Preview

Rulemaking: Different Interpretations Of The Law

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
116 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rulemaking: Different Interpretations Of The Law
Rulemaking is so complex because it has so many different interpretations of the law.
Even though rulemaking has an affect on citizens, very few people know about rulemaking, and even fewer understand how rulemaking works, therefore, there is limited participation. Since, there is a lack of awareness and participation, it is very hard for citizens to take a position on a law/bill. Also, rulemaking goes through some many processes, which makes it more complicated to follow, especially because of the bureaucracy. Citizens may not be aware that rules can’t be enforced if not published in the Federal Register; which are based on complex technical or scientific information, rules can’t be effective until 30 days after publication.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Composers represent conflicting perspectives through their own unique experiences and values as their political and social contexts. Geoffrey Robertson's self styled memoir 'The Justice Game' written in the late 1900's heavily reflects these conflicting perspectives in the 'Trials of Oz' and 'The Romans in Britain' through the employment of emotive and persuasive language and ridicule in the form of satire to which convey Robertson's view through his eyes. Such conflicts also portrayed in Charles Waterstreet's article' It's a long fickle road to justice' which similar to Robertson's use of persuasive techniques utilizes satire to challenge and question the myopic procedures of the legal system.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rulemaking is the making, altering, or rejecting and nullifying of rules that are used by government agencies after congress permitted statutes. These statutes are additionally called regulations. The creation of regulations begins in congress where they are the prerequisites for the creation of the agencies that are involved or as a capacity of an agency office, and not by the executive part of the government. The laws begin with a lawmaking act of…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law is necessary for the effective operation of a society as it ensures the protection of a population and certifies that justice is fair. The law is essential as if it was non-existent, society would descend to anarchy. The law is in place to protect the whole of society, especially weaker individuals or groups within a community. Another reason that law is fundamental, is it provides equity and fairness within society; however, this is not always accurate as a number of aspects can result in an inequality such as an individual’s financial status, or a language barrier. This can be supported through various media files regarding legal processes, concepts and outcomes.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A) The source refers to the literal rule. Describe the literal rule using the source and cases to illustrate your answer (15 Marks)…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are classifications and categories of law that can be helpful to use to determine what law corresponds with a particular action or crime. Some of the laws we will be looking at in this paper are; substantive law, procedural law, criminal law, civil law, common law, and statutory law.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judges do both. Judges interpret the statue law and they make the common law. There are two types of law one would be the primary law, which is also known as the statue law and the secondary law, which is also known as the common law. For the primary law it is created by the legislature, which is the parliament as the parliament has the power to make the statue because the people elected them. So the judges interpret the primary law, which was created by the legislature. For the secondary law, which is the common law, the judges make this common law base on the cases and it is developed extremely slow and cautious and incremental bit by bit.as they would need to consider the principle and the loopholes in the law that they might be create or they could also make it so that it only applies in that particular case. Primary law always trumps secondary law meaning if there is a primary law the court should always use the primary law for the case. If there isn’t any primary law for the particular case then the court shall use the secondary law by referring the previous cases. They would interpret the existing statue law and the previous decision of higher ranking courts from there they would then decide whether to use the existing law or create the law by making legal principles which courts lower down the hierarchy are bound to follow depending on the case which they are attending to. This is so that they could be consistent with their ruling and it would be fair.…

    • 3013 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lawmaking Process

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Law making are the procedures of establishing and creating the rules and orders to be followed by citizens of a certain state. A number of administrative agencies and interest groups play a predominant role in the process of law making. (Furlong and Kerwin, 2005).The interest groups may be described as ‘groups organized in a manner whose existence is to provide a permanent representation of the particular interests of the people.’ Their aim is to influence the legislation process rather than putting out their candidates for the election process. Interest groups can provide a means of participation in politics between elections. Interests groups are able to gather sufficient support to force the Government to either amend or sometimes repeal legislation. Interests groups enable both causes and interests to be heard in hopes of exerting influence in the lawmaking process. More and more interest groups are taking more advantage opportunities to participate in the lawmaking process. ‘Groups serve as an organized “bridge” between the judicial and legislative arenas by providing information to both branches and thereby increasing inter-constitutional communication.’ (Dulk and Pickeril, 2003)…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the United States first came to be, leaders from each colonies came together to make a set of rules. These set of rules are called The Constitution. It took many people to make the rules and they had to change it many times. They even had a convention to try to better the rules. The outcome of all of this an Introduction and seven articles that the people of the United States had to follow.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Limits of Policy-Making

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The biggest limitation facing policymaking these days are the competing interests of several different groups. As McCool describes, “Public policies are the product of many individuals with different values, preferences, beliefs and knowledge”2 Firstly, it is politicians who make policy. Their main objective is to keep their jobs and therefore make policy that will get them votes in the next election. Successful politicians are ones who pass policies that will keep them in office or gain approval from other politicians or bureaucrats.3 Secondly, interest groups attempt to influence policy makers to achieve their own ends; which may or not be good for society as a whole. In her introduction to the policy making process, Pal makes this clear : “Each player or set of players tries to influence the policy process in…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges are highly qualified professionals that enforce the law in court while dealing with cases but sometimes, judges need help understanding the law that has been put in place by Parliament. Statutory interpretation helps judges in court understand a piece of delegated legislation when the words are unclear. There are a few reasons why the meaning of an Act may be uncertain:…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The essence of parliamentary sovereignty has been expressed by Bogdanor as “what the Queen in Parliament enacts is law”.…

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Statutory Interpretation

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Evaluate the rules of interpretation which guides judge’s in the interpretation of statutes or acts of Parliament and the presumption they applied in this process.…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Statutory Interpretation

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Discuss the rules and other aids used in statutory interpretation which the judges could use to help them arrive at a decision in each of the appeals. You should also pay attention to judicial precedent and assess whether the case that the appellants wish to use may be binding on the Court of Appeal.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Statutory interpretation is the process of a judge interpreting and applying legislation. Interpretation of statutes is necessary as many of them where written hundreds of years ago and language has changed. Society has also changed and so statutes need to be applied to modern society. Drafting errors may have been made when the statute was written which would then require interpretation. For example, the board term of 'type' used in the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. Judges use a number of rules and aids in order to interpret these laws. However, there are disadvantages of interpretation. It is Parliament's role to make laws and the role of the Judiciary to enforce them. If a judge interprets a law to their desired outcome, rather than Parliament's desired outcome, Parliamentary sovereignty is not respected. Interpretation may require the personal opinion of a judge, and as judges are unelected, it may be seen as undemocratic.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is no concept so central to philosophy than Reason. It is reason that is the very focal point of all discovery and knowledge, for a philosopher to achieve any kind of enlightenment without the use of reason is impossible. Reason is, arguably, that which separates man from beast, that consciousness and ability to analyze and comprehend. It has been through reason that societies and governments have been created: our own through the reasoning of our founders utilizing the reasoning of John Locke and other liberal thinkers of the "Enlightened" period.…

    • 4175 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays