A development that could have been preventable through possible disarmament negotiations after the war, had the US not underestimated the USSR. Considering the aftermath of World War II, the USSR had lost an estimate of 22 million lives and had large decimated areas of land. The US couldn’t possibly see the USSR as a military threat due to the heavy casualties the nation had sustained. In all likeliness, the US may have thought that “nuclear diplomacy” would be enough to quell the USSR if the need arose. A decade later the USSR had displayed its very own jet-bomber called the Mya-4 “Bison”. In 1955, an American air force attache, had observed twice the number of Bisons that were estimated to have been made. This jet-bomber was far more capable of inflicting injury upon the US than the Tu-4, and to further the anxiety of the US, the USSR had detonated its first thermonuclear weapon in…
March 23, 1983 under President Ronald Reagan, the Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as Star Wars, was implemented. The SDI was a missile defense system with the intentions to protect the United States from attack by nuclear weapons. This initiative was specifically targeted towards the Soviet Union. The Soviets feared that the new initiative, would further enable the United States to launch their first-strike against them. Although this Initiative seemed to be a well thought out plan, the technology proved to be too complex and much of the research was later cancelled, and the plan…
At the midst of the Cold War the United States consistently lead the fight with their advanced missile systems, ever evolving Military concepts and operations. This was never more prevalent with the quick evolution with the development of the Nike-Ajax in 1945 and production ceasing in 1958 for the transition to the newer, more powerful all-solid-fuel Nike-Hercules missile. (https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/missile-surface-air-nike-ajax) With the continued threat from The Soviet Union, The United States was unrelenting and persistent with being able to defend and prevent all threats. The United States implemented a policy known as “Mutually Assured Destruction”, with the acronym MAD becoming a widespread metaphor expressing the worst fears of the era. (http://nikemissile.org/ColdWar/whatwehave/) The Ajax’s need for upgrades quickly became the forefront of the National Air Defense.…
In the turn of the 20th century, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States was the most powerful nation; it prospered economically, militarily, and politically. With this increase in power came a great consideration over how the United States would deal with foreign affairs. After the attacks on the World Trade Center the idea of preemptive measures became the highlight of the Bush's National Security…
If the United States or NATO were to increase that number, the USSR could respond with increasing their arsenal by the same amount. The strategic nuclear forces of the Soviet Union and the United States were changing in character in 1968. The total number of missiles held by the United States had been static since 1967 at 1,054 ICBMs and 656 SLBMs but there was an increasing number of missiles with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) warheads being deployed. MIRVs carried multiple nuclear warheads, often with dummies, to confuse ABM systems, making MIRV defense by ABM systems increasingly difficult and expensive. One clause of the treaty required both countries to limit the number of sites protected by an anti-ballistic missile (ABM) system to two each. The Soviet Union had…
Leonid Kistersky, (1996), New Dimensions of the International Security System after the Cold War, Centre for International Security and Arms Control, Stanford University.…
In 1985, the United States and the Soviet Union relations were coming to a new balance of power when the Soviet Union collapsed into independent nation’s beginning early in 1985. After years of Soviet military build-up at the expense of domestic development; economic growth was at a standstill. The United States was flourishing from an economic boast in a growth and strengthening of military power to bring the United States into a new leap in technological advancement over the Soviet’s. In Ronald Reagan’s second inaugural speech, he states in paragraph 30 that “One nation, the Soviet Union, has conducted the greatest military buildup in the history of man, building arsenals of awesome offensive weapons.” In this statement, Ronald Reagan knew that he had to direct the United States’ Military in a direction that would equal or surpass the strength of the Soviet military and any future threat to this nation that would come. The balance of power here between both super powers of the time was to build the military might as much as possible all in only to avoid the use of the last resort of a weapon that would be to come to a nuclear war.…
In its simplest form, deterrence consists of the following threat, intended to dissuade a state from aggression: ‘Do not attack me because if you do, something unacceptably horrible will happen to you.’ In other words, deterrence is a form of persuasion in military strategy. To convey such a threat, the deterrer must decide what constitutes an attack, and must then decide what level of response would be adequate to deter it. This in turn depends on the deterrer’s estimation of the adversary’s intentions and the values it places on them. For deterrence to succeed, the threat must also be credible. Not only must the potential aggressor believe that the costs of an attack would be higher than its benefits, but also that there is a significant likelihood that such costs would indeed be incurred.…
Throughout thousands of years mankind has developed and used different weapons to take out their enemies. Not until the last 100 years though, have these weapons been threats that can kill millions of people in seconds and decimate entire cities. With the development of weapons such as the atomic and hydrogen bombs and chemical and biological warfare, modern warfare has become a destructive force effecting not just one city but whole countries and hundreds of millions of people. With such terrible and destructive power is it possible that in the future weapons many times more dangerous will arise? And the bigger question, who will be in control of such great power and how can we prevent this technology from getting into the hands of others such as terrorist groups? The past has shown what man can do to one another, and the deadly aftermath of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) such as nuclear bombs can pollute an area with radioactive wastes that can last for centuries, such as the bombings of Japan during World War I. All in all weapons of mass destruction have been forceful weapons for those that possess them and a danger for everyone on earth.…
The reliance on SOPs during the Cuban Missile Crisis is an example of poor foreign policy decision making during a time of crisis. With the use of different deception tactics, Soviet missiles were sent to Cuba in secrecy. Upon the arrival in Cuba, the Soviets failed to properly camouflage the missiles, their soldiers, and the barracks stationed in Cuba. The Soviets lack of secrecy and security is due to the bureaucracy adhering to and the misapplication of SOPs. The standard operating procedures for construction of nuclear missile sites failed to include camouflage which would disguise their activities on foreign territory. The Soviets adhered to procedures at their Cuban barracks exactly as they would in the Soviet Union. These are some of the factors that contributed to the United States government's realization that Soviet missiles had been delivered to Cuba by the Soviets.…
The origins of the international arms regulation and thus, the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) can be traced back to the start of the Cold War. NATO had an interest in slowing the transfer of advanced military technologies to the Soviet Union. They created the Coordinating Committee for Multilateral Export Controls (COCOM) to block arms, industrial technologies, and “atomic” technologies from being exported to the Soviet Union from countries in the Warsaw Pact. This was not a nonproliferation regime and its limited scope proved ill-equipped to handle the emerging problems of the Post-Cold War era. This was evident during the 1991 Persian Gulf War where the Iraqi military was able to build the world’s fourth-largest military with $40 billion in foreign weapons purchases.(Lewis, 2005)…
Although there have been movements since 1991 to eliminate nuclear weapons from the face of the navy and ground units of nuclear states all around the world, in response to fears both realistic leaders "missing" nuclear weapons in the Soviet Union, the two countries continue to deploy large number of tactical weapons at air bases. As almost all of these weapons are vulnerable to a nuclear attack, they can’t be used for deterrence, and therefore are weapons for the first time use or for use against non-nuclear adversaries. However, because the United States and Russia, still stock incredible amount of nuclear weaponry,…
The Non Proliferation regime treaty came into force in 1970 after nearly 10 years of negotiations. Its main scope is to prevent the spread of highly dangerous weapons, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and finally to achieve general and complete disarmament. (2003, Bunn).…
United States and Russian arms control and arms reduction treaties such as the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty are considered to be positive steps, but it is also acknowledged that the road to the ultimate goal remains tenuous and full of difficult twists and turns.…
Woolf. Amy. F, (2011) Nuclear Arms Control: The Strategic: Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty, Congressive Research Service.…