Preview

Roman Propaganda Expressed Through Art

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
879 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman Propaganda Expressed Through Art
Unit 7 Essay
Mark Sprowls
AP art history The Roman rulers from ancient times are well-known for their ability to coax their people into thinking a certain way through the use of convincing pieces of art. The Roman Empire was very troubled and its emperors are infamous for such things as lavish spending, unnecessary war, and even the killing of family members, and this begs the question: how were there so few large scale revolts of the Roman populous? The answer is the use of propaganda in popular Roman culture. The Roman Empire used propaganda for political purposes by incorporating Roman family values, victorious war scenes, and general Roman successes into their artworks. Adding family values to art that depicted a Roman ruler’s kin instilled trust into the emperor’s regime and was a very common practice. The Romans were notorious for their murder of their own family members in order to gain power, which aroused question of the empire in its citizens. Of course the last thing a ruler would want to happen is to be overthrown by his people so Roman rulers quickly devised a way to reestablish the citizen’s faith in the emperor, which just happened to be the integration of propaganda into art pieces. One prime example of this is the Tellus panel on the Ara Pacis. On this panel we can see Tellus, the Earth, who represents the fertility of the royal family and perhaps hints at the godly power that the royal family held. Another example of the addition of family values to a piece of art is Painted portrait of Septimus Severus. This work depicts the royal family with one member of the family, Geta, with his face rendered unrecognizable. The story behind Geta is that he was murdered by his brother, Caracalla, so that Caracalla would have ultimate ruling power. Oddly enough etching out Geta’s face was a form of propaganda that incorporated family values because it made its audience “forget” about Geta so that the general population would not remember the tragedy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In examining the histories presented by Livy and Tacitus, it is crucial to take into account the agendas of the respective authors. While both set out to portray as accurate of a historical representation as possible, it is evident that both renowned historians and rhetoricians intended to deliver several significant messages regarding their thoughts on Rome. Both authors do, indeed, acknowledge the greatness of Rome and champion the core of Roman values; however, Livy and Tacitus tactfully elaborate on different troubles that face the Roman Empire. The histories put forth by these great men aim to present the past as an aid to promote the betterment Rome as a Republic and to prevent the fall of the Roman Empire.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall of Rome DBQ

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The great Roman Empire expanded across all of Europe and into the Middle East. Its military was one of the finest. With major trading in Africa and Britain, the economy flourished with brining many citizens a healthy income. With amazing advancements in culture and technology, Roman society was at its finest. During the Pax Romana, the Romans had 200 years of peace and good ruling by level headed dictators and emperors. Despite Rome’s greatness in all of these areas, Rome would eventually fall. Surprisingly all of these qualities that led up to a flourishing empire were the same ones that led to its demise. As Germanic tribes invaded, the military weakened and the government became unstable. Along with increased political trouble, there was a decline in economic and social structure. The fall of Rome was due to its leaders ignoring the severity of Rome’s problems.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the fifth and fourth centuries Rome’s tyrannical rule was defeated, and an aristocracy of patricians became the ruling class. The common people, the plebeians, had been weakened in society after the King’s defeat, but to meet the demands of the people, Tribunes were put into power as the heads of the plebeians. Up until this point, the “task of maintaining a body of law was met through oral traditions”, but the tribunes “demanded that laws should be reduced to writing and made public”. This made the development of a common alphabet for the Roman people a priority, and the Latin language was soon established. The resulting Twelve Tables became one of the earliest known Roman establishments of the written word. Literature, such as Virgil’s Aeneid, soon started the tradition of using the written word as a form of propaganda that could be geared toward the literate and therefore more influential in society. Other “literary propaganda in the form of letters, treatises, published books and speeches” from more strictly political circles were also made and used in abundance.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Rome Fell

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the saying goes, “Rome was not built in a day.” The decline of Rome can attribute a similar statement, that is, Rome was not destroyed in a day. The fall of Rome can be traced back to the time when Rome was a republic and Julius Caesar marched his legions into the city itself and took control as a dictator. This act alone caused rifts within the Roman ruling class that would echo for generations. The rise of the Emperor replaced the republic and the Emperor himself began to become worshipped as a deity among the traditional pagan beliefs of Roman citizenry. The vast expanse of land that the Roman Empire amassed became difficult to manage by the centralized rule of the Emperor. This led to the governing of the outlying provinces to individual governors, who at times were more interested in their own prosperity than of the prosperity of the Empire. The governors’ own political initiatives led to the Emperor losing his power in the outlying provinces. An example of this is the Roman governors Vindex and Galba, who during the reign of Emperor Nero revolted against the central government. Vindex supported Galba in his bid to overthrow Nero in order to pursue Vindex’s own political prowess under Galba’s new regime. (Donahue, 1999) Revolts such as this one illustrate how people who are distanced from the central government find it difficult to be ruled by them. It is interesting to see that both Vindex and Galba were from the far reaches of the Roman…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For one, as reported by Priscus, a Roman ambassador(449 CE), who was interviewing a former citizen of Rome: “the condition of Roman subjects during a time of peace [was] worse than war.”(Doc. E) The Roman people were in bad shape because of an unfair law, “taxes [were] very severe, and unprincipled men inflict[ed] injuries on others.”(Doc. E) The dire situation convinced the Roman citizens more and more that they should protest. And when the people did fight back, internal problems surfaced in Rome. However, not only were there harsh taxes causing turmoil, the Roman government was corrupt as well. “The climax of misery is to have to pay in order to obtain justice.”(Doc. E) The rich were bribing the lawmakers so they could get out of facing the law, and the poor didn’t have enough money to get out of punishment as well! Therefore, a great hatred between the rich and the poor was established. Rome may have been able to withstand battles on the outside, but if faced harsh battles within. The patricians believed that they could get away with whatever they wanted to, all they had to do was pay. Murder, theft, abuse and bribery were now tolerated in a place that would not have allowed them to be before. To sum up, Rome’s destruction was induced by legal injustice inside the…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Crisis of the Third Century was the era in which the Roman Empire almost collapsed under the many myriad of pressures including economic depression, civil war, plague and invasion. Because war was expensive, the Roman Empire had to increase taxes and this caused for many of the Romans to be upset and for the economy to be in a crisis. Revolts were also started because many of the civilians retaliated back because of such high taxes. The Crisis began with the assassination of Alexander Severus and because his own troops killed him, for the next fifty years many claimants named as emperors tried to rule Rome entirely and rule the Imperial Rome. Although the Romans did create the largest and most successful political government, lack of working together and not knowing any kind of political information of the emperor selected at the time, also caused for their crisis to begin in a bad start. “An additional definition is the act of deliberately killing someone especially a public figure, usually for hire or for political reasons. Assassinations may be prompted by religious, ideological” (Ott, J). The Roman Empire was built by cities, the people, and their military, which at the beginning sounded smart, and later because of lack of teamwork the empire was at a near fall. Inflation and with a collapsed currency, only seemed to make things worse for the Roman Empire. These are only some of the reasons that contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire and caused great changes to the roman people. “As Roman territory grew, conquest continued to fuel further conquest, but this was not a pattern that could continue indefinitely” (Ott, J) P1. For the most part this common pattern was only the main beginning to tragedy for this empire.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    SHELDON
NODELMAN
 from
 E.
D’Ambra,
ed.,
Roman
Art
in
Context.
NY:
Prentice
Hall.
1993
pp.
10‐20
 Like all works of art. the portrait is a system of signs; it is often an ideogram of “public’ meanings condensed into the image of a human face. Roman portrait sculpture from the Republic through the late Empire-the second century BCE. to the sixth CE -constitutes what is surely the most remarkable body of portrait art ever created. Its shifting montage of abstractions from human appearance and character forms a language in which the history of a whole society can be read. Beginning in the first century B.C., Roman artists invented a new kind of portraiture, as unlike that of the great tradition of Greek Hellenistic art (whence the Romans had ultimately derived the idea of portraiture itself and a highly developed vocabulary of formal devices for its realization) as it was unlike that of their own previous Italo-Hellenistic local tradition. This new conception, conferring upon the portrait an unprecedented capacity to articulate and project the interior processes of human experience, made possible the achievement in the ensuing six centuries of what is surely the most extraordinary body of portrait art ever created, and forms the indispensable basis for the whole of the later European portrait tradition, from its rebirth in the 13th and 14th centuries to its virtual extinction in the 20th. No clear account of the nature of this reformulation of the structure of representation or of its historical significance has so far been given. That the portraiture which it engendered is strikingly “realistic” in the sense of evoking the presence of an astonishingly concrete and specific individuality, to a degree previously unknown and rarely equaled since, has been the universal experience of every observer. But this question-begging term (first used to characterize Roman portraiture, in opposition to the “idealism” imputed to the Greeks, three…

    • 3461 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman portraiture was one of the most significant periods in the development of portrait art. The characteristics of Roman portraitures are more modest, realistic, idealized, and natural. Also, the body compositions, muscles and facial expressions of portraits and sculptures are more advanced. Many roman portraits are directly linked to specific individuals, such as gods and emperors. They were often used for propaganda purposes and included ideological messages in the pose, accoutrements, or costume of the figure.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political corruption in Rome had gotten out of control, especially with the Praetorian Guards, the elite soldiers who directly defended the emperor. Sometimes these guards didn’t feel like they would find someone who was offering to pay them more than the emperor, or in some cases, like the story of Sejanus, commander of the Praetorian Guard for Tiberius, had put out an auction for the throne to the highest bidder. This caused a frequent change in untrained emperors, not yet ready to handle the power they had bought. The political system had fallen apart and the emperors had less and less control and spinning Rome into economic declines, plagues, poverty, and an overpopulated empire. This made Rome a giant target, holding the entire known world’s power weak and easily obtainable.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Rome was one of the greatest empires of the ancient world.” (McGill) The early Roman state was founded in 509 B.C. after the Romans drove out the hated Etruscan king. By this time Rome had already grown from a cluster of small villages to a small city. The Roman Republic lasted for about six centuries, but gradually declined due to corruption and social problems. Strongmen competed for power, and out of these civil wars came the one-man dictatorship known as the Empire. The five centuries of the Empire saw Rome become one of the world's great civilizations, as the city extended its rule throughout the Mediterranean and into Northern Europe. Eventually, however, the imperial system also declined into corruption. Little did the early Roman settlers know that this was going to happen to their little village. (McGill)…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is hard to think of the ancient world without looking at the Greek and Roman empires. Although similar, the Greek and Roman empires are two different cultures. They existed from 500 B.C.E. to 500 C.E. (Fiero, 2006). One constant in both cultures was their pursuit of perfection in their art and architecture. This paper will examine this pursuit of perfection in both cultures and how their impact is felt in the modern age.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Propaganda is when someone uses allegations, ideas, or rumors to further their own cause and hurt someone else. I do believe that the Romans used this method to make themselves and their empire look better. The Romans might have been some of the first rulers to use propaganda, but since their time we have seen many political leaders use the same methods to make themselves achieve a higher level of affection from the people under them.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Propaganda was a huge part in Imperial Rome and China.In Imperial Rome Propaganda was used to promote or publicize a particular event or point of view. In Rome they used propaganda a lot in a variety of ways, the most common type of propaganda they used was military propaganda. For example, Rome successfully won two wars against the Dacians. Trajan made the Forum of Trajan and the Column of Trajan for the people. The Forum's use was for people to gather during business or legal events. The Column in particular is a huge piece of propaganda, it has pictures of the military winning two wars against the Dacians. Trajan wanted to commemorate his victories and success. Propaganda was also a huge part in Imperial China.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Rome is recognized as being the forefront of technological innovations and efficiency improvement. The Pont du Gard aqueduct is no less than an impressive engineering feat, stretching for miles to deliver water to town centers. Roman architectural features, such as arches and domes, still remain a prominent presence in modern architecture, proving just how timeless, and more importantly, functional these inventions are. However, one notable difference between the two societies is that unlike Ancient Rome's approach to technological adoption through the appropriation of foreign territories, the United States gained its technological edge through development and research. From the invention of electricity and automobiles to computers,…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Republic was the major stronghold for centuries. Encompassing the Mediterranean and much of Europe, and even having influence throughout Egypt and beyond, it was well understood that Rome was not to be messed with. No civilization could ever topple such a well-organized and technologically advanced society such as Rome. No civilization, that is, other than its own self. Pride, revenge, and greed influenced key decisions that pried at the few loose ends that Rome had. Generals, soldiers, and the Senate alike destroyed the foundations on which the Roman Republic was built on, and the nation collapsed from the inside out. In a perfect world, Rome had an…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays