even during times of harvest when their own crops need harvesting or tending. Due to Alexander II’s reforms, these serfs were freed. Once these serfs were freed, they either went into the city to look for work or out to the country to find land. Many also fled to surrounding societies to escape the Russian hardships of being a serf. Russian labor was also changed through Industrialization, also influenced by Alexander II’s reforms. Factories and railroads expanded and industries like coal, steel, and petroleum boomed. Serfs who were emancipated found easy work in factories that were booming. With new industries creating new jobs and plenty of freed serfs to take them, the Russian labor system greatly changed between 1750 and 1914.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This period of time ensured many changes, positive and negative regarding the labor system. It is evident that serfdom congealed from about 1750 onwards, meaning that the peasants were required to provide free labor for a particular number of days a year or a specific amount of money to their lords. The time of labor depended on when it was needed. For example, during harvesting or sowing. The job had to be done, regardless, the peasants own farming responsibilities. Subsequent to the emancipation of serfs in 19th century, they had to buy their own freedom, as they were granted land they also had to pay for working on it. Eventually, such strict limitations caused farmers and peasants to leave their farming business and seek more opportunities in large urban areas. That lead to Russia’s rapid industrialization during the 18th. However, prior to Russia's industrialization workers set up guilds to protect their interests. Such guilds were often set up in areas where workers migrated to work - such as logging camps, and were often communal. Although, as the industrialization finally occurred in 19th century, people traveled to cities seeking more opportunities, causing the population to extremely swell. Such overpopulation ensued in dangerous working conditions, very poor sanitation and exploitation of the workers. Such circumstances were very hard to fight off as Russia didn’t have a very strong reformist movement to address such problematic aspects of the society. Unsuccessful attempts to reform the working class troubles, resulted in growing unrest and discontent among all. Eventually, public announcement of opinions was strictly forbidden and punished by a trip to Siberia, which was later widely expanded by the…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1957, Khrushchev attempted to decrease the amount of power the central government had and instead give power to regional governments. In turn, the economy was severely impacted. It was very hard to restructure the USSR without having a strong central authority. Additionally, the Soviet economy was full of imbalances especially in consumer industries. The USSR tried to produce only what was necessary in order to eliminate waste, however they usually did not produce enough which caused a shortage of goods. Furthermore, the Soviets did not have much money to invest elsewhere as they spent a good portion of their GDP on their military and their various space programs. Finally, Khrushchev spread the investments he could make to widely which, consequently, did not result in anything efficient being done due to the lack of…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the poor working conditions and the inequality that industrialization under capitalism creates (“The Industrial Revolution and Economic Growth”, 529) it is still a necessary step for Russia because it lays the groundwork for a successful socialist and eventually communist system of government that will allow all members of Russia to flourish. “[The Communist] openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions;”(Carl Marks and Friedrich Engel, The Communist Manifesto) Therefore it is important to note that capitalism is an impractical form of government that should not be implemented for any long term scenario it is merely a stepping stone that is unfortunate but essential to the development of a successful government. Then why must Russia endure capitalism? Why not skip straight to communism? It is for this reason, A does not equal C meaning that each step in the process is essential to getting the end result.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economy of the Soviet Union was based on a system of state ownership of the means of production, collective farming, industrial manufacturing and centralized administrative planning. Starting in 1924, with Stalin rising to power, the period of the centralized economy made the central government of Russia formulate all economic decisions. The command economy was one of the key features of the Soviet society, however, it came with benefits and setbacks. For example, an advantage would be low levels of employment and a disadvantage would be lack of competition. A major strength was an enormous supply of oil and gas.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Soviet Union implemented a command economy in Lenin’s reign, but it furthered quite a lot during the mid-1920s when Stalin was put into power. This economy had many weaknesses, created several burdens, and finally, it collapsed. A command economy is a system in which the government oversees all the production and profits the country makes. In this type of economy, the government controls all the money of the country, this includes prices and wages. Within the industry, the administration also sees what is made.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, when Gorbachev tried to reform communism, it created political unrest. The Soviet Union was losing strength because it couldn’t handle its own reforms. Gorbachev’s main contribution to why the Soviet Union collapsed was “glasnost”, or free press. He also had perestroika, the economic reforms. The reason why glasnost was the one that lead to the USSR’s failure is because in China, only perestroika was introduced and China withstood collapse. However, perestroika…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: de Blij, M. N. (2012). Geography "Regions Realms, Regions and Concepts" 15 ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The economy of the soviet Union played a big part as to why they collapsed because it had been stagnating throughout the 1970s, as Western economies moved into new technologies, the Soviets economy stayed based on Karl Marx's analysis of the British economy in the mid 19th Century. The Soviets focused on heavy industry such as coal, iron…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did the Cold War Begin

    • 2700 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Soviet Union was a communist society. That meant that everything was owned by the country, however, it was controlled by the government. This idea was the total opposite of the United States and many other countries where businesses were ran and owned privately. The Soviets wanted the nations that they governed to operate as they did.…

    • 2700 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Role Setting Plays

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Foster, Thomas C. "Geography Matters . . ." How to Read Literature Like a Professor. New York: HarperCollins, 2003. 163-74. Print.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economy wasn’t doing so good because the Soviet Union had grown to a size that…

    • 528 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mercury

    • 1938 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Course Objectives: An economic system is a set of institutional arrangements that constrain, coordinate, and facilitate the economic activities of a society, and these systems can vary widely. Comparative Economic Systems develop a framework in which to study the origin, structure, problems, and performance of various economic systems. Two major and competing economic systems that have existed over most of the past century have been the systems of market and centrally planned economies. This course will spend time looking at different variations and combinations of these economic systems. The collapse of Soviet Union as well as its centrally planned/administrative command economy in 1991, has also led to a host of new questions and new problems of comparative economic performance of countries which will also be explored within our comparative framework.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays