Romeo and Juliet - Zeffirelli vs Luhrmann
Romeo and Juliet, one of the best love stories of all time, was written by the world famous author Shakespeare, in the early 1600s. The story was a major hit. Everyone loved it. Two men, named Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann, loved the tragedy so much that they decided to share the story with the rest of the world. In 1968 Zeffirelli directed his version of Romeo and Juliet. Then, in 1997 Luhrmann version was produced. Both movies told the tragic tale of two star-crossed lovers that were held apart by fate. The two movies had a lot in common, but at the same time they both had many differences. The Zeffirelli version took place in the city of Verona. While the Luhrmann version took place on Verona Beach. Both were good settings for the play because they both pointed out the ways of life in the time period that the director wanted to display the film. The 1967 movie showed what the times were like in the period that Shakespeare lived. In the 1997 film Luhrmann showed the way people live in the present days. The dialogue in both of the versions was based on the dialogue that Shakespeare used when he wrote the play. The producers decided which lines were the least important and left those lines out of their movie. That was one of the main differences in the play. During the scene when Romeo was going to talk to the Friar about getting married, the 1967 film left out the speech about the power of plants that was spoken by the Friar. That was one of the most important speeches in the whole script and film. Without it you didn't get the whole affect of the power of potions and poisons. Another major difference in the script is in the 1997 version. The nurse approaches Romeo to talk about the wedding arrangements and she isn't harassed for looking like a huge ship with a sail but as an old lady. Neither of the film versions had Paris at the Capulet tomb when Romeo arrives there to look at Juliets body. They completely left him out of the ending which left out a lot