Preview

Romeo phillion research

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Romeo phillion research
Appeal refers to the appellant, sometimes called the plaintiff in error, must file a notice of appeal, along with the necessary documents, to commence appellate review. The person against whom the appeal is brought, the appellee, then files a brief in response to the appellant's allegations.(http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Appeal+(law) which means requesting a formal change to an official decision. In this case only one appeal had taken place.in 2009 Romeo Phillion sat through his first and last appeal. However, should this appeal even had taken place? The case was reopened in 2006, and in March 2009, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned his 1972 murder conviction and granted him a new trial, in part because a 1968 police report establishing a clear alibi for Phillion had not been turned over to his defence lawyer. (trial.http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/phillion/) due to the fact that Phillion was wrongfully accused he should not have even had an appeal.

Witness testimony

Phillion was charged with the murder and during his 1972 trial four witnesses testified they saw Phillion in Ottawa on the day of the murder. Phillion was convicted and sentenced to life in prison with a minimum of ten years before parole (http://forejustice.org/db/Phillion--Romeo.html) in this particular case it was intriguing to come to realize that four witnesses had testified that they saw Phillion when intact he had not even been in the same area. Considering that this case was reopened 31 years after, unfortunately the people who testified was never put into question or put on trial. I believe those people should have been punished because not only did they put an innocent man away for over three decades but they swore on the bible that they would tell the truth and they should be punished for lying.

Probation/parole

The Ontario Court of Appeal overturned Mr. Phillion's murder conviction for the 1967 stabbing death of Ottawa firefighter Leopold

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    At the time of the filing of his appeal, Mr. David R. Bullock had been charged and convicted of…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Miranda appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court of Arizona. The Supreme Court of Arizona found that Mr. Miranda was fully aware of his constitutional rights, and his conviction was affirmed. Mr. Miranda appealed the Supreme Court of Arizona’s decision to the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the morning of Sunday 21st April 1996, a young Hobart man, Martin Bryant armed himself with three high powered automatic firearms and a large quantity of ammunition and then drove to Port Arthur. North of Port Arthur, he entered the home of a couple he briefly met as a child. Inside he started his rampage, shooting them both. Once he arrived at the Historical Site Port Arthur he ate a meal at the Broad Arrow Café. He then waited till his meal was finished to take his rifle from his bag and began to indiscriminately shoot around the crowded Cafe. Within the first 90 seconds, 20 people had died and 12 were injured. The man then moved to the adjacent car park, where he shot and killed four more people and added to the toll of injured people as well. After shooting at people in the grounds of the Historic Site, he maneuvered into his car and drove up the former main entrance road to the original toll booth. In this area, seven more people were killed in two separate incidents, during which he stole a victim’s car and abandoned his own. Driving north to a General Store, he killed another person and took one hostage then drove back to the place of his first killings, firing random shots at vehicles along the way. At the house, he continued to set fire to the stolen car and then took his hostage inside. Through the afternoon and night, shots were fired at police officers on the scene. At some point during this time, Bryant killed the hostage. When morning arrived, he set fire to the house and was captured by police as he fled. By the time the incidents had finished he had killed 35 people and injured 18. . Bryant had 72 criminal charges pressed against him and 551 witness statements were entered. After initially pleading “not guilty” to 72 charges, his plea was changed after conversations with his lawyer. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with no eligibility for parole on all 35 murder charges, plus 21 years for each of the remaining counts of the indictment.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sibler v Stacey s

    • 4506 Words
    • 13 Pages

    [Quicklaw note: Supplementary reasons for judgment were delivered December 19, 1985. See [1985] B.C.J. No. 3009.]…

    • 4506 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 14, 1973, convicting him of assault in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to probation for five years.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The appellant was found guilty in provincial court for refusing to comply with the officer’s demand S. 234.1 (2)…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The petitioner, Timothy Hurst, was convicted of first degree murder and the jury recommended the death penalty to the judge in Florida, who then sentenced Hurst to death. Hurst appealed to the Florida Supreme Court and was granted resentencing. The Florida Supreme Court rejected Hurst’s argument and reaffirmed his sentence. The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case had a total of three trials which lasted for about ten years. For the first trial Guy Paul was defended by a famous Toronto lawyer named Clayton Ruby (Guy). He was well known for facing tough criminal cases and his main defense in this trial was that the police did not build up a proper case before arresting his client, Guy Paul was then found not guilty but that trial was appealed and a second trial took place six years later. In the second case he was found guilty where he was against Neil McGuigan and was defended by Jack Kofshy (Guy). Unlike the first trial, Guy Paul was found guilty and was send to a lifetime in prison. Then 18 months into his prison sentence he was bailed out for $40,000 and had a third and final trial (Faryon). In this trial came new DNA evidence which proved that the seamen found on the underwear of Christine Jessop did not match Guy Paul’s DNA. With that in mind he was released of all charges and was let go. It took him 10 years and 3 visits to the court to be proven to not be guilty. It was known by him and his family that he was not guilty and that by the end of it all, the actual killer may not be found. This is a story which showcases a life of a man and his struggles against the Canadian justice system. Then finally after ten years he can live life knowing that he will no longer be judged of being a murderer. That is why his life can inspire people to…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over the seven years, the defense attorney would claim evidence to be inaccurate, and appeal to the Supreme Judicial Court. During that time, Sacco and Vanzetti were housed in prisons awaiting a final sentencing. Around this time, a man named Celestino Medeiros confessed to both the robbery and the murder, saying that Sacco and Vanzetti had no part in the crime (Watson). The judge in charge of the case, Judge Thayer, denied the confession, stating that the defense committee had a “belief in the existence of something which in fact and truth has no such existence” (Watson), giving no further examination of the evidence (Watson). With the execution nearing, Sacco and Vanzetti were brought to Charlestown State Prison. In the Boston area, over twenty thousand people protested the executions (Watson). At the moment of the execution, Vanzetti asserted that “he forgave those who are doing this to him”, this including, the judge, and the prosecutors (“Sacco and Vazetti put to death”). After their deaths, the international reply had turned…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leonard Peltier

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reading more I began to see why people felt Peltier was wrongly convicted. The evidence did not back up the accusations that Peltier was…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I strongly feel that Loeb and Leopold ought to be punished for the murder of 14-year-old Robert Franks. I believe that they hold full responsibility for their actions and crimes. I believe in compatibilism. However, I do not believe in the existence of the supernatural. Through agreeing with the first theory and disagreeing with the latter theory, Loeb and Leopold will be held responsible for their actions and would be morally punished.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many young men have killed over 100 innocent people, they killed mothers, fathers, and children. They didn’t think before killing these people, they just did it. Then, people find out what they have done, and many of these men found a way to get away without punishment. The men live their lives, get other jobs, get married, and even have children. As they live on, the people that they have killed never get to experience the rest of their lives, they are only a memory. Finally, almost 80 years later people find out what they have done in the past. These men are well into their nineties and are being put on trial for their crimes. Some do not believe that this is not right since so many years have passed since they have done these crimes. Even…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Gentleman of the jury, be merciful. For God’s sake, be merciful. He is innocent of all charges brought against him. But let us say he was not. Let us say for a moment he was not. What justice would there be to take this life? Justice gentleman? Why I would just as soon put a hog in the electric chair as this”. (Chap. 1, pg. 8) My analysis of this story weighs on multiple dynamics:…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gilles Leclair did not get sentenced. The police just charged with second degree murder. The Crown abandoned the case after two independent pathologists who reviewed the death said they couldn't be sure her death wasn't an accidental drowning. They pointed to the fact that there were no marks on her neck to indicate strangulation. Mr. Leclair did spent a month in provincial jail at Innes Road, where, he recalled, he was treated worse than the neighbour's dog.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda Decision

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda was convicted of the armed robbery, but his attorneys appealed the case on the grounds that Miranda did not understand that he had the right against self-incrimination.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics