Preview

Roskie

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roskie
Rockie Loyd Millares
Gerald Leal
SECOND DIVISION
PERFECTO DEL ROSARIO, JR., Petitioner,
G. R. No. L-65004
November 29, 1983 -versus-
HON. ALFREDO A. ROSERO, Respondent. R E S O L U T I O N
MAKASIAR, J.:

The Court resolved to give due course to the petition, to consider the Comment of the Solicitor General as a responsive pleading, and to decide the case.
As recounted by the Solicitor General in his comment, it is undisputed that on February 16, 1983, petitioner was charged with theft of some articles valued at Three Hundred Seventy Five [P375.00] Pesos. Petitioner was detained for failure to post bail. Assisted by CLAO counsel, upon arraignment, petitioner pleaded guilty. In a decision dated May 5, 1983 but promulgated on May 11, 1983 at 2 o'clock in the afternoon, respondent Judge Alfredo A. Rosero sentenced him to an indeterminate imprisonment of from six months as minimum, to one year and one month as maximum, and to pay the offended party the sum of P375.00, crediting him, however, with the entire period of his preventive imprisonment.cralaw
Immediately after the sentence was read to petitioner, respondent Judge issued a "Commitment on Final Sentence" that very same day, May 11, 1983, addressed to the Provincial Jail Warden to whom the petitioner was committed. Also, that very same day, May 11, 1983, petitioner prepared his application for probation which was received by the Court on May 18, 1983: On May 20, 1983, respondent Judge denied the application for probation on the ground that "the sentence of conviction became final and executory on May 11, 1983, when the accused actually commenced to serve his sentence."
On June 7, 1983, petitioner filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Order dated May 20, 1983 denying his application for probation, on the ground that his having been whisked to jail on May 11, 1983 did not constitute the commencement of the service of sentence as the judgment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Procedural History: Mapp petition for a writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court for the appreal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-3708 > , Defendant-Appellee. N On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. No. 02-00708—James G. Carr, Chief District Judge. Argued: June 23, 2006 Decided and Filed: July 22, 2008 Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge; BELL, Chief District Judge.* _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Joseph R. Wilson, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Spiros P. Cocoves, LAW OFFICE, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellee ON BRIEF: Joseph R. Wilson, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Spiros P. Cocoves,…

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 14, 1973, convicting him of assault in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to probation for five years.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The matters raised were the same as those previously decided and there had been no material change in the circumstances to warrant revisiting them. The Court noted,"… what is before the Court is a preliminary discovery application, not Ben-Hur. The interests of justice are not served in comparatively modest procedural litigation… by permitting no stone to go…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The appellant was found guilty in provincial court for refusing to comply with the officer’s demand S. 234.1 (2)…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R Vs Robert

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Roberts was “convicted by Keenen J., sitting without a jury, of aggravated assault and possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose.” (R v. Roberts, p 5) The sentence was postponed, however, from 2001 to 2004, because of a pending application submitted by the Crown. The application was to submit Roberts to psychiatric testing to determine if he would be convicted as a dangerous offender under section 753 of the Criminal Code or a long-term offender under section 753.1 of the Criminal Code. The application was approved and the assessment of Roberts proceeded. The sentencing judge, LaForme J., found that Roberts never fit the criteria to be a dangerous or long-term offender as described in the Criminal Code and he found that Roberts would not be sentenced as such. Roberts was sentenced to “two years less a day plus three years probation on terms requiring submission to psychiatric treatment, medication treatment, drug and alcohol treatment, plus testing and other rehabilitative conditions.” (R v. Roberts, p…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ANDREA V. DENOLF Case Study

    • 4838 Words
    • 20 Pages

    1) Whether the Gun Free School Zone Act of 1997 (18 USC 922 q) applies to DeNolf and whether it violates the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution…

    • 4838 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the Wife’s Complaint for Divorce, and the Husband’s Counter Complaint for Divorce, and the Court having scheduled a Final Hearing for June 17, 2012, and the parties and their respective counsel having appeared before the Court on said date, and the parties having established residency during the Final Hearing, and the Court being otherwise fully advised the premises finds that:…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court’s judgment in R. v. Morin (1992) 1 SCR 771, set out “administrative guidelines” regarding claims made involving section 11(b) of the Charter, and how to assess the reasonableness of institutional delay. Some of the factors that the Supreme Court considers in regards to whether a delay is reasonable or not includes reasons for the delay, length of the delay, prejudicial effect on the Appellant and any waiver of time periods. In R v. Morin, on behalf of the majority, Sopinka J. explained that depending on the presence or absence of prejudice, the administrative guidelines for institutional delay could be adjusted. Between committal and trial, an eight to ten months administrative guideline was establish by the Court for Provincial Court cases, and following a preliminary hearing a delay of an additional six to eight months is considered reasonable. In R. v. Jordan case, the judge found 32.5 months institutional delay and a two months total Crown delay. Of the 32.5 months institutional delay, overwhelmingly lack of resources caused 19 months of delay in Provincial Court. After examining the total amount of institutional/Crown delay, the judge concluded that this delay “substantially exceeded” the guidelines set out by Morin, but, on its own, it is not an unreasonable delay. The Appellant submitted an application for a stay of proceedings that was dismissed by the trial judge, because the judge concluded, the prejudice experienced by Jordan resulting from the delay was not substantial. According to the judge, the delays were institutional and the Appellant charges were more serious. Any meaningful prejudice experienced by Jordan was not significant. Also, because of a prior conviction, he was subject to a conditional sentence order; his bail condition did not have any significant impact on him and while on bail he was also able to find employment. Thus, the Appellant…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mempa V. Rhay

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of Mempa v. Rhay, which the accused pleaded guilty with the advice of court-appointed counsel to the crime of "joyriding" and was placed on probation for two years. Then soon after the sentence was deferred because he was involved in a burglary and sentenced to 10 years in prison but only would receive 1 year with the advice from the parole. This was achieved due the fact that the probation officer questioned by the probationer about the incident and the parolee admitted his involvement. The offender filed a petition of habeas corpus in the State Supreme Court claiming that he had been denied the right to counsel during the probation revocation hearing, the court denied the petition. In later years the offender reoffended and convicted of second degree burglary and then placed on probation, while on probation he was arrested for forgery and grand larceny. Again at the revocation hearing the defendant had council but never showed but the proceedings still took place.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against Padilla

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The government filled a motion to dismiss this application on the arguments that Padilla’s lawyer could not file and sign the petitioner on his behalf because the lawyer was not proper next friend required in such applications. The government also argued that the respondent was the commander of the navy brig where Padilla was being held and not the Secretary of defense as indicated in the application. In addition, the government contended that the court lacked jurisdiction over the respondent who resided in another…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psi Report

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On the 2nd March of 2009, the Court committed the above-named offender to the custody of the probation officer because he committed shoplifting.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outrage of a Talk Show Host

    • 2984 Words
    • 12 Pages

    DISPOSITION: ORDERED that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.…

    • 2984 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observation

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bibliography: Gumpresht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Obersvation

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    References: Gumpresht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics